This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
.TUX. 19 Oct 18 9.23pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
I am hoping to see this next week it has a limited viewing and already some of the showings are sold out. Such a shame that the cinema chains don't get it. If you can't make it the BBC will be showing this on Remembrance Sunday. I agree with another poster this should be shown in all schools and colleges. Whilst our students are busy doing the important stuff e.g. how to spell the word Woman without including the word "man" or tearing down statues because their white and male, their counterparts were giving their lives for this great country of ours. A J P Taylor's Origins Of The First World War is considered to the definitive book. Having read it and studied WW1 I must confess I still don't understand why it happened. I think Blackadder had it right when silly George asked him the question. "It was just too difficult to stop." I also agree with some historians who maintain that there was only 1 war with a 20 year gap in the middle. There is some logic to this as the origins of WW2 lie in the outcome of WW1.
As always, money/greed. RIP to the innocent masses.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 19 Oct 18 9.29pm | |
---|---|
Well thats all of our existance really.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 19 Oct 18 9.38pm | |
---|---|
I think it just seems outwardly ridiculous that someone could go the wrong way down a one-way street in Sarajevo and cause a world war. And in 1913 Europe was in many ways an enlightened place 'la belle etoile' etc. But I think the reality had been brewing for many years, Germany and the Kaiser in particular, were spoiling for war.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chateauferret 19 Oct 18 9.47pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
I was always taught it was because, seeing conflict coming, the Germans' only plan was the Schlieffen plan. I am no historian but I am German scholar (or I was once). The Germanic peoples longed to be a nation, an empire, more or less ever since they were a loose collection of petty fiefdoms and city states under the loose and fragile federation that was the Holy Roman Empire and that desire was never really realised even in the 1848 union. It aspired to a nation which extended, in the words of its then anthem, "von dem Maas bis an die Memel / von dem Ettrich bis zum Belt" (from the Mosel to Kaliningrad and from the Adige [in northern Italy] to the Baltic), but still didn't achieve that. Always there were people perceived as "German" who were outwith anything officially calked "Germany": places like Alsace and Lorraine, Poland, the Sudetenland, the South Tirol. Germany itself still had lots of internal divisions and politics going on and was only unified in a sense. The 1919 Versailles settlement of course had the effect of galvanising support for a response not only to its punitive terms but also to its curtailment of Germany's nationalistic ambitions whose focus was the National Socialist movement. But that was a continuation not only of what the nation was trying to do in 1914 but actually goes a long way back into the Middle Ages. Of course in 1945 the nation was again broken up and bits of it were cut off. The bits that were France, Poland and Czechoslovakia were returned to those countries. Austria was again made independent. German-speaking peoples remained the wrong side of the Brenner Pass. The funny thing is that even post-Unification Germanic peoples remain outside the Bund, but in an economic sense the EU is more or less run, de facto if not de jure, from the very city that Kaiser Willhelm and Adolf Hitler tried, and failed, to make into the greatest capitol since Rome. Whom is it that the mickey mouse nations go cap in hand to when they run out of money? It isn't the Prime Minister. There is a strong national character around organisation, efficiency and overbearing behaviour that seems to stem from all this. Next time the German occupies your sun lounger in Lanzarote and says "Ve vere here firrst", this history perhaps explains some of his attitude - and the speed at which he will deflate if you answer him in German. Edited by chateauferret (19 Oct 2018 9.54pm)
============ |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 19 Oct 18 9.56pm | |
---|---|
There isn't one reason WW1 happened of course, that's something we all probably would agree on. We know that we can summarise the main factors as the same old same old political and economic ambitions and old and new territorial ambitions. Europe's competing nations had used advances in technology to build up its militaries and the power vacuum left by the decline of the Ottoman Empire had left the possibility that a leader nation could emerge. Then again at a basic level we can see warfare as a basic inevitability. WW1 happened because warfare is a natural state of being for human beings throughout history. Human beings are tribal and Europe had the Balkan tension point existing as a possible flash point. This meant that you had, in effect, two series of competing military alliances....Germany with Austria-Hungary and Russia with France and us. Both alliances were involved in Serbia, which caused tensions with Russia due to the close connections between Russians and Serbs....So when a Serb murdered the Austrian Archduke Ferdinand and his wife threats and counter threats were issued and alliances activated and the whole grisly tea party started. WW1 is what it is because technology had developed to such an extent that it could be carried out far more effectively and hence the causalities were that much higher.....in fact far far higher. At its most simple level and to repeat WW1 happened because conflict is natural and technology and militaries give the elites the opportunity to carry out sophisticated squabbles to mass causalities when if it had happened thousands of years ago the deaths would be purely localised.
