This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
SnapperKain SE25 6PU 22 Mar 23 9.42am | |
---|---|
I get we're all frustrated, god knows I am after watching the football we played last season versus this one, but without a backer to plough tens if not hundreds of millions into the club, what do people realistically expect Parish to do? I know a lot of people say we should all "stop going on about the past" but the fact of the matter is that 13 odd years ago we were a gnats wing away from going out of existence. We somehow managed to stay in the Championship and then against the odds made it into the Prem where we've enjoyed 10 years (and hopefully 11!) of residency. That doesn't happen with a sh!te chairman, you can't have that much luck. Granted the lack of not having a decent striker or retaining Gallagher (or a clone) is something that questions need asking on, but I would wager that the answer would be simply that we don't have the funds for anyone who could hit the ground running in the Prem. There's always people with potential, but we've tried that and ended up with Mateta and Édouard, to guarantee a proven striker in the prem costs silly money. We've not been taken over or backed by a bored billionaire, where does everyone think the money is coming from? Parish has brough in these investors, have they injected billions? No, but he has brought them in in an attempt to get more money into the club and they've bank rolled the Academy and Vieira's spending spree last season. Parish doesn't have the money to bank roll a prem club (ala Tony Bloom) and we all saw what happened with Goldberg and Jordan when you plough your entire fortune into a football club. I don't buy the argument that we shouldn't invest funds into the ground either, the main stand is probably close to falling down given the age of it and we hardly market ourselves as a top notch prem team when we try and get players in and they see the ground. Don't even start on the bogs and food and drink for the fans (I'm in the Arthur ) it all needs a desperate upgrade and that costs money. I'm genuinely interested to know what people think Parish should do differently and I mean realistically not this b0llocks of "Parish has to go and sell to a billionaire" which seems to be the main thrust of people's suggestions. I'm sure if an unknown Palace fan with deep pockets suddenly wanted to buy the club that Parish would step aside from ownership, but I don't see one, do you? And with the Vieira/Hodgson stuff, personally I'm not excited to see Roy back, but I'll support him nonetheless. Again though, if Parish had backed Vieira and we'd got relegated then everyone would of said he should of sacked him and he's an idiot for not doing that and the response will likely be the same if Roy doesn't keep us up and everyone says we should of stayed with Vieira. No win situation (and I'm not talking about the results for the rest of the season..). Rant over.
The trouble with computers, of course, is that they're very sophisticated idiots |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 22 Mar 23 10.01am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by sydtheeagle
So. f***ing. What. People keep saying this in defense of Parish, like it's some sort of "get out of jail free" card. It's not. There are 36,000 people who love the club at Selhurst Park every week. Their passion cannot be doubted. I wouldn't want 35,999 of them managing the team or directing the company (if you're wondering, the comedy value of Willo in the dugout is the exception). I don't give a f*** if Parish loves the club. I just want him to be competent at his job. If anyone really loved the club surely they'd do whatever was best for the club outside of their individual involvement or interests? I don't want to slate Parish to the extent others have, firstly for what he has achieved but secondly as it would be with limited insight but it seems less and less as though he is acting in the best interests of Palace and more and more his own. He does not have the financial clout to move the club forward and I cannot see a model whereby he remains in control of all things whilst spending others' money, which is what he seems to be trying to orchestrate. It is Gollum-esque with him desperately clinging to control of Palace which at this stage only ever comes across as obstructive to progress. The original argument for him, from what I gathered, was built upon fear of Palace's continual existential crisis whereby he was some sort of guardian and fan representing saviour. That's all becoming somewhat old hat, irrelevant and less workable now but furthermore looks as though it may contribute to another demise. I also think it dangerous he seems so involved in the footballing side of things, that shouldn't be his place. There must come a point where he has to step aside and say 'I've done all I can do and get out of this situation, but trying to compete with Saudi et al money is way out of my league'. We may well be way out of the league at that point too however. I am happy for all this to be rubbished btw if nonsense, just my thoughts on things.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
YT Oxford 22 Mar 23 11.43am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SwordFish
Brilliant that post has made me spit my tea and cheered me up Literally still laughing , most I’ve laughed all week Edited by SwordFish (22 Mar 2023 9.31am) I thank yow!
