I’m sorry but 20mil for Danny Ings is complete insanity. And I actually wouldn’t of been that opposed to taking a punt on him at the right price.

If this does go ahead, I’ll certainly be a paid up member of the Freedman out brigade.

We're the Arthur over ere!

Any more than £6 million and we are having our pants pulled down. Even that outlay would need to be structured on appearances etc.

How much we would expect for Connor Wickham?

You can't rely that either will be capable of playing a few games before they spend the rest of the season injured.

Once a great prospect, but when he's hardly played for 2-3 seasons, we would be mad to spend silly money.

The problem is twofold, Liverpool need to recoup funds for the overinflated purchases they are making and Parrish has a fixation with Liverpool players.

We've paid over the odds for CB and MS why be surprised with this. I'm not.

Yep, i agree, just coz the Telegraph says so doesn't make it true or accurate, also says the 20m would rise to 25m with add-ons, and that R.H. is looking to sell players to fund this, the only one i can think of is Townsend. just can't see this happening.

if true would never pay 20 million for a player that hasn't played for 18 months if INGS is worth 20 million than Wickham is worth 25million of anyone's money😂😂😂😂

Honestly I’m praying this is nonsense. It sounds like it, if we have been tight fisted all window, why would we spend 20 million on a bang average injury prone player?

I’d take him for about 5 million, any more and I’d be suspecting Liverpool have somehow got hold of a compromising video of Parish, I’m already half convinced they have after how much we have paid them in recent years.