This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Eaglecoops CR3 30 Sep 20 9.51am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
According to the media Brewster's advisors are telling him that Sheffield would be better for his development than either ourselves or Villa and to be honest it's hard to disagree with them. Isn't it just lovely that teams such as ours are seen as a development route for a player rather than a home? Jeez he is only a kid and plenty of them have failed to produce the goods at this level over the years. "Yeh, I'll sign", he says resignedly, "I'll hang around for a couple of years and then feck off" Best left alone I reckon. I am with taylors lovechild, I reckon we need a CF who can bully defences and attract both centre halfs to him, Mitrovic certainly fits the bill there.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 30 Sep 20 10.19am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Eaglecoops
Isn't it just lovely that teams such as ours are seen as a development route for a player rather than a home? Jeez he is only a kid and plenty of them have failed to produce the goods at this level over the years. "Yeh, I'll sign", he says resignedly, "I'll hang around for a couple of years and then feck off" I must admit that I didn't read it like that as I saw it that Brewster had a lot of potential that Sheffield United were more likely to bring out in him than we were and nothing at all about only staying for a short while. Originally posted by Eaglecoops
Does Taylor know?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
doombear Too far from Selhurst Park 30 Sep 20 10.49am | |
---|---|
I wonder if the board believe that Wilf will remain with us and is happy to play in a front two role. If he does stay and play up front with (currently) Ayew or (probably soon) Batshuayi, where would Brewster fit in? Although we have Bats on loan, it appears we have an option to buy at a fixed price, so presumably we will want to play him as one of our main strikers. What we need is a young striker who's prepared to be back-up for this year and I don't see Brewster in that role (nor for that matter Edouard, whose name has surfaced again in rumours linking him to us). Brewster's advisors are probably right if they are indeed suggesting Sheff U as the better option. Sheff U are in danger of doing a Palace of 3 years ago (3 games played no points and no goals so far and it's not as if they've played any top clubs), so need a striker. I suspect we'll be left with Wickham, so in theory we would have another striker option. Finally, I think Liverpool want to retain some hold over Brewster for the future but need to get some funds in having bought Thiago and Jota. Edited by doombear (30 Sep 2020 10.50am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
taylors lovechild 30 Sep 20 5.11pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Does Taylor know?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
est1905 30 Sep 20 5.32pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Eaglecoops
Isn't it just lovely that teams such as ours are seen as a development route for a player rather than a home? Jeez he is only a kid and plenty of them have failed to produce the goods at this level over the years. "Yeh, I'll sign", he says resignedly, "I'll hang around for a couple of years and then feck off" Best left alone I reckon. I am with taylors lovechild, I reckon we need a CF who can bully defences and attract both centre halfs to him, Mitrovic certainly fits the bill there. I think most people would agree that Sheffield United are currently either punching above their weight or at best at the pinnacle of where they can reach whereas Palace, with the players we have are underperforming. Our potential is certainly greater than that of Sheffield United.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 30 Sep 20 7.18pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by est1905
I think most people would agree that Sheffield United are currently either punching above their weight or at best at the pinnacle of where they can reach whereas Palace, with the players we have are underperforming. Our potential is certainly greater than that of Sheffield United. But where is he more likely to play?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Elphers40 Sunny South Coast 30 Sep 20 7.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by est1905
I think most people would agree that Sheffield United are currently either punching above their weight or at best at the pinnacle of where they can reach whereas Palace, with the players we have are underperforming. Our potential is certainly greater than that of Sheffield United. Disagree. They are a well supported similar sized club to us with potential to improve. I agree that the players they have exceeded expectations in the first season in the Prem - but that is very much linked to having an excellent manager who was able to get the maximum out of them all. A few good additions to that squad could see them do okay again this season Brewster would be a start. The buy back deal is not suited to us - so good luck to Sheffield , except when they play us!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Petereagle Brockley 30 Sep 20 7.54pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Elphers40
Disagree. They are a well supported similar sized club to us with potential to improve. I agree that the players they have exceeded expectations in the first season in the Prem - but that is very much linked to having an excellent manager who was able to get the maximum out of them all. A few good additions to that squad could see them do okay again this season Brewster would be a start. The buy back deal is not suited to us - so good luck to Sheffield , except when they play us! Just curious, why isn't a buy back clause suitable to us? The buying club would still make a decent profit?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Knightstar Guildford 30 Sep 20 11.03pm | |
---|---|
Exactly. Buying for £17-20M and getting two good seasons out of a player before selling him back for £40M and making a £20M profit sounds like a good deal to me. The £20M would then contribute to purchasing a decent replacement. However, I suspect our hesitation is more to do with Brewster having to compete with Bats and that might present some difficult issues re game time etc. In any event I'd like to see us pursuing him or a decent alternative as we need extra cover up front.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Ginger Pubic Wig Wickham de L'Ouest 01 Oct 20 7.33am | |
---|---|
I think a major part of our strategy needs to be buying good young players, getting them to a good standard, and then flogging them for huge profit. Look at Leicester. Mahrez, Maguire, Drinkwater, Chillwell, even Kante...brilliant work. They will surely sell Maddison soon enough for big bucks. And then no doubt find somebody even better. Palace simply are not made to be a career home for up amd coming talent. Better to understand that.
If you want to live in a world full of kindness, respect and love, try to show these qualities. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EddieMac 01 Oct 20 8.16am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Knightstar
Exactly. Buying for £17-20M and getting two good seasons out of a player before selling him back for £40M and making a £20M profit sounds like a good deal to me. The £20M would then contribute to purchasing a decent replacement. However, I suspect our hesitation is more to do with Brewster having to compete with Bats and that might present some difficult issues re game time etc. In any event I'd like to see us pursuing him or a decent alternative as we need extra cover up front. We are more than likely not even bidding for Brewster. 20 million for a player who could turn out to be the next Dominic Solanke.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Elphers40 Sunny South Coast 01 Oct 20 8.34am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Petereagle
Just curious, why isn't a buy back clause suitable to us? The buying club would still make a decent profit? As I understand it Pete - It leaves us with no control or say in the timing of the buy back, which impacts negatively on our ability to build a squad for the longer term. If Brewster tears it up for a season Liverpool can pay £40 million and take him back. We wouldn’t be able to keep him longer or sell him for more to another club.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.