[Link]

It seems to be the FA’s interpretation of offside rather than the official line. As you say, confusion reigns.

Head and feet are primary scoring parts.
Not many bum or chest goals in.
These two offside would be sufficient.

Correct.

If the head and/or feet [foot] is over the line. The end. Simples.

Arm pit, torso, knee, elbow... complete nonsense foot and/or head. Choose one and stick with it. If it is not clear then its a goal.

It need not be so complicated. I agree with VAR because some if not most of our referees and linesman are; A) Incompetent; and/or B) biased (Martin Atkinson et al); and/or C) make genuine errors. VAR should and can eliminate these issues. The principle is a great idea as it makes it 'fair'. It is the incompetent and arrogant application that is poor.

I don't think that IFAB will change the offside law.
It is more likely that VAR will resort to "Clear and obvious" rather than a forensic examination determining whether a player is offside by the length of a toe using technology that is being questioned for it's degree of accuracy.

To be fair, VAR got it right last night. It’s the ridiculous new hand ball rule which was the issue. ‘Clear and obvious’ has to be introduced.

I’m just completely sick of it. People now celebrate VAR decisions in their favour and can’t actually properly celebrate goals being scored. All we read about is VAR rather than match analysis.

I’d rather it was just scraped completely as it’s taking a lot enjoyment out of football. Referee injustice is part of the game and can effect the stadium atmosphere in a good way. I’ve always believed the bad decisions will even themselves out over a season.

Great to see the protest banner from the HF today. Hopefully other fans will see and produce similar.

It worked in our favour today, but that doesn’t cover up the continued farce. 2 mins 33 seconds to make the decision apparently.