Dynamic midfielder

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Dynamic midfielder

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 2 of 2 << First < 1 2

Badger11 Beckenham 13 Jan 21 10.04am
This might be a better table 5yr net expenditure Brighton nearly £200m Palace £53m [Link] Edited by Badger11 (13 Jan 2021 10.15am) One more point
Alert a moderator to this post

Badger11

Beckenham 13 Jan 21 10.04am

This might be a better table 5yr net expenditure Brighton nearly £200m Palace £53m

[Link]

Edited by Badger11 (13 Jan 2021 10.15am)

One more point

Alert a moderator to this post

Mwncisee Middlesbrough 13 Jan 21 10.08am
Originally posted by Badger11 This might be a better table 5yr next expenditure Brighton nearly £200m Palace £53m [Link] How are we 990 thou in the green on that one, when we spent 16 odd mill on Eze this year and didn't sell anyone?
Alert a moderator to this post

Mwncisee

Middlesbrough 13 Jan 21 10.08am

Originally posted by Badger11

This might be a better table 5yr next expenditure Brighton nearly £200m Palace £53m

[Link]

How are we 990 thou in the green on that one, when we spent 16 odd mill on Eze this year and didn't sell anyone?

Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman Horsham 13 Jan 21 10.14am
Originally posted by Mwncisee How are we 990 thou in the green on that one, when we spent 16 odd mill on Eze this year and didn't sell anyone? Sorloth? and maybe Eze is in instalments, don’t know if that makes a difference Edited by Spiderman (13 Jan 2021 10.17am)
Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman

Horsham 13 Jan 21 10.14am

Originally posted by Mwncisee

How are we 990 thou in the green on that one, when we spent 16 odd mill on Eze this year and didn't sell anyone?

Sorloth? and maybe Eze is in instalments, don’t know if that makes a difference

Edited by Spiderman (13 Jan 2021 10.17am)

Alert a moderator to this post

Badger11 Beckenham 13 Jan 21 10.17am
Originally posted by Spiderman Sorloth? I think you should take these numbers with a pinch of salt because often clubs keep the deal amount secret. However in general terms I think it is fair to say that Brighton have spent a lot more money than us. One more point
Alert a moderator to this post

Badger11

Beckenham 13 Jan 21 10.17am

Originally posted by Spiderman

Sorloth?

I think you should take these numbers with a pinch of salt because often clubs keep the deal amount secret. However in general terms I think it is fair to say that Brighton have spent a lot more money than us.

One more point

Alert a moderator to this post

Mwncisee Middlesbrough 13 Jan 21 10.18am
Originally posted by Spiderman Sorloth? Duh in my part. Yep completely forgot about him......I'll slink back into a corner with my head bowed in shame.
Alert a moderator to this post

Mwncisee

Middlesbrough 13 Jan 21 10.18am

Originally posted by Spiderman

Sorloth?

Duh in my part. Yep completely forgot about him......I'll slink back into a corner with my head bowed in shame.

Alert a moderator to this post

Elwissthebest Marlborough 13 Jan 21 11.47am
A pity we signed Batshuayi on loan rather than Ross Barkley. He's the sort of dynamic midfield player we need. Or Loftus-Cheek again. Perhaps Frank Lampard might be persuaded to let one of these go, but it won't be until the summer.
Alert a moderator to this post

Elwissthebest

Marlborough 13 Jan 21 11.47am

A pity we signed Batshuayi on loan rather than Ross Barkley. He's the sort of dynamic midfield player we need. Or Loftus-Cheek again. Perhaps Frank Lampard might be persuaded to let one of these go, but it won't be until the summer.

Alert a moderator to this post

doombear Too far from Selhurst Park 13 Jan 21 11.58am
Originally posted by Elwissthebest A pity we signed Batshuayi on loan rather than Ross Barkley. He's the sort of dynamic midfield player we need. Or Loftus-Cheek again. Perhaps Frank Lampard might be persuaded to let one of these go, but it won't be until the summer. Conor Gallagher might be a better long term solution. Barkley is injury prone and L-C doesn't seem to be the player he was before his serious injury. I do wonder to what extent, psychologically, players who've had bad injuries hold back a bit in games for fear of another bad injury.
Alert a moderator to this post

doombear

Too far from Selhurst Park 13 Jan 21 11.58am

Originally posted by Elwissthebest

A pity we signed Batshuayi on loan rather than Ross Barkley. He's the sort of dynamic midfield player we need. Or Loftus-Cheek again. Perhaps Frank Lampard might be persuaded to let one of these go, but it won't be until the summer.

Conor Gallagher might be a better long term solution. Barkley is injury prone and L-C doesn't seem to be the player he was before his serious injury. I do wonder to what extent, psychologically, players who've had bad injuries hold back a bit in games for fear of another bad injury.

Alert a moderator to this post

samprior Hamburg 13 Jan 21 12.39pm
Originally posted by doombear Conor Gallagher might be a better long term solution. Barkley is injury prone and L-C doesn't seem to be the player he was before his serious injury. I do wonder to what extent, psychologically, players who've had bad injuries hold back a bit in games for fear of another bad injury. We were close to getting Gallagher until we found out Bats was also available. This was seen as the better option at the time but now appears like the wrong one. Just glad there's no obligation to buy Batshuayi... that would have been real bad business.
Alert a moderator to this post

samprior

Hamburg 13 Jan 21 12.39pm

Originally posted by doombear

We were close to getting Gallagher until we found out Bats was also available. This was seen as the better option at the time but now appears like the wrong one. Just glad there's no obligation to buy Batshuayi... that would have been real bad business.

Alert a moderator to this post

Badger11 Beckenham 13 Jan 21 12.44pm
Originally posted by samprior We were close to getting Gallagher until we found out Bats was also available. This was seen as the better option at the time but now appears like the wrong one. Just glad there's no obligation to buy Batshuayi... that would have been real bad business. If we send Bats back at the end of the season don't expect Chelsea to do us any favours in the future. They are hoping they have got rid and as Bats hasn't been given an extended run in the team may think we have not handled him well. One more point
Alert a moderator to this post

Badger11

Beckenham 13 Jan 21 12.44pm

Originally posted by samprior

If we send Bats back at the end of the season don't expect Chelsea to do us any favours in the future. They are hoping they have got rid and as Bats hasn't been given an extended run in the team may think we have not handled him well.

One more point

Alert a moderator to this post

Petereagle Brockley 13 Jan 21 1.58pm
Originally posted by samprior We were close to getting Gallagher until we found out Bats was also available. This was seen as the better option at the time but now appears like the wrong one. Just glad there's no obligation to buy Batshuayi... that would have been real bad business. WBA look odds on for relegation, so Gallagher will be back at Chelsea. A loan to buy might be an option?
Alert a moderator to this post

Petereagle

Brockley 13 Jan 21 1.58pm

Originally posted by samprior

WBA look odds on for relegation, so Gallagher will be back at Chelsea. A loan to buy might be an option?

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 2 of 2 << First < 1 2

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Dynamic midfielder

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors