You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Ref v weed
November 24 2024 10.35am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Ref v weed

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 2 of 2 << First< 1 2

  

The Dolphin Flag 14 Apr 18 9.54pm Send a Private Message to The Dolphin Add The Dolphin as a friend

Originally posted by timmyb

From my lofty corner of the Arthur, I thought the ref was excellent. Luca and the Brighton no 5 could both have gone, but the concept of keeping all 22 on the field in a feisty derby clearly hasn't been consigned to history. It never got out of hand today, so I'd credit him with keeping control.

We won...why whinge?

I sort of agree. Very difficult to not send people off today mainly by way of two yellows and other than a couple of strange decisions he did pretty well.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
thai-eagle Flag chiang mai 15 Apr 18 2.54am Send a Private Message to thai-eagle Add thai-eagle as a friend

It's fair that refs like to keep all 22 players on the pitch. And that football is still a contact sport, BUT...how come Marriner not take action against Stephens (after early booking) and Dunk that repeatedly committed yellow card sins? Maybe felt sorry for the weeds due to the amazing atmosphere? Watched game on Thai TV. Thailand is a funny country, but their coverage by True Vision of Premier League is top top. All games live with English commentators). Still buzzing, but the game certainly lived up to Brian Clough's book "Game of two halves".

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
dreamwaverider Flag London 15 Apr 18 6.35am Send a Private Message to dreamwaverider Add dreamwaverider as a friend

HE should’ve been sent off. But we got what we wanted.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
peterg Flag Anerley 15 Apr 18 8.23am Send a Private Message to peterg Add peterg as a friend

Originally posted by Spiderman

To be fair Luka could have gone in 1st half. Booked for throwing ball away then a cynical trip in their half (probably what saved him)

Luka thought he was in trouble after the trip because he had his head in his hands. Ref decided to be generous and not send him off. I think that was why he didn't send anyone else off either.

 


The right place at the right time

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
pstrutt Flag Busselton, WA 15 Apr 18 9.10am Send a Private Message to pstrutt Add pstrutt as a friend

I think refs have to balance the game. Marriner gave Luka another chance which is why Stephens got a second chance also.

Every official missed Dunk’s cynical challenge on AT. That looked quite nasty. Got the ball, but completely took out the man.

 


So I manage a Workshop which provides a safe learning environment for blokes struggling with PTSD and other mental health issues. Being a Palace fan isn't listed yet.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 2 of 2 << First< 1 2

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Ref v weed