This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Fundamentalists at it again. ..
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 tome  Inner Tantalus Time. 03 Nov 17 9.12pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I'm not sure anything we say on this football general forum is going to make much of a difference to be honest. It'll only make a difference to our own sanity, that's for sure. But I do think it can be one way of changing minds - getting opposing views (at least when the insults stop for a bit). After all, we've seen facebook and other social media tend to group people in such a way they are preaching to the converted quite often. This is one way of getting around that. The debate would be pretty one sided if we started talking about Millwall though.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
Stirlingsays  03 Nov 17 9.25pm |
 |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by tome
It'll only make a difference to our own sanity, that's for sure. But I do think it can be one way of changing minds - getting opposing views (at least when the insults stop for a bit). After all, we've seen facebook and other social media tend to group people in such a way they are preaching to the converted quite often. This is one way of getting around that. The debate would be pretty one sided if we started talking about Millwall though. I suppose there is a catharsis element to it all. The echo chamber can become a 'safe' space and most ideas should always be open to debate for healthy freedom of speech. I can't deny I....like Nick...enjoy a bit of back and forth....but that can also be tedious and as has been rightly pointed out to me....it's not much fun as a spectator sport for the boards. It does need to be cut back on I think. I essentially agree that any political decision that introduces more religion into politics isn't a good thing....well, it's pretty bad. Is Christianity a threat to secularism?........well as it introduced secularism itself I doubt it's going to make much difference....But having said that, I've never been ok with the mixing of church and state....It's a step back for our most important democracy.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| tome Inner Tantalus Time. 03 Nov 17 9.32pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I suppose there is a catharsis element to it all. The echo chamber can become a 'safe' space and most ideas should always be open to debate for healthy freedom of speech. I can't deny I....like Nick...enjoy a bit of back and forth....but that can also be tedious and as has been rightly pointed out to me....it's not much fun as a spectator sport for the boards. It does need to be cut back on I think. I essentially agree that any political decision that introduces more religion into politics isn't a good thing....well, it's pretty bad. Is Christianity a threat to secularism?........well as it introduced secularism itself I doubt it's going to make much difference....But having said that, I've never been ok with the mixing of church and state....It's a step back for our most important democracy. Yeah, I am not comfortable with the concept of 'safe spaces' but I guess some individuals needs encouragement to talk about their views where previously they have been intimidated. But in universities, public boards and so on all ideas should be up for discussion and assumptions speared. But I reckon it goes both ways - some are reticent, others belicose - and there needs to be a mid-way point between the two for reasonable doubt and challenge. Question is, how do you deal with zealots like Pruitt?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 03 Nov 17 9.44pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by tome
Yeah, I am not comfortable with the concept of 'safe spaces' but I guess some individuals needs encouragement to talk about their views where previously they have been intimidated. But in universities, public boards and so on all ideas should be up for discussion and assumptions speared. But I reckon it goes both ways - some are reticent, others belicose - and there needs to be a mid-way point between the two for reasonable doubt and challenge. Question is, how do you deal with zealots like Pruitt? I think you win the next election. I think this is Trump throwing red meat to supporters. He's famously not religious but he knows what side his bread is buttered. America is so polarised and at such loggerheads with each other the Democrats need a calm leader who engages with civility....I think that works against Trump with floating voters....Clinton tried but she was too establishment. If Sanders gets the gig....will he be too old? If he gets the gig it will be interesting.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
cryrst  The garden of England 03 Nov 17 9.46pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
What? The point I made is pathetic? Why? What do you mean by 'flat out how I see it'? No hedgehog.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| cryrst The garden of England 03 Nov 17 9.48pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Page 5 hedgehog
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| hedgehog50 Croydon 03 Nov 17 9.51pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
No hedgehog. My apologies, I hadn't read your other post on the 'pathetic' thread.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| cryrst The garden of England 03 Nov 17 9.53pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
My apologies, I hadn't read your other post on the 'pathetic' thread. Cool I'm thick skinned and not as thespianistic as some learned fellows on here.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 Hrolf The Ganger 03 Nov 17 10.21pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
I have a pro west stance. That's why I want all the s***tery rooted out. You don't do that by staying quiet. 100% agree. We need to route out ALL religious nuttery. It's a pity we are also importing so much of it don't you think?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 03 Nov 17 10.32pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
100% agree. We need to route out ALL religious nuttery. It's a pity we are also importing so much of it don't you think? All those new churches everywhere. Spreading peace and love.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 03 Nov 17 10.36pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
All those new churches everywhere. Spreading peace and love. If only...
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| tome Inner Tantalus Time. 03 Nov 17 11.22pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
100% agree. We need to route out ALL religious nuttery. It's a pity we are also importing so much of it don't you think? How much do you think we import versus is developed after they arrive? A few nutters are born (the chronically psychopathic perhaps) but I think most are nurtured. Not sure how you stop it being nurtured though. Stigmatising people seems to have the opposite affect but I'm not sure how you get isolated / fearful people (of whatever stripe) to engage constructively. Come across some ideas in education, but the system is so in hock to exams there's little room or resource for other things.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.