Attachment: ww1.JPG (28.05Kb)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 19 Oct 18 10.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by chateauferret
I am no historian but I am German scholar (or I was once). The Germanic peoples longed to be a nation, an empire, more or less ever since they were a loose collection of petty fiefdoms and city states under the loose and fragile federation that was the Holy Roman Empire and that desire was never really realised even in the 1848 union. It aspired to a nation which extended, in the words of its then anthem, "von dem Maas bis an die Memel / von dem Ettrich bis zum Belt" (from the Mosel to Kaliningrad and from the Adige [in northern Italy] to the Baltic), but still didn't achieve that. Always there were people perceived as "German" who were outwith anything officially calked "Germany": places like Alsace and Lorraine, Poland, the Sudetenland, the South Tirol. Germany itself still had lots of internal divisions and politics going on and was only unified in a sense. The 1919 Versailles settlement of course had the effect of galvanising support for a response not only to its punitive terms but also to its curtailment of Germany's nationalistic ambitions whose focus was the National Socialist movement. But that was a continuation not only of what the nation was trying to do in 1914 but actually goes a long way back into the Middle Ages. Of course in 1945 the nation was again broken up and bits of it were cut off. The bits that were France, Poland and Czechoslovakia were returned to those countries. Austria was again made independent. German-speaking peoples remained the wrong side of the Brenner Pass. The funny thing is that even post-Unification Germanic peoples remain outside the Bund, but in an economic sense the EU is more or less run, de facto if not de jure, from the very city that Kaiser Willhelm and Adolf Hitler tried, and failed, to make into the greatest capitol since Rome. Whom is it that the mickey mouse nations go cap in hand to when they run out of money? It isn't the Prime Minister. Edited by chateauferret (19 Oct 2018 9.47pm) Chateauferret I just finished reading "The Short History of Germany" by James Hawes it's in the bestseller list. An interesting and easy read he confirms a lot of what you said. He is not very complimentary about Prussia / East Germany and puts a lot of Germany's issues at their doorstep. Nazism was the culmination of many generations of Prussian outsider hatred. Hitler it turned our was not very original in his thinking but he did what the Prussian had failed to do (dominate Germany) which is why they backed him. Also for those he were involved in the Left are the same as the Nazis discussion the author goes into that. It seems that the extremist Prussian right wing had a lot in common with the Russian Communists. Anyway I good read I picked it up in TheWorks for £3. I forgot to add that guess where the current far right parties are the strongest? Yup Old Prussia seems like they are still singing the same song. Edited by Badger11 (19 Oct 2018 10.15pm) Edited by Badger11 (19 Oct 2018 10.17pm)
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chateauferret 19 Oct 18 10.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
Chateauferret I just finished reading "The Short History of Germany" by James Hawes it's in the bestseller list. An interesting and easy read he confirms a lot of what you said. He is not very complimentary about Prussia / East Germany and puts a lot of Germany's issues at their doorstep. Nazism was the culmination of many generations of Prussian outsider hatred. Hitler it turned our was not very original in his thinking but he did what the Prussian had failed to do (dominate Germany) which is why they backed him. Also for those he were involved in the Left are the same as the Nazis discussion the author goes into that. It seems that the extremist Prussian right wing had a lot in common with the Russian Communists. Anyway I good read I picked it up in TheWorks for £3. I'll have a look for the book, I confess to not knowing much of the detail of all this but understanding the macropolitical forces operating in central Europe across maybe 1,000 years is key to understanding much of the art, culture and character of Germany. Outsider hatred was also a big part of it, Nazi propaganda was at pains to point out that Jews had been buggering up Germans' aims and interests for centuries and using it as the rationalisation of anti-Semitism. That each and every Jew was somehow personally responsible for the failure of native economies to compete with immigrant ones 500 years ago was quite a leap of logic. But it does show that the Nazis' persuit of European Jews was as deep-rooted as it was wrong.
============ |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PalazioVecchio south pole 20 Oct 18 2.29pm | |
---|---|
looking at 2 world wars, the notion of the Germans being 'the baddies' and the allies being the goodies is very simplistic. there were evil, genocidal, Imperial monsters on all sides.
