You are here: Home > Message Board > General Talk > Cricket World Cup
November 22 2024 3.31pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Cricket World Cup

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 20 of 21 < 16 17 18 19 20 21 >

  

Midlands Eagle Flag 15 Jul 19 2.54pm Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle Add Midlands Eagle as a friend

I wonder how Alex Hales feels this morning

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
YT Flag Oxford 15 Jul 19 3.41pm Send a Private Message to YT Add YT as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

There is also some debate about the interpretation of the law and whether or not Stokes had completed the second run. If not England should have only been awarded 5 runs.
This sounds as though I’m trying to take away from England’s achievement which I’m not.

Very tough on NZ, whatever the interpretation.


Edited by YT (15 Jul 2019 5.05pm)

 


Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Invalid user 2019 Flag 15 Jul 19 10.22pm

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

There is also some debate about the interpretation of the law and whether or not Stokes had completed the second run. If not England should have only been awarded 5 runs.
This sounds as though I’m trying to take away from England’s achievement which I’m not.

If true it makes a change for the luck to go the way of an England team.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 15 Jul 19 10.24pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by YT

Very tough on NZ, whatever the interpretation.


Edited by YT (15 Jul 2019 5.05pm)

Yes it was. Which makes their reaction to the result so admirable.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Invalid user 2019 Flag 15 Jul 19 10.30pm

Originally posted by YT

Very tough on NZ, whatever the interpretation.


Edited by YT (15 Jul 2019 5.05pm)

Yes, gracious in defeat. It's a shame when these mistakes are made.

I'm pleased the match was free to air though at least. It certainly won't harm the popularity of the sport.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 15 Jul 19 10.36pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by dollardays

Yes, gracious in defeat. It's a shame when these mistakes are made.

I'm pleased the match was free to air though at least. It certainly won't harm the popularity of the sport.

It’s a shame the umpires couldn’t refer the decision to VAR. it’s not a situation they’re likely to have seen before.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
willardnz Flag Wanganui 15 Jul 19 11.04pm Send a Private Message to willardnz Add willardnz as a friend

It was a great game....and believe me, everyone that follows cricket down here is absolutely guttered, I know I am, grown man crying material, and yes there were factors that did not go our way, but what I can't work out, instead of a count back system, why not another super over if the scores were tied after the first, seems logical to me...(or count back the wickets taken ;-) )....but it is done and dusted now, well done to England.

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle


The ICC could possibly use another metric to decide the outcome in these situations other than most boundaries hit; cumulative runs scored or wickets taken or a combination of factors but 50 over games aren’t usually a T20 style slog fest so this feels like a slightly arbitrary stat to use.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 15 Jul 19 11.16pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by willardnz

It was a great game....and believe me, everyone that follows cricket down here is absolutely guttered, I know I am, grown man crying material, and yes there were factors that did not go our way, but what I can't work out, instead of a count back system, why not another super over if the scores were tied after the first, seems logical to me...(or count back the wickets taken ;-) )....but it is done and dusted now, well done to England.

And without trying to be patronising well done to NZ - it was some achievement to get to the final and to get that close, well, no words. Glad McCallum was watching and not playing.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 16 Jul 19 2.40am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by willardnz

It was a great game....and believe me, everyone that follows cricket down here is absolutely guttered, I know I am, grown man crying material, and yes there were factors that did not go our way, but what I can't work out, instead of a count back system, why not another super over if the scores were tied after the first, seems logical to me...(or count back the wickets taken ;-) )....but it is done and dusted now, well done to England.

I agree, it's no way to win a world cup.

I'd probably have them do super overs until a winner emerged.

Hopefully they refine it.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Midlands Eagle Flag 16 Jul 19 7.20am Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle Add Midlands Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

I'd probably have them do super overs until a winner emerged.

Hopefully they refine it.

I doubt it as what's the odds of it ever happening again

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 16 Jul 19 8.48am Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

I doubt it as what's the odds of it ever happening again

That’s the key point. With hindsight a draw and joint champions would have been better.
On another subject it was good to see pitches which offered the bowlers a chance. A tournament that long would be less interesting if every side were chasing huge scores.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Pete53 Flag Hassocks 16 Jul 19 10.21am Send a Private Message to Pete53 Add Pete53 as a friend

Blimey. The BBC 10 o'clock news last night made the following day celebrations and reflections the lead story and it lasted about 10 minutes.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 20 of 21 < 16 17 18 19 20 21 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > General Talk > Cricket World Cup