I'm fine with people holding any view with regard to immigration policy and with it representing the will of the people. That has always been my stance and anything to the contrary is inaccurate. I have never been in any way, shape or form a fan of mass immigration.

My issue with the leader of Patriotic Alterative is that he is a neo nazi, who has reveled in the deaths of black Africans and gay people from AIDS calling it a 'friendly disease' on account of who tends to die from it. He called the holocaust 'the single most overhyped event in history' and suggested it didn't happen. This is a man who happily posed with his Swaztika covered gf back in the day and has links to numerous high profile self identifying white supremacists. I could easily point to examples where the OP has an uncommon and unhealthy attitude towards some of the same groups, but that is besides the point really.

I find it unfortunate that the OP knows all of this and yet has repeatedly treated this guy with an absurdly light touch to the point of highlighting his new, in my view, 'gateway' type party (which also targets children - as if Mark Collet is babysitter material), whereas members of the board who have mundane and mainstream political outlooks are treated as if they're the ones indulging in fringe outlooks and behaviours.

Palace fans come in all colours and creeds, so if we're now showcasing parties led by neo nazis it's a sad state of affairs. That's my take anyway. I'll leave it for others to decide what they think of this figure and his party. At least they will be aware of precisely who they're getting into bed with.

OK Dan, so which part of that do you object to and why?

Calm down were all palace!. Just have a small problem of my own. I'm surrounded by Liverpool fans. Plz help x

That sort of Danism is not sufficient.

I want to know in detail what issues you have with that manifesto.

You have all day, I'm busy.

Calm down were all palace!. Just have a small problem of my own. I'm surrounded by Liverpool fans. Plz help x