Sorry ASCPFC but that was definitely (intended as) the general sentiment behind what I was saying.

I'd soon rather watch 'our lot' playing against 'them lot', including all their fans, in the nation's league system, dirty burgers, p!ssing down with rain et al than the Emirates Reds playing the Yank Blues with Popcorn and hog roast seat delivery service in a state of the art arena.

I'm not saying that's correct by any stretch just my preference and I'd hold no grudge against those who choose or prefer the other.

'Let them 'av their Super League'. More 'Good riddance' than 'Oh no' from me.

Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Does anyone else think that the words, shady, seedings & UEFA go very well together in the same sentence -

Yes (although UEFA isn't a word )

Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

I think its quite pessimistic as well as actually unrealistic for anyone to think a Super League is inevitable. Yes the top 6/7 have a lot of power but collectively so do the remaining 13/14 clubs in the league. Not to mention the other 72 EFL clubs that will fight it, the fans (of ALL clubs) as well as the FA, the Premier League, UEFA, FIFA as well as governments of the world will fight against this type of selfish greed.
Of course greedy men at the top such as Levy, the Glazers, Stan Kroanke, etc will look at ways to get a bigger slice of TV money. Levy even had the nerve to tell all PL member cubs that Spurs attracts a bigger TV audience therefore should get more money recently. Yet it was the owners of Chelsea (Ken Bates, Palace (Ron Noades), & Man United (Martin Edwards) who not only thought up the idea of the Premier League but were the only club chairmen at the time to back the idea with their money. Spurs owner at the time (Irving Schollar) was actually against the idea.
People will always be greedy. Its the way of things. Greed rarely wins when there is so much opposition to it and so few will prosper from their plans.

Wouldn't a super league be better for us? Ideally, wouldn't we want to compete against clubs in a more or less fair setting? As long as City, United, Arsenal, Chelsea, Spurs, Liverpool, and now Newcastle, can buy all the best players, then what are we playing for? Ideally, we have one lucky season out of ten, finish in the top six, and get to play in Europe for one season? That's it?

The Premier League structure is broken in favor of the top clubs, so if they want to all F off to their own league, I'd welcome it. Good riddance. ManU can play PSG, Barcelona, and Juventus every Saturday, instead of beating up on Southampton, Bournemouth, and us.

In general, we have 7 out of 20 PL clubs with so much money, they can't be relegated. So you have 13 clubs fighting over 3 relegation spots. 3 relegation spots out of 20 clubs is reasonable, but 3 relegation spots out of 13 clubs makes no sense. At the very least, reduce the relegation spots to 2, and/or make one of the spots a playoff where the club from the PL plays the club from the Championship to determine if the Championship club gets promoted.

2017 Feb. (Van Aanholt) Palace 1 - 0 Middlesboro
2018 Jan. (Sako) Palace 1 - 0 Burnley
2019 May (Batshuayi, Batshuayi, OG, Van Aanholt, Townsend) Palace 5 - 3 Bournemouth
2020 Feb. (Van Aanholt) Palace 1 - 0 Newcastle

The super league is a great idea, the like of Liverpool can get thumped week in week out by the creme de la creme of European sides - what's not to like?