This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Football Lads Alliance
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
  Hrolf The Ganger  13 Oct 17 5.56pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Classic idiotic post. We have indirect taxes for fiscal reasons not because of the EU. Why do you have to always be so reductionist. Every little problem is because of Johnny Foreigner isn't it? But he is right about the 15%.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 13 Oct 17 6.01pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I bet Park Road is tearing his hair out at the direction this thread has taken.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Mapletree Croydon 13 Oct 17 6.13pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
But he is right about the 15%. SFW
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 13 Oct 17 6.17pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
SFW I know you don't like facts getting in the way of your rude and self righteous rants.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Kermit8  Hevon 13 Oct 17 6.30pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by npn
It should be spread. charge whatever percentage rate covers all the costs. Otherwise where does it stop? Do you just keep on hitting the lawyers until their take-home pay is the same as the shop workers? Surely that's communism (doesn't matter what job you do, you get your living expenses as dictated by the state) and that doesn't tend to end well Harsh. That's making the very much less well off less well off, in order to keep an assumed balance, which in itself is contradictory by subsidising the very much better off. Edited by Kermit8 (13 Oct 2017 6.30pm)
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| hedgehog50 Croydon 13 Oct 17 6.31pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
SFW Is that a Swedish expression?
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Kermit8 Hevon 13 Oct 17 6.31pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
I bet Park Road is tearing his hair out at the direction this thread has taken. There wasn't much hair left looking at the videos of the marchers tbf.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| hedgehog50 Croydon 13 Oct 17 6.32pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
Harsh. That's making the very much less well off less well off, in order to keep an assumed balance, which in itself is contradictory by subsidising the very much better off. Edited by Kermit8 (13 Oct 2017 6.30pm) Why do you think the Rolling Stones and many other high earners buggered off in the 1970s?
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Kermit8 Hevon 13 Oct 17 6.35pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Why do you think the Rolling Stones and many other high earners buggered off in the 1970s? You were an autograph hunter back then?
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Park Road  13 Oct 17 6.40pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
I bet Park Road is tearing his hair out at the direction this thread has taken. Not really, but thanks for your concern
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Park Road 13 Oct 17 6.41pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
There wasn't much hair left looking at the videos of the marchers tbf. Don't give up your day job
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 13 Oct 17 6.43pm |
 |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
The logic of progressive taxation is well established, higher earners can afford to pay in higher proportion as the basics in life have already been covered. You hit discretionary and not necessary expenditure. Sweden has a top tax rate of 56% plus 7% in pension contributions. People still stay there. In fact they appreciate the investments that are made for them as a result of the relatively high tax take. It's a very nice place to live and work. It's a very nice place to live because it's also a pretty small population with relatively large natural resources in comparison. It's not true to say that they there isn't dispute over their tax levels and the affordability of their system as its population increases. It's culturally mono outside of its immigrant areas and the problems of immigration have already started social cohesion problems....which are obviously just going to increase.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.