Kilbane isn’t used much now by the media so he tries to be controversial just to get attention - just like Chris Sutton .
Kilbane just showed his complete ignorance tonight with the rubbish comments about Wilf. Mind you what did he ever do as a player to warrant this job?
I listened to the game on 5 Live and Terry Butcher said it was a stonewall pen plus he kept saying how Watford were targeting Wilf with fouls plus trying to wind him up ! - and that’s from a bloke who has done everything at the top level

I agree with almost every comment made; that was a disgracefully biased piece of nonsense from the BBC last night. Our problem is that, with Wilf, we've reached the 'AJ in 2005 syndrome' where he'll never be given the benefit of the doubt because the court of public opinion has spoken.

Bexley Dave

Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing!

"The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)

I agree.
If he stopped the silly stuff then that was a pen.
I also thought he left his foot in against the keeper when he didn't need to.
I love him to bits but sometimes........

Sadly you are probably right.

Bexley Dave

Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing!

"The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)

Loved the idea that it was Wilf's "petulance" to place a hand on Decoure when he had run about 40 yards to be involved in the incident. This was "inadvertently" missed by Kilbane.

“ [T]here are known knowns; there are things we know that we know.There are known unknowns; that is to say there are things that, we now know we don't know.But there are also unknown unknowns – there are things we do not know we don't know. ”
—United States Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld

Thought his comments were a bit off. Didn’t quite understand his take on the foul outside the box and falling into the area. The fall looked natural to me and I don’t think he even appealed for a penalty.

The challenge on the keeper was a ball he had to go for, no malice. You’d expect your strikers to go in to try and win that. To call it nasty was over the top.

I didn’t watch the game but the highlights would suggest Wilf was a constant threat. He deserved praise for his performance, not Kilbane sticking his boot in. Had the penalty been correctly awarded he would of probably been hailed for a match winning performance.

The reality is that no one outside Palace likes Zaha and that’s a testement to how good he is. He just needs to accept the hits and not rise to it, he’s an easy target for opposition as he’s so petulant. It’s this behaviour that puts refs and pundits off. He reminds me of a young Christiano Ronaldo