You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > New Attorney General "Suella" Braverman
November 22 2024 1.05am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

New Attorney General "Suella" Braverman

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 2 of 11 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

  

PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 14 Feb 20 1.44pm Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

the story in the link below, you can call it 'cultural Marxism' or idiocy or 'the rot'

but it is clear that Boris wishes to be seen trying to stop the rot.

[Link]

 


Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
mezzer Flag Main Stand, Block F, Row 20 seat 1... 14 Feb 20 2.11pm Send a Private Message to mezzer Add mezzer as a friend

It was always going to take a Braverman than Cox to be AG

 


Living down here does have some advantages. At least you can see them cry.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Matov Flag 14 Feb 20 2.21pm Send a Private Message to Matov Add Matov as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

One for the common man but don't celebrate too soon the Supreme Court will have the final say.

Harry Miller: Police probe into 'transphobic' tweets unlawful

[Link]

Been following that case for a while now. Pleased he won because he has put a lot on the line for this.

The most sinister part was this...

He was told he had not committed a crime, but it would be recorded as a non-crime "hate incident".

I believe the actual box that this was ticked against was called 'Crime-Non Crime.' And in the original call from the Police to him he was told to 'check his thinking'.

A couple of interesting interviews about this out there but the implications were frightening including this 'non-crime' being disclosed in any future vetting checks for a variety of professions.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
W12 14 Feb 20 2.47pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Well, Cummings is coming for the Supreme Court as well.

Those who want to keep their jobs will do well to reflect upon the history of free speech that this country enjoys and reject the New Labour and May free speech restrictions.

I suspect that Johnson will be consigning them to the dustbin where they belong.

Don't you just love an 80 seat majority.

Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Feb 2020 1.26pm)


Boris (and Cummings) should be going all out to revoke all of the terrible laws introduced by Blair while he has the power to do so. That would mean the Supreme Court would no longer even exist.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 14 Feb 20 5.49pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

It's quite something when opponents of the EU start suggesting it is authoritarian!

The EU has been resisting growing authoritarianism in several EU states and no doubt would be doing so here, if we were still members.

To accuse the EU of being authoritarian is to totally misunderstand the way it operates. Any authority it has has been delegated to it by the agreement of the members, who remain in control.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 14 Feb 20 5.58pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by W12


Boris (and Cummings) should be going all out to revoke all of the terrible laws introduced by Blair while he has the power to do so. That would mean the Supreme Court would no longer even exist.

What do you suggest?

That we return the Court of final appeal to the Law Laws as it was before the Supreme Court was created?

The reason it was established was to create some distance between the place where the laws were enacted and those who had to apply them.

To go back would be a retrograde step. I hear that some in government want their select committee to "interview" all prospective new appointees to the Court. This would be a disastrous move as it potentially brings us closer to politicising the judiciary. The last thing we should aim for is a situation similar to the USA where legal judgements often depend more on politics than on an objective analysis of the law.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 14 Feb 20 5.59pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

I've no idea what kind of LSD they are smoking in Cornwall nowadays but it's far stronger than normal.

It's like the UK, Greece, Spain, the lost referendums in multiple countries and unrest in the EU just passes this guy by as though it's a dream.

The EU commission isn't elected democratically and it a cabal of technocrats forced onto the continent...... and governments don't give their peoples the chance to leave.....and when a constitution forces a vote and they vote to leave they tell them to vote again.

Only the UK ignored people like him and finally....after a second election and a year late....broke away from this authoritarian centralised Corporatocracy.


Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Feb 2020 6.01pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 14 Feb 20 6.00pm Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

Originally posted by W12


Boris (and Cummings) should be going all out to revoke all of the terrible laws introduced by Blair while he has the power to do so. That would mean the Supreme Court would no longer even exist.

and as for Cherie Blair protesting 'boo hoo we must respect the human rights of the poor murderers and rapists'

may her name live forever in ignominy

 


Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 14 Feb 20 6.59pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

I have never taken any kind of drug in my life but I am wondering if a dense fog of nonsense has settled over the Fens which is making the truth hard to see.

Of course the EU Commission isn't voted in democratically. That anyone thinks that it ought to be just demonstrates how far removed they are from reality and how poorly they understand the way the EU functions.

It's this type of deliberate misrepresentation which has resulted in us getting into this mess. Such people will not either be forgotten or forgiven.

The Commission are effectively civil servants. They aren't forced on anybody. They are appointed and controlled by the member states. It doesn't make laws. It makes proposals which are then passed by the member states and the EU parliament, which is elected.

That national governments hold referendums, and then decide how to respond to them, is entirely their own responsibility. The Commission are not involved.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
cryrst Flag The garden of England 14 Feb 20 7.27pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I have never taken any kind of drug in my life but I am wondering if a dense fog of nonsense has settled over the Fens which is making the truth hard to see.

Of course the EU Commission isn't voted in democratically. That anyone thinks that it ought to be just demonstrates how far removed they are from reality and how poorly they understand the way the EU functions.

It's this type of deliberate misrepresentation which has resulted in us getting into this mess. Such people will not either be forgotten or forgiven.

The Commission are effectively civil servants. They aren't forced on anybody. They are appointed and controlled by the member states. It doesn't make laws. It makes proposals which are then passed by the member states and the EU parliament, which is elected.

That national governments hold referendums, and then decide how to respond to them, is entirely their own responsibility. The Commission are not involved.

What 'mess' is this you speak of?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
DanH Flag SW2 15 Feb 20 7.43am Send a Private Message to DanH Add DanH as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I have never taken any kind of drug in my life but I am wondering if a dense fog of nonsense has settled over the Fens which is making the truth hard to see.

Of course the EU Commission isn't voted in democratically. That anyone thinks that it ought to be just demonstrates how far removed they are from reality and how poorly they understand the way the EU functions.

It's this type of deliberate misrepresentation which has resulted in us getting into this mess. Such people will not either be forgotten or forgiven.

The Commission are effectively civil servants. They aren't forced on anybody. They are appointed and controlled by the member states. It doesn't make laws. It makes proposals which are then passed by the member states and the EU parliament, which is elected.

That national governments hold referendums, and then decide how to respond to them, is entirely their own responsibility. The Commission are not involved.

Stop stating the facts when you can talk in half truths and gossip. Even better; just regurgitate stuff off of Vloggers on YouTube or Infowars or Breitbart and present it confidently as fact.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 15 Feb 20 10.26am Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

Originally posted by DanH

Stop stating the facts when you can talk in half truths and gossip. Even better; just regurgitate stuff off of Vloggers on YouTube or Infowars or Breitbart and present it confidently as fact.

Can i present this confidently as fact ?

The British people emphatically rejected your mate Jeremy corbyn. And the other people living in the country...those who voted for him , well they got reminded just who won the brexit vote.

So stop being such a sore loser and take your medicine. London voted remain cos London lost all its Londoners.

Edited by PalazioVecchio (15 Feb 2020 10.27am)

 


Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 2 of 11 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > New Attorney General "Suella" Braverman