There are some big pieces of the jigsaw missing here - and of course it's reported in The Mail.
They say a reported loss of £125m over the past three years and the PSR rules say no more than £105m over three years. So why aren't we being charged. There may be an answer to that even if the £125m is correct eg Covid correction but I'm not sure it's all straightforward.
Yes the elusive new stand may feature. Borrowing against the increased revenue it will create once built.

I can see that the £125 million losses over 3 seasons
(£24.2 + £40 + £61.1 = £125.3) includes around £21 million Covid losses over 2 seasons 2019/20 + 20 / 21 -

I think that Covid losses are relevant to the financial accounts but they are not counted against FFP/ Profit & sustainability calculations -

Part of Evertons argument against FFP / Profit & sustainability in the first case revolved around how much they allocated against Covid losses (I forget the numbers but the amount of relief against losses that they claimed was substantially more than other clubs of the same / similar size)

Of course I am not an accountant but thats how it looks to me.

I believe it does

But then teams will know we are desperate to sell to balance the books and offer lower transfer fees

Whilst the only source for this story is the Mail it appears authoritative and based on knowledge. Unlike the spin which many Mail stories contain! How big and precisely why isn't said but it does look as though something is cooking behind the scenes and maybe we need short-term bridging finance to get someone in, before we move one, or more, out. Only time will tell, because the club won't.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Almost all football clubs lose money -
for some its more of a vanity project, for Palace at least we are trying to make it become a viable self sustaining business ( as much as is realistic) which is why:
a) We spent so much on the academy to gain class one status - i.e produce a production line of players to support the first team or be sold at a profit -
b) Reduce the %age of player wages against club revenue (I forget the actual numbers but it used to be something like 84% whereas its now 69% (ish)
c) Stay in the PL as it provides considerably higher income than the Championship + Improve position in the league as every place increases income by approximately £2.25 million
d) Upgrade main stand + 8000 seats + matchday revenue.
Obviously there are other initiatives but these are ones that come to mind immediately.
So whilst its not talked about on a daily basis I dont think its ever far from the shareholders thoughts.