This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 05 Aug 21 12.07pm | |
---|---|
Probably about 3 years ago I had heard that Nelson was considered the best product of the Arsenal academy since Jack Wilshere. Edited by Willo (05 Aug 2021 12.15pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
silvertop Portishead 05 Aug 21 2.53pm | |
---|---|
You might want to try and come round to the idea as this kid seems the most likely to come in as one of the of the final 3 positions allegedly sought.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 05 Aug 21 3.11pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
You might want to try and come round to the idea as this kid seems the most likely to come in as one of the of the final 3 positions allegedly sought. Speaking to some supporters the other day, they were certainly not enthusiastic about the club acquiring Nelson.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 05 Aug 21 4.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
Speaking to some supporters the other day, they were certainly not enthusiastic about the club acquiring Nelson. Why not? Who do “they” think we should get. Do you and your friends ever have anything positive to say about Palace
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Omph Liverpool 05 Aug 21 4.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
Probably about 3 years ago I had heard that Nelson was considered the best product of the Arsenal academy since Jack Wilshere. Edited by Willo (05 Aug 2021 12.15pm) Not sure I see the problem here At one level you can point to Saka and say yes of course. At another level it simply points to the fact he has fallen down the pecking order but has great talent. It's not as if he's been tried and failed numerous times. Then there's any number of players who have switched clubs at an early and gone onto bigger things. Gnabry is an extreme case in point. You could even argue for Rak Sakyi from Chelsea as another example here (still to be proven that one of course)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Omph Liverpool 14 Aug 21 9.34am | |
---|---|
Interesting that he got minutes last night against Brentford. Arsenal are of course down to the bare bones with both Lacazette and Auba out for now and Nketiah also down for a while. Could still happen I suppose but could surely only be a deadline day move
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
TheBigToePunt 14 Aug 21 10.40am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Omph
Interesting that he got minutes last night against Brentford. Arsenal are of course down to the bare bones with both Lacazette and Auba out for now and Nketiah also down for a while. Could still happen I suppose but could surely only be a deadline day move He did indeed get on last night. At one point he joined in with a dangerous arsenal attack at a time when they really needed a goal, and played a lovely weighted pass into space. So much space in fact that there wasn't a single arsenal player anywhere near it, and hadn't been for ages. He may not have had many chances at arsenal, but he's been on loan and done very little. What exactly makes him an asset to us? Prior to that I watched Chambers, another with whom we have been linked on and off, follow up a needlessly hashed clearance by immediately getting soundly and easily beaten by Canos for Brentfords opener. Arsenals highly rated young forward Balogun was subbed off having had the least touches of the ball of anyone on the pitch. He is apparently considered to be above Nketiah by his club, hence the apparent availability to us of latter. Overlook the big club 'brand' associated with players we are linked with, and look at what the player has actually achieved. Arsenal have slowly worked their way down into mid table for a reason. Their players aren't very good. Maitland-Niles, who was our best player at the Emirates last season, is so bad he can't even get into this mid table shower,yet he apparently comes with a £15m and upwards price tag. How? Why? Which test have any of these players passed to establish their value to us? Edited by TheBigToePunt (14 Aug 2021 10.41am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Omph Liverpool 14 Aug 21 11.16am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by TheBigToePunt
Generally agree with the thrust of your argument here but the other variable here is Arteta. I suspect loads of Arsenal fans would point the finger at him as much as the players. His selections are frequently baffling. Think there's still room to pick up players on the basis of "right player but underperforming because of wrong club/manager". Some (?most) players only really thrive once they get a run and that just doesn't happen at Arsenal. We've done well in the past by picking up that sort of fringe player after all. Just don't know near enough about Nelson one way or another myself to form a proper judgement. Certainly wouldn't be paying the top 6 premium to get him in though. Edit: To some extent I imagine budget restraints mean that we are almost inevitably bound by choosing between one of these two constraints: 1. wrong club: ie a player with no significant PL experience - gamble on foreign or champo form We did get Andersen but even he cost the thick end of 20 mill no? Great buy you'd think but still not cheap and I'm guessing we're stretching to make another similar purchase. Edited by Omph (14 Aug 2021 11.36am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
