Good call. There are numerous solutions.

Also efficient energy storage has long been a head scratcher but rail systems and the like offer surprisingly effective and innovative solutions.

[Link]

Element 115.

As I'm sure you are aware. Bob Lazar talked about it years before it was synthesised.

Funny how the Americans and Russians went to all that trouble.

It's wise to question the credibility but he knew about that and night tests of weird and wonderful aircraft and where they happened before anyone had heard of this stuff.

Keep an open mind.

Thank you.

On another thread I posted about an alternate nuclear energy but couldn't remember it's name.

The Americans had a design back in the 1950's but didn't go ahead because it didn't create plutonium. Apparently the Chinese are working on it now and expect to build one in the next 10 years. In theory it's far safer than the current ones and would mean that countries like North Korea and Iran could build them as they are only for energy creation.

As for green energy it all depends on storage if the battery technology improves then it becomes sustainable.

One more point

The current energy is no different storage wise. It is all electricity that is produced and then needs to be stored and directed to where it is needed. There is no difference between the storage of electricity generated from a coal-fired power station than there is from electricity produced by wind farms. Both are just electricity.
Where I live we have regular flooding and a really deep fast flowing river that is not navigable. Therefore if we used water wheels/ turbines to generate electricity we could have loads for free. Would easily power our small town and wouldn't even cost much to do.
Whenever I bring it up though, I hear about the energy storage. If you think about it, that is obviously a red herring. My understanding is that it is little to do with batteries and more to do with capacitors that we currently use. We lose quite a bit of electricity already due to poor infrastructure - there is literally no difference if we generated the electricity differently originally.
Sooner or later we will have to have major upgrades. I'm happy enough with safe nuclear power but I don't think that extends to a lot of people in Britain and Ireland. Our countries are islands surrounded by rough seas that constantly move. Not much of a stretch to think that we already have the technology to harness this. There are clearly vested interests.

Red and Blue Army!

The continued ignoring of relatively safe and clean nuclear power is a scandal. What that's left us is western powers pandering to authoritarian Islamism regimes including providing them arms to suppress their own people and others.