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
YT Oxford 22 Mar 23 11.49am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Slimey Toad
Well, we are stuck in the Mud Sweet!
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Far away fan On the border of jungle 22 Mar 23 11.51am | |
---|---|
Doesn't matter who the manager is next season, not enough money put in to buying players next season, no new stadium if we go down back to square one, no stadium that is never going to happen, the club needs a change off direction, Parish is past his sell buy date
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
MrRobbo Chaldon 22 Mar 23 12.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Far away fan
Doesn't matter who the manager is next season, not enough money put in to buying players next season, no new stadium if we go down back to square one, no stadium that is never going to happen, the club needs a change off direction, Parish is past his sell buy date Sure it would help. Pretty sure Brentford's first 11 cost somewhere in the region of £55m. And I remember a stat early this year after Brighton beat Everton, that their team cost less than Iwobi. There are bargains everywhere. We jsut need to get better at it. A few Brighton examples: Mitoma - £2.5m The difference being, that because Brighton have a decent team, they can afford to buy young and cheap. We have such a poor squad that we need bodies in the first team immediately
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dreamwaverider London 22 Mar 23 12.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SnapperKain
I get we're all frustrated, god knows I am after watching the football we played last season versus this one, but without a backer to plough tens if not hundreds of millions into the club, what do people realistically expect Parish to do? I know a lot of people say we should all "stop going on about the past" but the fact of the matter is that 13 odd years ago we were a gnats wing away from going out of existence. We somehow managed to stay in the Championship and then against the odds made it into the Prem where we've enjoyed 10 years (and hopefully 11!) of residency. That doesn't happen with a sh!te chairman, you can't have that much luck. Granted the lack of not having a decent striker or retaining Gallagher (or a clone) is something that questions need asking on, but I would wager that the answer would be simply that we don't have the funds for anyone who could hit the ground running in the Prem. There's always people with potential, but we've tried that and ended up with Mateta and Édouard, to guarantee a proven striker in the prem costs silly money. We've not been taken over or backed by a bored billionaire, where does everyone think the money is coming from? Parish has brough in these investors, have they injected billions? No, but he has brought them in in an attempt to get more money into the club and they've bank rolled the Academy and Vieira's spending spree last season. Parish doesn't have the money to bank roll a prem club (ala Tony Bloom) and we all saw what happened with Goldberg and Jordan when you plough your entire fortune into a football club. I don't buy the argument that we shouldn't invest funds into the ground either, the main stand is probably close to falling down given the age of it and we hardly market ourselves as a top notch prem team when we try and get players in and they see the ground. Don't even start on the bogs and food and drink for the fans (I'm in the Arthur ) it all needs a desperate upgrade and that costs money. I'm genuinely interested to know what people think Parish should do differently and I mean realistically not this b0llocks of "Parish has to go and sell to a billionaire" which seems to be the main thrust of people's suggestions. I'm sure if an unknown Palace fan with deep pockets suddenly wanted to buy the club that Parish would step aside from ownership, but I don't see one, do you? And with the Vieira/Hodgson stuff, personally I'm not excited to see Roy back, but I'll support him nonetheless. Again though, if Parish had backed Vieira and we'd got relegated then everyone would of said he should of sacked him and he's an idiot for not doing that and the response will likely be the same if Roy doesn't keep us up and everyone says we should of stayed with Vieira. No win situation (and I'm not talking about the results for the rest of the season..). Rant over.
