You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Ref v Fulham
November 24 2024 7.34am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Ref v Fulham

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >

  

PA Flag Bedfordshire 12 Aug 18 1.53pm Send a Private Message to PA Add PA as a friend

We definitely dodged one there. Most refs would have given it as a penalty.

The Tomkins / Sakho partnership remains undefeated!!

Edited by PA (12 Aug 2018 1.54pm)

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 12 Aug 18 2.32pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Such a fast moving incident with the ball arriving at pace and two players converging.The referee with the naked-eye cannot know for definite if contact was made with the ball or the man, accordingly Mike Dean gesticulated that NO penalty was to be awarded.

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
JRW2 Flag Dulwich 12 Aug 18 3.16pm Send a Private Message to JRW2 Add JRW2 as a friend

Originally posted by Willo

Such a fast moving incident with the ball arriving at pace and two players converging.The referee with the naked-eye cannot know for definite if contact was made with the ball or the man, accordingly Mike Dean gesticulated that NO penalty was to be awarded.

Out of interest, now that you (I presume) have seen the incident several times in slow motion, do you think it was a penalty? Or do you think it's still impossible to tell?

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 12 Aug 18 3.30pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Originally posted by JRW2

Out of interest, now that you (I presume) have seen the incident several times in slow motion, do you think it was a penalty? Or do you think it's still impossible to tell?

For avoidance of doubt I haven't seen the incident several times - I just saw the coverage on 'Goals on Sunday'.

The point is that the referee didn't have the luxury of reviewing the incident several times in slow motion and he is the one that makes the decision.It is very difficult with the naked-eye to determine whether contact was made with the ball or man - either Mike Dean was convinced contact was made with the ball or he wasn't sure hence couldn't award the penalty.I suspect the latter.

Edited by Willo (12 Aug 2018 3.51pm)

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
becky Flag over the moon 12 Aug 18 3.55pm Send a Private Message to becky Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add becky as a friend

Originally posted by JRW2

Out of interest, now that you (I presume) have seen the incident several times in slow motion, do you think it was a penalty? Or do you think it's still impossible to tell?

I was watching on TSN and their 3 bods in the studio showed the incident several times from each of the 3 camera angles and reckoned that you still couldn't see clearly enough to make a positive decision. Mike Dean was in a good position to see better than the cameras.

 

A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers
Alert Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Bullhorn76 Flag Darlington 12 Aug 18 5.01pm Send a Private Message to Bullhorn76 Add Bullhorn76 as a friend

The was it wasn’t it penalty incident reminded me of West Ham v palace with Hernandez going over Tomkins trailing leg last season and of course that one was given

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Spiderman Flag Horsham 12 Aug 18 5.02pm Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Originally posted by europalace

Mike Dean got the decision spot on. No replay from any angle shows clearly whether a foot touched the ball first or not. In this case Dean was close and called it based on his clear view of the tackle. Excellent refereeing.

Edited by europalace (12 Aug 2018 12.40pm)

Totally agree. Also Schurrle didn't appeal. Only thing he may have got wrong was not booking Chambers for blatant body check on Wilf.

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Elpis Flag In a pub 12 Aug 18 5.52pm Send a Private Message to Elpis Add Elpis as a friend

Originally posted by becky

I was watching on TSN and their 3 bods in the studio showed the incident several times from each of the 3 camera angles and reckoned that you still couldn't see clearly enough to make a positive decision. Mike Dean was in a good position to see better than the cameras.

I have watched this from all the angles presented and not one shows contact . Close but not clear enough to say penalty . The fact that the Fulham player was going nowhere anyway and was already on his way to ground makes me agree with you that Mike Dean was the only one who could call this and one of those where the referee is always right .
Was impressed with his general running of the game , didn't stop the game unless he had to and in all contributed to a very watchable match

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
It's only a game Flag Praa Sands 12 Aug 18 6.32pm Send a Private Message to It's only a game Add It's only a game as a friend

Originally posted by Elpis

I have watched this from all the angles presented and not one shows contact . Close but not clear enough to say penalty . The fact that the Fulham player was going nowhere anyway and was already on his way to ground makes me agree with you that Mike Dean was the only one who could call this and one of those where the referee is always right .
Was impressed with his general running of the game , didn't stop the game unless he had to and in all contributed to a very watchable match

Good post and Mike Dean was closer than any camera.

 

A stockbroker urged me to buy a stock that would triple its value every year. I told him, at my age, I don't even buy green bananas!
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Direwolf Flag Lincoln 12 Aug 18 6.43pm Send a Private Message to Direwolf Add Direwolf as a friend

Originally posted by It's only a game

Good post and Mike Dean was closer than any camera.

I suspect that the camera's have a rather closer view but he made the decision on what he could see and believed to be the case.

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
collier row eagle Flag romford essex via another galaxy 12 Aug 18 6.54pm Send a Private Message to collier row eagle Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add collier row eagle as a friend

Originally posted by mansekotka

Don't want to jinx Dean for us but I have felt for a while that he is a secret Palace fan. When Dean has been refereeing, a few favourable decisions have come our way and yesterday was a good example. Did anyone notice how he almost 'celebrated' Zaha's goal?

Edited by mansekotka (12 Aug 2018 12.41pm)

Yes he did a double backward flip ad punched tha air twice!!!!

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
spartakev2 Flag Anerley 12 Aug 18 7.22pm Send a Private Message to spartakev2 Add spartakev2 as a friend

Originally posted by becky

I was watching on TSN and their 3 bods in the studio showed the incident several times from each of the 3 camera angles and reckoned that you still couldn't see clearly enough to make a positive decision. Mike Dean was in a good position to see better than the cameras.

I was watching tsn too. No way coukd you say there was definately cintact. Shearer tried very hard to show it on Motd by blowing the image up massively and it still wasn't conclusive. So don't know how dean could have given it.

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Ref v Fulham