No one is my 'crony' on Hol, I can't help it that your 'hollyweird' type politics feels under siege on Hol....anyway how can you go on about cronies, when you were panting over your 'granite shoreline'? Anyway, It's hardly as though your type of politics is under catered for elsewhere is it.

Well, ok if I were going to better define you I'd say you're a champagne neo liberal with 'progressive' traits with an obsessional love of pedantry.....as we see with your rather quaint annoyance with me using 'corporations'.....which is fine as a general description by the way.

I don't know that I would say that the left is more corrupt than the right, I suspect it's even, but as the left is in control of the corporations and institutions most of the corruption is coming from them.

Republican idols? Well, I like DeSantis somewhat, but the GOP is mostly a dumpster fire....to use an American phrase you no doubt deplore.

Edited by Stirlingsays (29 Dec 2022 5.31pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

I called risible the concept that you have a quiet word with a woman that has already been convicted four times for the self same offence. That is neither unfair nor provocative. It is a shame you post as if with authority when you haven't looked into the basics of the case in question.

Rebel me.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

I don't pant over anyone other than the missus. I did, of course, enjoy the way WE kept knocking you back with a straight bat. Amusement at your expense I assure you.

In UK politics, they don't come any more corrupt than the right wing of the Conservative party. If you can't see that then maybe you should stop ejaculating over Tucker Carlson and start reading the papers.

Show me where it is appropriate to use 'Corporations' for any UK company.

I had a bottle of 1990 Krug for Christmas lunch by the way.

I don't know if you look like a magistrate.
The two year figure was quoted by the Catholic News Agency. They might be lying but I think they disapprove of lying.
The question was what the sentence should be for such a serial offender.

That still doesn’t justify the arrest in any instance. But still, I have happily stated my giving you the benefit of the doubt in it being true and reevaluated my stance on the whole thing. Yet again you lead with a personal attack however so here;

I post as I feel others should, within the context of a discussion. I try to keep an open mind, put forward my thoughts on discussion topics and happily debate or explore where necessary. I’m happy to strongly assert my opinion but also to concede when appropriate, something others including yourself never, ever do. I also often post very light heartedly or with crap jokes, you know, it’s a palace fans’ forum. I usually take most things, within reason, for granted as truth no matter the source when it is posted on a fans’ forum. If this is proved incorrect I’m really not that fussed, says something about the source and not my laid back approach to such things.

If you wanted a definition of the word ‘risible’ it is your accusation of another poster’s intention to contribute ‘with authority’. You’ve done nothing, from my experience, but try to patronise, attack and denigrate others.

As I have mentioned numerous times previously, and recently, the act of actively seeking, to the extent of fabricating an enemy, as you did with me, to try and assert an imagined cognitive authority, is often the very weak sign of a failure. My thoughts were on the policing of this matter but in your hysteria to defend those seeking to abort their children you started harping on about ‘Muslims’ which had not been previously mentioned, not by me at least, alongside attacking a narrative I hadn’t provided.

This demonstrates at best that you did not read what I had written, or at worst you were desperately seeking opposition to ‘hate’ upon. I would suggest you look inwards for your anger if you are looking to resolve this situation,” and not become dramatic with others on the internet, safely hidden behind a screen.

So you carry on picking virtual verbals on the internet, if it makes you feel as though you achieved something, or a big man etc. which I would suggest is in lieu of that reflecting in reality. I tried to be fair and reasoned but I may as well converse with the cat given your responses.

Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!