This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Hrolf The Ganger 21 Mar 24 10.42am | |
---|---|
There is another way to look at this. Our society has only really know growth and so called progress. We managed perfectly well with a smaller population in the past and there were many advantages to it. Less traffic, no housing shortages, no strain on services etc. It seems to me that the main pressure to increase or even sustain population is financial and political. Our whole system could be adjusted to allow for decline in population growth. It could be done with the will to achieve it. Our ageing society will not become younger by introducing migrants. It is a short term solution that can only make the problem worse. Migrants get old too.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EverybodyDannsNow SE19 21 Mar 24 10.46am | |
---|---|
It’s impossibly expensive to have kids these days - address the generally extortionate cost of living as well as the ludicrous childcare fees, and that would go a long way to solving it. I’m recently married and in my early 30s and despite being at the upper end of earning percentiles, kids still feels an incredibly hard thing to afford and we have agreed to wait at least a couple of years. In your 20s it’s pretty much impossible without family support.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 21 Mar 24 10.54am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
It’s impossibly expensive to have kids these days - address the generally extortionate cost of living as well as the ludicrous childcare fees, and that would go a long way to solving it. I’m recently married and in my early 30s and despite being at the upper end of earning percentiles, kids still feels an incredibly hard thing to afford and we have agreed to wait at least a couple of years. In your 20s it’s pretty much impossible without family support. Agreed. My daughter and son-in-law both early 3Os, both have well paid jobs in the Space industry. Having just purchased a new house in West Sussex, and with a 16month old, without the daycare Nana and Grandad I’m not sure they would be able to afford it. Daycare costs are a disgrace and would not be worth both parents working.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EverybodyDannsNow SE19 21 Mar 24 10.59am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Agreed. My daughter and son-in-law both early 3Os, both have well paid jobs in the Space industry. Having just purchased a new house in West Sussex, and with a 16month old, without the daycare Nana and Grandad I’m not sure they would be able to afford it. Daycare costs are a disgrace and would not be worth both parents working. Yep, when we do go for it my mrs will have to drop out of work altogether for a while - unless you both earn north of £50k, I don’t see how you can justify the full-time childcare costs. It’s cheaper to lose a salary and do it yourself, which is just insanity. Something needs to give.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 21 Mar 24 11.00am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Firstly, the BBC don’t concentrate on Britain in the article because it isn’t about Britain. It’s about the bigger picture of worldwide trends and predictions in the most impacted countries. The idea that some places will see their populations halve by the end of the century will provoke a lot of debate. It’s a very interesting and useful analysis. It’s a pity your reaction is not. Yours is to repeat the same old mantra of “Europeans”, aka “white people”, being made extinct. There are some intriguing thoughts there. The idea that once every country’s population is declining that there will be competition for migrants would at least stop the small boat crisis! We will be sending aircraft to Ruanda to get people rather than removing them. With the probability of many more people in most countries having their racial roots in Africa the need to combat racism is highlighted. One thing above all others stands out. With the average age of the population going to increase dramatically, and the number of younger working age people outnumbered by the elderly, the concept of retirement is going to need revision. It seems to me that anticipating a period of non work at the end of your life, such as I am now enjoying, will become redundant. All those who can work will have to work until they no longer can. Society won’t function without them. Part time working, accepting the need to care for others and providing support services will become the duty of all, and not just those forced to do so by a lack of resources as now. With regard to your last paragraph, how are people in certain professions going to be able to continue working into their 70s? Firemen, Prison Officers, Scaffolders? to name just a few. Indeed my job where you are working 11-12 hour shifts ( including nights). If you leave those jobs who would want to employ someone of that age? Jeez, my son has been turned down for jobs because, at 25, he would have to be paid more than a 19yo. Never been told this officially, obviously but the reaction of employers when he advised of his age, to,d the story
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 21 Mar 24 11.02am | |
---|---|
Female fertility declines significantly in the thirties. Fertility mustn't be regarded as a given. It's also true that energy levels with parenting are also a factor. However, it's ultimately what we are here to do. Edited by Stirlingsays (21 Mar 2024 11.03am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 21 Mar 24 11.03am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
Yep, when we do go for it my mrs will have to drop out of work altogether for a while - unless you both earn north of £50k, I don’t see how you can justify the full-time childcare costs. It’s cheaper to lose a salary and do it yourself, which is just insanity. Something needs to give. My daughter has only had to drop down to 4 days because we are nearby to help. They also can work from home, so my hours are reduced
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EverybodyDannsNow SE19 21 Mar 24 11.09am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
My daughter has only had to drop down to 4 days because we are nearby to help. They also can work from home, so my hours are reduced one of the few jobs where I’d guess you wouldn’t mind the overtime!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 21 Mar 24 11.14am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
It’s impossibly expensive to have kids these days - address the generally extortionate cost of living as well as the ludicrous childcare fees, and that would go a long way to solving it. I’m recently married and in my early 30s and despite being at the upper end of earning percentiles, kids still feels an incredibly hard thing to afford and we have agreed to wait at least a couple of years. In your 20s it’s pretty much impossible without family support.
I have two grown up children. I would ideally have had more. My daughter has three. The alternative is to accept a smaller population where we pay more in order to pay for pensions, which we will all need at some point.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Behind Enemy Lines Sussex 21 Mar 24 11.16am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
Yep, when we do go for it my mrs will have to drop out of work altogether for a while - unless you both earn north of £50k, I don’t see how you can justify the full-time childcare costs. It’s cheaper to lose a salary and do it yourself, which is just insanity. Something needs to give. That's how it used to be. My wife gave up work to look after our children and never went back. We got by on one salary ever since.
hats off to palace, they were always gonna be louder, and hate to say it but they were impressive ALL bouncing and singing. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EverybodyDannsNow SE19 21 Mar 24 11.26am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I have two grown up children. I would ideally have had more. My daughter has three. The alternative is to accept a smaller population where we pay more in order to pay for pensions, which we will all need at some point. We also know there is a cost of living crisis and the average cost of a full time nursery place in London is 80% of the average monthly wage. It’s too easy to just talk about ‘managing’ when the income/cost ratios are objectively so much worse. I also don’t think it’s realistic to expect people to make such important life decisions based on population trends - I certainly won’t be.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 21 Mar 24 12.14pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
We also know there is a cost of living crisis and the average cost of a full time nursery place in London is 80% of the average monthly wage. It’s too easy to just talk about ‘managing’ when the income/cost ratios are objectively so much worse. I also don’t think it’s realistic to expect people to make such important life decisions based on population trends - I certainly won’t be. Everyone should have a choice of course, but I would say that having a larger family is ultimately far more rewarding than any other pastime or activity one might indulge in.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.