Tony Bloom is a one off and will become better and better known as brighton continue their extraordinary march. It's not just where they are now, but how they have got there that is staggering. Bloom is way ahead of most other football club owners. He has positioned himself in such a strong position and now holds over 98% of Brighton FC, while his pockets continue to deepen on the back of Star Lizard. Contrarily, we are in an unenviable position of no one holding the reins, and it would appear our various shareholders not sharing much if any mutual common ground. To stay on track with where football is heading is not going to be easy for us, and unless Harris and or Blitzer grab a hold of Palace which seems very unlikely, our only real hope to get out of what is looking like treacle would be to hope and pray a guardian angel turns up. I also enjoy a seat in the Arfur cattle shed and even enjoy the feeling of going back in time at every home game.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
hythemaceagle Hythe Kent 22 Mar 23 1.09pm | |
---|---|
Last season the board backed Vieira. This season they haven’t, and look at the difference. I’m absolutely flabbergasted that the board didn’t see the sense in backing him this season, which they clearly haven’t.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 22 Mar 23 1.59pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by hythemaceagle
The board seem to take the fans for granted. None of us are kept informed. Unless you wear black and bang a drum
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SarfNorwoodAl South Norwood 22 Mar 23 2.23pm | |
---|---|
We need to do what the Everton fans are doing and protest about the board. I am sure the HF can organise something outside the ground with flares and banners etc. Parrish will listen if he thinks his beloved mini or barnet are going to get damaged.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 22 Mar 23 2.27pm | |
---|---|
The press seem to be releasing more and more shambolic and depressing stories. Sounds farcical. I guess what do you expect when your Director of Football and Chairman are as inexperienced as ours. A good, solid DoF wouldn't go astray for us. Edited by ASCPFC (22 Mar 2023 2.27pm)
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
babylonjohn St Leonards-on-Sea 22 Mar 23 3.24pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SnapperKain
I get we're all frustrated, god knows I am after watching the football we played last season versus this one, but without a backer to plough tens if not hundreds of millions into the club, what do people realistically expect Parish to do? I know a lot of people say we should all "stop going on about the past" but the fact of the matter is that 13 odd years ago we were a gnats wing away from going out of existence. We somehow managed to stay in the Championship and then against the odds made it into the Prem where we've enjoyed 10 years (and hopefully 11!) of residency. That doesn't happen with a sh!te chairman, you can't have that much luck. Granted the lack of not having a decent striker or retaining Gallagher (or a clone) is something that questions need asking on, but I would wager that the answer would be simply that we don't have the funds for anyone who could hit the ground running in the Prem. There's always people with potential, but we've tried that and ended up with Mateta and Édouard, to guarantee a proven striker in the prem costs silly money. We've not been taken over or backed by a bored billionaire, where does everyone think the money is coming from? Parish has brough in these investors, have they injected billions? No, but he has brought them in in an attempt to get more money into the club and they've bank rolled the Academy and Vieira's spending spree last season. Parish doesn't have the money to bank roll a prem club (ala Tony Bloom) and we all saw what happened with Goldberg and Jordan when you plough your entire fortune into a football club. I don't buy the argument that we shouldn't invest funds into the ground either, the main stand is probably close to falling down given the age of it and we hardly market ourselves as a top notch prem team when we try and get players in and they see the ground. Don't even start on the bogs and food and drink for the fans (I'm in the Arthur ) it all needs a desperate upgrade and that costs money. I'm genuinely interested to know what people think Parish should do differently and I mean realistically not this b0llocks of "Parish has to go and sell to a billionaire" which seems to be the main thrust of people's suggestions. I'm sure if an unknown Palace fan with deep pockets suddenly wanted to buy the club that Parish would step aside from ownership, but I don't see one, do you? And with the Vieira/Hodgson stuff, personally I'm not excited to see Roy back, but I'll support him nonetheless. Again though, if Parish had backed Vieira and we'd got relegated then everyone would of said he should of sacked him and he's an idiot for not doing that and the response will likely be the same if Roy doesn't keep us up and everyone says we should of stayed with Vieira. No win situation (and I'm not talking about the results for the rest of the season..). Rant over.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.