This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 08 Mar 18 8.35am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DutchEagleJohan
This comment proves why no-one should take your comments on refeeering seriously. A "proffesional foul" to break a counter attack by definition should be booking. With respect I was NOT referring to so called "Professional fouls". Of course blatant fouls which prevent a breakaway are yellow carded and one has witnessed a plethora of these where teams have the opportunity to mount a dangerous counter attack and one of their players is taken down.I was making reference to fouls in different situations committed to break up the play and stop teams from building an attack and indeed momentum. Edited by Willo (08 Mar 2018 8.36am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chateauferret 10 Mar 18 9.56pm | |
---|---|
Was complete, utter and total s***e today. Vivid imagination, selective blindness and top-six bias all rampant in the second half. Soerloth scored a nailed-on legit goal and somehow he manages to "see" a foul by one of our attackers in the box just beforehand. Nobody else sees a damn thing and the pundits and commentators are baffled. WTF had he blown up for? The only possible infringement was Cahill pulling (I think) Tomkins to the ground, so even if Soerloth missed it was still a pen. But this arsehole gives Chelsea a free f***ing kick for absolutely nothing. Now, if there's a foul or an offside or something and the officials don't see it, I can kind of understand, because they can't see anything. But guessing, assuming, imaginging or as in this case just plain making stuff up to give a decision that isn't there in the first place is bang on unacceptable. And it happens plenty. Then at the end Chelsea players start shoving Tomkins about and trying to pick fights, and in the end one of them stops up to the linesman and not only tells him what's what but actually strikes his flag out of his hand in his anger. And he does f*** all about it. Yet last time he reffed us he booked Wilf just for speaking to him. He's f***ing toilet and he should be struck off.
============ |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
the silurian The garden of England.(not really) 10 Mar 18 10.09pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by chateauferret
Was complete, utter and total s***e today. Vivid imagination, selective blindness and top-six bias all rampant in the second half. Soerloth scored a nailed-on legit goal and somehow he manages to "see" a foul by one of our attackers in the box just beforehand. Nobody else sees a damn thing and the pundits and commentators are baffled. WTF had he blown up for? The only possible infringement was Cahill pulling (I think) Tomkins to the ground, so even if Soerloth missed it was still a pen. But this arsehole gives Chelsea a free f***ing kick for absolutely nothing. Now, if there's a foul or an offside or something and the officials don't see it, I can kind of understand, because they can't see anything. But guessing, assuming, imaginging or as in this case just plain making stuff up to give a decision that isn't there in the first place is bang on unacceptable. And it happens plenty. Then at the end Chelsea players start shoving Tomkins about and trying to pick fights, and in the end one of them stops up to the linesman and not only tells him what's what but actually strikes his flag out of his hand in his anger. And he does f*** all about it. Yet last time he reffed us he booked Wilf just for speaking to him. He's f***ing toilet and he should be struck off. Yeah but no but!!! He will be 'forensically assessed' and told that he did VERY VERY well and 'keep up the good work'!!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Tyke Exile Portuguese Cove, Nova Scotia 11 Mar 18 2.36am | |
---|---|
That's 3 points he has cost us this season.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Gary St.Andrews Kenley 11 Mar 18 8.40am | |
---|---|
He wasn’t great and the disallowed goal summed him up really.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
southnorwoodhill 11 Mar 18 9.17am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by chateauferret
Was complete, utter and total s***e today. Vivid imagination, selective blindness and top-six bias all rampant in the second half. Soerloth scored a nailed-on legit goal and somehow he manages to "see" a foul by one of our attackers in the box just beforehand. Nobody else sees a damn thing and the pundits and commentators are baffled. WTF had he blown up for? The only possible infringement was Cahill pulling (I think) Tomkins to the ground, so even if Soerloth missed it was still a pen. But this arsehole gives Chelsea a free f***ing kick for absolutely nothing. Now, if there's a foul or an offside or something and the officials don't see it, I can kind of understand, because they can't see anything. But guessing, assuming, imaginging or as in this case just plain making stuff up to give a decision that isn't there in the first place is bang on unacceptable. And it happens plenty. Then at the end Chelsea players start shoving Tomkins about and trying to pick fights, and in the end one of them stops up to the linesman and not only tells him what's what but actually strikes his flag out of his hand in his anger. And he does f*** all about it. Yet last time he reffed us he booked Wilf just for speaking to him. He's f***ing toilet and he should be struck off.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Booted Eagle Bristol 11 Mar 18 9.34am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
He owes us one Two now
“ [T]here are known knowns; there are things we know that we know.There are known unknowns; that is to say there are things that, we now know we don't know.But there are also unknown unknowns – there are things we do not know we don't know. ” |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
topcat Holmesdale / Surbiton 11 Mar 18 9.53am | |
---|---|
Ruled out a perfectly good goal Crap ref.
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SeagullHunter Reading 11 Mar 18 9.57am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by chateauferret
Was complete, utter and total s***e today. Vivid imagination, selective blindness and top-six bias all rampant in the second half. Soerloth scored a nailed-on legit goal and somehow he manages to "see" a foul by one of our attackers in the box just beforehand. Nobody else sees a damn thing and the pundits and commentators are baffled. WTF had he blown up for? The only possible infringement was Cahill pulling (I think) Tomkins to the ground, so even if Soerloth missed it was still a pen. But this arsehole gives Chelsea a free f***ing kick for absolutely nothing. Now, if there's a foul or an offside or something and the officials don't see it, I can kind of understand, because they can't see anything. But guessing, assuming, imaginging or as in this case just plain making stuff up to give a decision that isn't there in the first place is bang on unacceptable. And it happens plenty. Then at the end Chelsea players start shoving Tomkins about and trying to pick fights, and in the end one of them stops up to the linesman and not only tells him what's what but actually strikes his flag out of his hand in his anger. And he does f*** all about it. Yet last time he reffed us he booked Wilf just for speaking to him. He's f***ing toilet and he should be struck off. Surely Willo cant defend this performance..
Dont let Cabaye go |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chateauferret 11 Mar 18 9.59am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by southnorwoodhill
That one rather undermines its credibility by trying to claim that the penalty against City was bogus and that Puncheon should have been sent off; true, he might have been, but de Bruyne made himself out to be mortally wounded and yet played a full game two days later and the only person who gut properly hurt was Puncheon himself. Whilst I'm sure that there's a connection between betting syndicates and dodgy referees, this particular site doesn't seem to me all that objective and does seem to score more points for emotive ranting than concrete evidence. Although after last night I can well understand the temptation to indulge in the former - I had to contribute fulsomely to the swear box after that disgrace. Edited by chateauferret (11 Mar 2018 10.01am)
============ |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
AppleSource Tel Aviv 11 Mar 18 12.40pm | |
---|---|
Not to mention this: [Tweet Link]
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 11 Mar 18 12.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SeagullHunter
Surely Willo cant defend this performance.. I never witnessed the game (Do not possess BT Sport) so I cannot make any judgement as to the referee's performance.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.