samprior Hamburg 14 Aug 21 12.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by TheBigToePunt
He did indeed get on last night. At one point he joined in with a dangerous arsenal attack at a time when they really needed a goal, and played a lovely weighted pass into space. So much space in fact that there wasn't a single arsenal player anywhere near it, and hadn't been for ages. He may not have had many chances at arsenal, but he's been on loan and done very little. What exactly makes him an asset to us? Prior to that I watched Chambers, another with whom we have been linked on and off, follow up a needlessly hashed clearance by immediately getting soundly and easily beaten by Canos for Brentfords opener. Arsenals highly rated young forward Balogun was subbed off having had the least touches of the ball of anyone on the pitch. He is apparently considered to be above Nketiah by his club, hence the apparent availability to us of latter. Overlook the big club 'brand' associated with players we are linked with, and look at what the player has actually achieved. Arsenal have slowly worked their way down into mid table for a reason. Their players aren't very good. Maitland-Niles, who was our best player at the Emirates last season, is so bad he can't even get into this mid table shower,yet he apparently comes with a £15m and upwards price tag. How? Why? Which test have any of these players passed to establish their value to us? Edited by TheBigToePunt (14 Aug 2021 10.41am) To be fair to him he's actually only had one loan, at Hoffenheim when he was about 19 and he had a pretty good time. I think arsenal could be more to blame for his development since - much like Gnabry. My view is I'd have him but only with a reasonable fee including option to buy. I think he's got the talent to suit us but wouldn't want to nurture him only for Arsenal to benefit. I feel the same about links with United's Diallo (though a purchase is way out of the question there). As we've got one loan in Gallagher (who I think will be a great addition) who will just be helping in the short term I'd hope the second loan might have a longer term view to it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
silvertop Portishead 14 Aug 21 7.07pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by samprior
To be fair to him he's actually only had one loan, at Hoffenheim when he was about 19 and he had a pretty good time. I think arsenal could be more to blame for his development since - much like Gnabry. My view is I'd have him but only with a reasonable fee including option to buy. I think he's got the talent to suit us but wouldn't want to nurture him only for Arsenal to benefit. I feel the same about links with United's Diallo (though a purchase is way out of the question there). As we've got one loan in Gallagher (who I think will be a great addition) who will just be helping in the short term I'd hope the second loan might have a longer term view to it. Why? If there is youth coming through why not a quality squad filler till he's fully seasoned? We are no longer a bargain basement Fulham who flood their Team with short term loans. That signals one season wonder. These days we have a resurgent academy that needs a bit more time to feed the first Team. Loans plug the gap. Options etc reduce the options and may effect cost.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
samprior Hamburg 14 Aug 21 8.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
Why? If there is youth coming through why not a quality squad filler till he's fully seasoned? We are no longer a bargain basement Fulham who flood their Team with short term loans. That signals one season wonder. These days we have a resurgent academy that needs a bit more time to feed the first Team. Loans plug the gap. Options etc reduce the options and may effect cost. I'd argue that we're short in wingers even if both Banks and Rak-Sakyi come good. Ayew cannot play there. So that leaves us just Zaha. 3 players for 2 places is not enough competition/ cover. Therefore if we're to sign a winger on loan I'd like us to have the option to buy them if they do well for us for the sake of future squad strength.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Qwijibo Bournemouth 15 Aug 21 1.27pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by samprior
I'd argue that we're short in wingers even if both Banks and Rak-Sakyi come good. Ayew cannot play there. So that leaves us just Zaha. 3 players for 2 places is not enough competition/ cover. Therefore if we're to sign a winger on loan I'd like us to have the option to buy them if they do well for us for the sake of future squad strength. And it's a huge ask to expect either one of them to step up, let alone both. Thing is, Nelson is barely any more proven than they are. I really buy into the youth development strategy, but it needs the balance of experience and wise heads. I feel if we are to make an affordable loan signing, ideally it should be someone who knows the league, who's proven to be capable winning a game or two. As to who that is, I don't know, but there must be a short term fix out there who is struggling to make a first eleven, e.g. Shaqiri or someone like that. I agree, I can only see the point in developing Nelson if we have an option to buy. Otherwise we're just improving a player for a local mid-table rival.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.