This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
steeleye20 Croydon 22 Jan 24 9.40pm | |
---|---|
If we were to be relegated, we would not suffer the dreaded VAR and it would be more enjoyable. But knowing our luck, they would probably introduce it anyway.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 22 Jan 24 9.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
As PL matches can be decided off-pitch, and actually the PL itself, you may as well not bother, as the actual football played is superfluous.
That would save a lot of time. Bring back the pools panel to decide the scores then pay your money to sit in the ground and have the result read out.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Elpis In a pub 11 Feb 24 11.54am | |
---|---|
More VAR nonsense yesterday at the Luton Sheffield game, two penalties for handball that were never pens in a hundred years but are this week ,joke decisions that would have been condemned had it not been one to each side .
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
izardi Carshalton 11 Feb 24 12.45pm | |
---|---|
One thing that bothered me at the Sheff U match.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Elpis In a pub 11 Feb 24 2.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by izardi
One thing that bothered me at the Sheff U match. It was a flaw in the system that was picked up on its conception in no flag situations . You can't ref (with the help of the lino) half the game and get it all right . VAR has got more wrong than the ref /lino combination ever did .
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dreamwaverider London 26 Feb 24 4.23pm | |
---|---|
So for the first time, v Burnley the game had four usually slow VAR calls for all 3 goals and their disallowed goal.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Elpis In a pub 27 Feb 24 7.11am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dreamwaverider
So for the first time, v Burnley the game had four usually slow VAR calls for all 3 goals and their disallowed goal. Well said , echo's what many fans around the world think of it
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Elpis In a pub 31 Mar 24 10.07am | |
---|---|
A thing that has crept into the game that really gives me the hump is penalties being awarded when the striker initiates the contact .Both of Newcastles v the spammers were such yesterday . Gordon was the player that 'won' the pens with what some would call clever play (I call it cheating) the first was given by the ref and not overturned which is just about acceptable . The second not given by the ref was by VAR . For me it was actually a foul by Gordon on Phillips Just don't know what the VAR was looking at there . And where was it at Chelsea , the Burnley defender was defending as required and gets sent off ! Meanwhile the all in wrestling at corners continues .
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
stancummins 31 Mar 24 10.41am | |
---|---|
Actually thought certainly the second penalty should have been a free kick to West Ham , as Gordon impeded Philips , thought it was poor officiating from the VAR official and the ref bottled it with 50K geordies screaming at him
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 23 Apr 24 9.05am | |
---|---|
So Forest threatening to take action after the Everton game. I must admit that none of the penalties looked stonewalled to me but then again I'm not sure what is a penalty these days. However the Forest response was quite belligerent and this is not the first time this season, it seems to co-inside with them recruiting Clattenburg as a Ref Watch advisor. Clattenburg seems upset over the standard of referring perhaps he should consider his own performance in the FA cup final, Mr Pot calling Mr Kettle. The best thing Forest can do is to get rid of him and apologise.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 23 Apr 24 9.16am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
So Forest threatening to take action after the Everton game. I must admit that none of the penalties looked stonewalled to me but then again I'm not sure what is a penalty these days. However the Forest response was quite belligerent and this is not the first time this season, it seems to co-inside with them recruiting Clattenburg as a Ref Watch advisor. Clattenburg seems upset over the standard of referring perhaps he should consider his own performance in the FA cup final, Mr Pot calling Mr Kettle. The best thing Forest can do is to get rid of him and apologise.
A reference to a single game in the illustrious career of Mark Clattenburg who of course refereed in the Champions League final and the Euro 2016 final.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 23 Apr 24 10.06am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
So Forest threatening to take action after the Everton game. I must admit that none of the penalties looked stonewalled to me but then again I'm not sure what is a penalty these days. However the Forest response was quite belligerent and this is not the first time this season, it seems to co-inside with them recruiting Clattenburg as a Ref Watch advisor. Clattenburg seems upset over the standard of referring perhaps he should consider his own performance in the FA cup final, Mr Pot calling Mr Kettle. The best thing Forest can do is to get rid of him and apologise.
They'll never win any argument based on subjectivity. Accepting referees can make mistakes, or be unsighted, is one thing but VAR should have at least recommended the ref reviewed the incidents.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.