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Modcyril Cherry Hill, New Jersey 20 Oct 18 3.37pm | |
---|---|
I don’t often post here but this one interested me. I have a couple of quick points. We are absolutely correct to mention atrocities committed during the war and the actions of Belgium and Getmany as colonial powers. We should also mention these in the context of how all countries abused their power in Asia, Africa and Latin America. The French, Dutch, Spanish and British also acted brutally within their colonies. I’m pretty certain that no Eurpean Power had clean hands when it came to subjucation of indigenous peoples, exploitation of resources and the imposition of culture that was entirely alien. I guess we could argue the degree to which each European nation mistreated their “possessions? Regarding the whole poppy debate. I agree that we should honour and respect the vast majority of veterans and war dead. The Poppy is just one symbolic and financial way of doing so. I’ve contributed and worn them in the past. I just wish that there was a way to donate that didn’t route via the RBLA: I feel that yes, they honor the veterans and fallen soldiers and provide needed services and continue to remind us of past sacrifices. I just wish that they weren’t perpetuating the King and Country piece of it all. I understand that that is important to some, but it does somewhat gloss over individual stories etc. that’s my opinion,
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 20 Oct 18 4.47pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by PalazioVecchio
looking at 2 world wars, the notion of the Germans being 'the baddies' and the allies being the goodies is very simplistic. there were evil, genocidal, Imperial monsters on all sides. While this has truth to it...the reality of these things is more....who is the bigger monster.....However, it can't be ignored that in WW2 the Axis contained the far far larger monster..... Only Germany had a plan of genocide for an actual group and slavery for others. They also executed civilians deliberately when they encountered resistance in their occupied countries.....Only Germany murdered ten million Russians, women and children and raping at will as they went......they had good reason to fear the Russians once they had the upper hand....in retaliation or perhaps just because....the Russians raped they way through Germany onto Berlin and one million babies were registered with mostly unknown Russian fathers...and lets not forget that these were the women who were allowed to live or decided not to kill themselves. None of those charges can be leveled at GB.....the worst we did in WW2 was the carpet bombing of German cities....something we never truly celebrated and which was done in response to German carpet bombing of ours. 'You kill our children, we will yours'.....the race to the bottom that is the one guarantee of total war. However, the use of atomic bombs by Truman against Japan to achieve unconditional surrender......that still remains the hardest pill for me to swallow. I just don't want to think about whether I could have done it or not....whether it should have been done or not. Edited by Stirlingsays (20 Oct 2018 4.54pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chateauferret 20 Oct 18 6.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
While this has truth to it...the reality of these things is more....who is the bigger monster.....However, it can't be ignored that in WW2 the Axis contained the far far larger monster..... Only Germany had a plan of genocide for an actual group and slavery for others. They also executed civilians deliberately when they encountered resistance in their occupied countries.....Only Germany murdered ten million Russians, women and children and raping at will as they went......they had good reason to fear the Russians once they had the upper hand....in retaliation or perhaps just because....the Russians raped they way through Germany onto Berlin and one million babies were registered with mostly unknown Russian fathers...and lets not forget that these were the women who were allowed to live or decided not to kill themselves. None of those charges can be leveled at GB.....the worst we did in WW2 was the carpet bombing of German cities....something we never truly celebrated and which was done in response to German carpet bombing of ours. 'You kill our children, we will yours'.....the race to the bottom that is the one guarantee of total war. However, the use of atomic bombs by Truman against Japan to achieve unconditional surrender......that still remains the hardest pill for me to swallow. I just don't want to think about whether I could have done it or not....whether it should have been done or not. Edited by Stirlingsays (20 Oct 2018 4.54pm) The real enemy at this point was Stalin. Truman used atomic weapons against Japan in order to keep the Soviet Union from "helping" the USA invade Japan and from then being assigned a portion of it in the same way that it was in Germany, being allowed to turn Hokkaido (say) into a puppet communist state like the "GDR". After the battle of Iwo Jima Japan waz defeated and the outcome was only a matter of time, but the treaty between the USA and he USSR said that the latter would come steaming in if the Yanks hadn't cleaned up by mid-August 1945.
Edited by chateauferret (20 Oct 2018 6.48pm)
============ |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 20 Oct 18 7.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by chateauferret
The real enemy at this point was Stalin. Truman used atomic weapons against Japan in order to keep the Soviet Union from "helping" the USA invade Japan and from then being assigned a portion of it in the same way that it was in Germany, being allowed to turn Hokkaido (say) into a puppet communist state like the "GDR". After the battle of Iwo Jima Japan waz defeated and the outcome was only a matter of time, but the treaty between the USA and he USSR said that the latter would come steaming in if the Yanks hadn't cleaned up by mid-August 1945.
Edited by chateauferret (20 Oct 2018 6.48pm) It's a good point to make that we actually had our own monster.....one that happily shook hands after the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact. The differences between Hitler and Stalin are purely cosmetic.......as meaningless as Trump saying that using chemical weapons to murder people is unacceptable which implies that dying via barrel bombs are ok....as if there is a level of dying horribly that just tips a level of acceptability....When we know that the real reasons for the chemical weapons objection is national self interest. Churchill's plan to attack the Soviets directly after WW2 made sense....but war exhaustion made it a non starter.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.