This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
cryrst The garden of England 12 Jan 22 7.52pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by croydon proud
You just don"t get it, they wont spend on the privatised drugs as they are to expensive and would rather bandage 10 peoples arms- thats 10 happy customers- rather than the one life saving op- looks better in the accounts.Take off those blue tinted specs ! Apart from by not bandaging the arm they might have two deaths.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
orpingtoneagle Orpington 12 Jan 22 9.42pm | |
---|---|
We have universal health care medicine mostly free at the point of delivery via the NHS. This model would make it hard for the service to be run as anything but a nationalised service. Ok we can take two very real examples of where public and private try to co exist in universal healthcare. GP's are mostly self employed and some are so overworked they are no longer able to provide a service. I know a few and for them it is not a money issue. It is simply they do not have enough hours in the day. They are so reliant on other non existent services they have taken up as much slack as they can. Dentists meanwhile will often not provide an NHS service as it is far more profitable to run a private one. (Despite NHS dental fees being too expensive for those who probably really need them.) Back in the day National Insurance was a levy to pay for things like the NHS, increasingly now that pot as more akin to general taxation. Maybe we should go back to ring fenced funding of the NHS. I wonder if folks would miss as many appointments if they understood the costs.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badadmcmad Leeds 12 Jan 22 9.55pm | |
---|---|
I wonder if it occurs to people, generally, that the Tories are big fans of privatisation and indeed have been privatising a lot of the NHS over the years. They are also responsible for the record waiting list times - despite the money being thrown at the NHS (well, more and more syphoned quickly to the private sector). Also, worth noting that the private sector which receives billions from NHS contracts also are involved in billion pound litigations against the NHS over contract issues (Virgin Health). The point is, that the NHS is struggling because it's not being directed properly and that is more than likely deliberate. If you think privatisation is a good thing, where is the extreme example of such a system? The US...? The NHS is very efficient. This is why the vaccine rollout went well once the NHS took over from Tory corporate buddies. Originally posted by cryrst
So mention privatising the NHS and loads go in to melt down about care at point of need etc etc. The NHS is too big to fail but to big to succeed. It is an inefficient dinosaur wasting money and not fulfilling its potential. (CP this isn't about the recent dosh ) Most staff are wonderful people with caring being the prime reason for working in said NHS.
D'oh! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 12 Jan 22 10.30pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
So mention privatising the NHS and loads go in to melt down about care at point of need etc etc. The NHS is too big to fail but to big to succeed. It is an inefficient dinosaur wasting money and not fulfilling its potential. (CP this isn't about the recent dosh ) Most staff are wonderful people with caring being the prime reason for working in said NHS. This seems to suggest that the private sector is not already heavily involved in the NHS. Estimates vary that between 25% and 40% of its budget is spent via the private sector. Which is already substantial by any measurement. Some ambulance services, for instance, are privatised. It's a question of common sense. If using the profit motive produces hard work and efficiency, go for it. If it results in cutting corners, stressing staff, reducing care quality and lengthening waits then don't. That generally means that support services can be privatised whilst clinical provisions ought not to be.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The Dolphin 13 Jan 22 7.20am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by kingdowieonthewall
absolutely. Me too!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 14 Jan 22 12.55pm | |
---|---|
My first adult job was as admin in the NHS. Hilarious title of deceased patient's property, I also did the wages and petty cash,and gave out 'pocket money' from the welfare of longer term patients. There were three in total in my office. We had five managers. I presume it hasn't changed much in that regard. Of course, the hospital used to do a lot then, but very little now. Just minor procedures. Not even A & E which is 30 miles away on packed roads. Edited by ASCPFC (14 Jan 2022 12.56pm)
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 16 Mar 22 7.46am | |
---|---|
My neighbour has prostrate cancer and had it removed. He was then having regular scans to check if they had got it all. I saw him yesterday the cancer has now spread to his pelvis and requires more aggressive treatment e.g. Chemo. What is really upsetting him is that the NHS knew this from his last scan over 2 months ago. So having taking over 2 months to tell him the operation hadn't worked when they knew back then he now has to join a waiting list for chemo, yet more delays. Understandably he is now fearful that it is too late and the cancer has spread too far. I hope this is not a common occurrence but you do wonder with the NHS. Edited by Badger11 (16 Mar 2022 7.47am)
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 16 Mar 22 9.04am | |
---|---|
