This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
madcap_v2 SE25 / Ibiza 27 Oct 23 11.59am | |
---|---|
For the implications it would have on the league and football, I hope this happens. However, for the implications this will have on the league, football and the likes of the forementioned Chelsea, Man City, Forest etc... I don't think this will happen. I don't even feel for Everton fans if it does, they would be happy the club are spending money to improve their standings in the league. Our deduction, we didn't even see the benefit of, we just had an incompetant owner who wasn't fit to run a bath, let alone a football club.
La la la your mum |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Goalpost1 Worcester Park 27 Oct 23 11.59am | |
---|---|
I think they'll end up losing 6 points because the powers that be will want to give them a chance to escape relegation. Even with their recent Houdini style acts in recent seasons it'd be a mountain for them to climb with a 12 points deduction. They'd need to be in the territory of playing to the level to get into Europe and they are nowhere near that.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 27 Oct 23 12.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Totally agree with you. No way Everton are going to get hammered, although I would love to see it A Toffee hammer?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Dubai Eagle 27 Oct 23 12.08pm | |
---|---|
Possibly reinforced by some kind of transfer embargo. Originally posted by Goalpost1
I think they'll end up losing 6 points because the powers that be will want to give them a chance to escape relegation. Even with their recent Houdini style acts in recent seasons it'd be a mountain for them to climb with a 12 points deduction. They'd need to be in the territory of playing to the level to get into Europe and they are nowhere near that.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
eaglesdare 27 Oct 23 1.35pm | |
---|---|
amazing that in italy clubs are regulary deducted points when they step out of line but The FA / premier league / "Powers that be" in england have no backbone.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
silvertop Portishead 27 Oct 23 3.06pm | |
---|---|
If convicted it will be a fine they can easily afford plus a transfer embargo so heavily conditioned as to be effectively worthless and it will be applied at the time most convenient to Everton.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
grumpymort US/Thailand/UK 27 Oct 23 3.08pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Dubai Eagle
I think our being docked 10 points was because we went into administration (there was no case to prove or answer to, it was a stone cold fact) so we had the points deducted almost immediately. But I am with you completely on the delays in administering these FFP charges, I am a firm believer that if someone breaks the rules they should have the punishment administered in the same season that the offence occurred to retain the integrity of the season ( or at least during the summer break so that the new season can start with a clean slate) otherwise as in this case you have 3 clubs waiting to sue Everton because they suffered relegation when ( if the FFP case is proven) one of them might have escaped relegation with Everton going down instead.
It is delayed because it's complex. Think of it as a trial you need to gather the evidence and present it to the other side first with a fair amount of clubs making it slow/difficult to even get all the records required. Look at Man City for example its been years and on purpose they are holding things up because they can afford to. Those clubs which have been relegated it's over and have no valid case you can't prove that by them spending more has changed any results and the same with if you argue if they had so many points they would have been relegated again you don't know that. It's messy and doesn't look good for the sport I expect some payments will be paid that is it. They need to make football in this country transparent too much hidden away everything when it comes to money side of things should be open (they wont do this because its another corrupt sport)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
YT Oxford 27 Oct 23 4.30pm | |
---|---|
I don't think they'll win the 'Most successful bit of cheating award'. Edited by YT (27 Oct 2023 5.45pm)
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 27 Oct 23 4.40pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
A Toffee hammer?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 27 Oct 23 4.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Goalpost1
I think they'll end up losing 6 points because the powers that be will want to give them a chance to escape relegation. Even with their recent Houdini style acts in recent seasons it'd be a mountain for them to climb with a 12 points deduction. They'd need to be in the territory of playing to the level to get into Europe and they are nowhere near that. Looking at the teams in PL this season I think I would risk accepting a 6 point deduction. Hopefully, if they appeal and lose, deduction is increased
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 27 Oct 23 5.16pm | |
---|---|
It's not enough to give them a 12 points deduction, to get rid of Andy Burnham you would have to relegate them.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Dubai Eagle 27 Oct 23 5.39pm | |
---|---|
I agree that its both complex & convoluted - The only way that I think it could work is if the PL employed say 4 full time sports specialized accountant / auditors, these accounts / auditors being responsible for say 5 clubs each, they work hand in hand with each club as sort of financial watchdogs throughout each season, so that at any given time there is a financial report available so it can be easily seen by club & PL if a club is within the rules or about to take a decision which will put them outside the rules so that this transparency provides the basis for any FFP charges. Of course it relies on the PL employing the right people & the clubs agreeing to allow complete transparency to these auditors throughout the clubs financial lifetime. I doubt it would happen & if it did it would probably just drive any underhand dealings deeper underground. Originally posted by grumpymort
It is delayed because it's complex. Think of it as a trial you need to gather the evidence and present it to the other side first with a fair amount of clubs making it slow/difficult to even get all the records required. Look at Man City for example its been years and on purpose they are holding things up because they can afford to. Those clubs which have been relegated it's over and have no valid case you can't prove that by them spending more has changed any results and the same with if you argue if they had so many points they would have been relegated again you don't know that. It's messy and doesn't look good for the sport I expect some payments will be paid that is it. They need to make football in this country transparent too much hidden away everything when it comes to money side of things should be open (they wont do this because its another corrupt sport)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.