This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
EverybodyDannsNow SE19 10 Aug 22 6.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nhp61
Obviously someone who can't recognise sarcasm. Maybe I should have warned, "the next sentence contains sarcasm"
It's probably more tongue in cheek, than sarcasm, but that doesn't change my point: most commentary around woke starts with "soon they'll be..." "next it will be..." "I wouldn't be surprised if they start..."
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EverybodyDannsNow SE19 10 Aug 22 6.23pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Replace the word "programme" with "post". "I'm waiting for an announcer warning Eastenders viewers that "this post contains people laughing and smiling which may offend miserable b******s on some social media platforms". I've done it - it makes even less sense.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 10 Aug 22 7.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
"I'm waiting for an announcer warning Eastenders viewers that "this post contains people laughing and smiling which may offend miserable b******s on some social media platforms". I've done it - it makes even less sense. I see. Try again.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
TheBigToePunt 10 Aug 22 7.20pm | |
---|---|
My first reaction to this report was similar to those above, but upon reflection there is a world of difference between giving a book a warning label and banning it. From what I have read, universities have done the former rather than the latter. We've had a 'rating' or a parental advisory system for films and music for decades, and its not only fine, but a good idea in the main. So long as books remain available, a label warning you that you might find the contents challenging, upsetting, or whatever, doesn't matter and might, in some cases, increase interest and/or allow a book into places it couldn't reach otherwise. Example: I read The Lord of the Flies to my son a couple of years ago. I vaguely remembered enjoying it when we studied it at school in the early 90s. At one point one of the characters (a 1940s schoolboy) uses the N word when accusing other boys of acting like savages. Apparently some versions have the N word, some have the word Indians, and other versions (including, presumably, the one I studied at school) have the word Savages. In different ways these alterations represent interference with the text, censorship, and effect the books value as an historical artefact. However, the great power of the book is its central theme, which is wholly unaffected by the alteration. What that simple alteration does do is allow this brilliant, deep, engrossing book to be read to kids in schools (which it is). They can then consider the issues it raises, perhaps including the fact there are different versions (both the slur and the sentence it sits in are not at all central to the book in my opinion, but others may disagree), and read the original version if they choose. So long as the original version remains available, and it is possible to tell which version one is reading, that little bit of consideration of what is appropriate opens the whole book, and the ideas it contains, up to more people. Finally, one University claims to have replaced one or two 'warning label' books from course reading lists (rather than removed them) because other books are more useful to the subjects. If that's true then these reports are adding two and two and getting five. Wokeism and the hyper-offended can cause serious problems that must be challenged, but I'd be wary of the growing industry in overreaction and misrepresentation before concluding that the nations universities have gone to s***. Edited by TheBigToePunt (10 Aug 2022 7.43pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
JRW2 Dulwich 11 Aug 22 11.07am | |
---|---|
I see that Sir Trevor Phillips, former Chairman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission and Chairman of the Index on Censorship, which campaigns for freedom of expression, has described the universities' action as "fatuous, patronising and profoundly racist".
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 11 Aug 22 11.57am | |
---|---|
I think books that have warning labels attached should read: If you are offended or upset by anything in this book you failed to reach the maturity, intelligence and common sense/logic/understanding of reality that is requisite of grown adults. Please seek urgent psychological care. Edited by Nicholas91 (11 Aug 2022 11.58am)
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 11 Aug 22 2.25pm | |
---|---|
It probably is about time that the long words are redacted and the books are printed in emojis for degree students, or text speech for Masters.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Pete53 Hassocks 11 Aug 22 2.50pm | |
---|---|
I am always a bit reluctant to immediately accept some of the reports on "wokeism" and apparent attempts to censor this, or that. Certain elements of the press are only too happy to come up with wildly inaccurate stories. In recent years we have been treated to a catalogue of examples of "health and safety gone made" and what absurdities the EU were imposing on us, much of it being untrue or wildly exaggerated. But it makes for good stories and re-enforces peoples beliefs and prejudices, and, worryingly, can enter the public domain as a truth. That's not to say that there is not some silliness going on. The trouble is that these days a fairly small segment of society, using social media, can create the impression that they are a much larger and significant movement than they actually are. They operate a concerted and repeated campaign against an individual or organisation, to achieve their ends, with demands for justice, retractions and apologies. The target of this intimidation, frightened of retribution be it being labelled racist, misogynistic, transphobic, being shamed, or having protesters on their doorstep, often take the easy route capitulate. hTe perpetrators can then claim that the target of their campaign has admitted "guilt".
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 11 Aug 22 5.10pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Pete53
I am always a bit reluctant to immediately accept some of the reports on "wokeism" and apparent attempts to censor this, or that. Certain elements of the press are only too happy to come up with wildly inaccurate stories. In recent years we have been treated to a catalogue of examples of "health and safety gone made" and what absurdities the EU were imposing on us, much of it being untrue or wildly exaggerated. But it makes for good stories and re-enforces peoples beliefs and prejudices, and, worryingly, can enter the public domain as a truth. That's not to say that there is not some silliness going on. The trouble is that these days a fairly small segment of society, using social media, can create the impression that they are a much larger and significant movement than they actually are. They operate a concerted and repeated campaign against an individual or organisation, to achieve their ends, with demands for justice, retractions and apologies. The target of this intimidation, frightened of retribution be it being labelled racist, misogynistic, transphobic, being shamed, or having protesters on their doorstep, often take the easy route capitulate. hTe perpetrators can then claim that the target of their campaign has admitted "guilt". A lot of sense in there Pete! I too often get wound up when reading such things but should any of us (men) feel the urge to be called 'madam', wear hot pants and a bikini top (beer belly hanging out) and make demands in most establishments and fire accusations at any erring from what some decree as correct speech, I would be inclined to believe we'd at best be subject, again at the very least, to some ridicule etc. The internet can be a very wild, scary and bemusing place. Getting stuck in front of a screen can give you a distorted view of the world however I frequently venture into Kent, and back down to Lewisham/Peckham/Plumstead (family) and more often than not it seems pretty much as it always did, with a few newer/repainted buildings. I do worry for a younger generation who's worldview will be entirely crafted online sometimes. We see many adults succumb to it these days too.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PalazioVecchio south pole 11 Aug 22 11.17pm | |
---|---|
I find Karl marx and most feminist writers very offensive. Can we get the cops to scramble the helicopters ?
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 11 Aug 22 11.28pm | |
---|---|
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 12 Aug 22 12.49am | |
---|---|
Poster on here are really slow to grasp the new reality about the culture wars/wokeness. call it what you will. The woke brigade believe you are entitled to their opinion, not yours, and if they believe something then it is a fact. It's quite extraordinary that a very loud minority have managed to ferment a culture of fear where people will not speak for fear of losing their job.
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.