In the real world, my experience of my local hospitals tells me that they are disgracefully run by often underqualified people with little or no communication or organisation and with too few staff. The net result is a service that is not fit for purpose. I despair at the amount of people who must die unnecessarily due to misdiagnosis, poor treatment or incorrect or unnecessary medication. Something has to change.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 16 Mar 22 9.22am | |
---|---|
Having recently spent a very large period of time in hospital I can say this without any hesitation and all sincerity, outside of London I did start to feel that the term hospital was loosely applied to any large buildings where sick people are kept and occasionally checked in on (in Kent). That may not reflect the entire country but I was genuinely shocked by the state of some of the hospitals I stayed in, the staff there (most of whom are genuinely good willed however just seemed a 'bit thick' at best) and the overall level of treatment. This isn't an exaggeration, but often other blokes on the wards would ask for my assistance, despite being barely able to walk myself, as ringing their bedside buzzers very rarely gained any attention and certainly not swiftly. Even upon returning to KCH in London, where amongst many things I did have on my sheet that I suffered from 'Heamochromatosis', I was questioned as to where I had been diagnosed with this supposedly hereditary disorder. My answer was "here, you told me here I suffered with that". I have received hospital inpatient care in the past and always thought it was fantastic, professional, safe, trustworthy etc etc. My recent experience was horrendous and genuinely shocking (as in unexpected). Might be COVID affected who knows.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
eritheagle Erith 16 Mar 22 9.24am | |
---|---|
I received a letter last week with a date for an appointment at the ENT department at Queen Elizabeth hospital having been referred before Christmas. I was given date in June and I played it down when people said that’s a long time to wait as I didn’t think 3 month wait was that bad. So I went to write it on my calendar when I realised I couldn’t as my calendar only goes up to December 2022!!!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 16 Mar 22 9.38am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
In the real world, my experience of my local hospitals tells me that they are disgracefully run by often underqualified people with little or no communication or organisation and with too few staff. The net result is a service that is not fit for purpose. I despair at the amount of people who must die unnecessarily due to misdiagnosis, poor treatment or incorrect or unnecessary medication. Something has to change. Agreed. My neighbour has no way of knowing how serious his cancer is although as it is spreading that is never a good sign. He could have been sent for treatment 2 months ago if they had looked at his scan. Prostrate cancer is now one of the main killers of men most blokes don't do anything until it is too late, in this case I know my neighbour started having tests 5 years ago as he knew something was wrong. At the time it was a watch and wait and probably the right decision because it is notoriously difficult to confirm there are a lot of false positives. Then last year it was confirmed and he had his prostrate removed. The delays have been in his follow up treatment which should have been radiotherapy for 30 days, that train has left the station so now it's a hail Mary prayer with chemo and a hope that it doesn't go to stage 4. Poor sod.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 16 Mar 22 11.38am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
Agreed. My neighbour has no way of knowing how serious his cancer is although as it is spreading that is never a good sign. He could have been sent for treatment 2 months ago if they had looked at his scan. Prostrate cancer is now one of the main killers of men most blokes don't do anything until it is too late, in this case I know my neighbour started having tests 5 years ago as he knew something was wrong. At the time it was a watch and wait and probably the right decision because it is notoriously difficult to confirm there are a lot of false positives. Then last year it was confirmed and he had his prostrate removed. The delays have been in his follow up treatment which should have been radiotherapy for 30 days, that train has left the station so now it's a hail Mary prayer with chemo and a hope that it doesn't go to stage 4. Poor sod. I too have prostate cancer. Having had a prostatectomy (removal) in 2010 and been told, after a few years, I was cancer free, it came back again. Radiotherapy seemed to halt it, but then it came back a second time. Now I am waiting again myself, but not because of NHS delays, but for the cancer to grow large enough to know exactly where it is, so it can be targetted efficiently. Obviously, I don't know neighbour's precise details, but chemo for prostate cancer is not the usual treatment. It's usually quite slow growing and difficult to locate precisely. Radiotherapy is more usual, with hormone treatment to slow down any reoccurrence. Maybe that's what is being considered. My experience has been very good all the way through. I have a telephone line I can call at anytime to get advice or appointments advanced. There are also new treatments coming through, which give us all reasons to be hopeful. If you think a chat with a fellow sufferer would help your neighbour, send me a PM and I will give you my number.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.