You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Royston Hodgson give 40m to spend in January
November 24 2024 8.23pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Royston Hodgson give 40m to spend in January

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >

  

chateauferret Flag 14 Sep 17 7.59am

He wouldn't get Wilshere even if he wanted him. Wilshere's already rejected us twice. Probably doesn't get on with our physio.

 


============
The Ferret
============

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Part Time James Flag 14 Sep 17 8.07am Send a Private Message to Part Time James Add Part Time James as a friend

Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly

FFP limits what we can spend.
The priority for Roy is to sell the deadwood to generate some additional funds,..say another £5, or possibly £6

Five quid? I think you have over priced Jordan Mutch a bit there.

 




Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 14 Sep 17 9.44am Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by DaWick

Should have given that money to FDB last month and avoided this whole fiasco

If Jack Wilkshire is Roy's master plan than we are f***ed. Let's just hope this is tabloid bulls***

On a side note I would have been very happy with Woy 12 months ago but feel differently now. Not sure why - probably because I am a FDB fan!

Only the article is BS and completely made up.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
dannyh Flag wherever I lay my hat....... 14 Sep 17 10.41am Send a Private Message to dannyh Add dannyh as a friend

To those slating Wilshire, he would walk into our midfield with the only player being RLC that is potentially better.

 


"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
alaneagle1 Flag Dunstable,Bedfordshire.England 14 Sep 17 10.44am Send a Private Message to alaneagle1 Add alaneagle1 as a friend

Originally posted by dannyh

To those slating Wilshire, he would walk into our midfield with the only player being RLC that is potentially better.

Danny don't you mean hobble.!!!
He would be good company for Connor.!!!

 


Palace 13th 2017/18.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
NEILLO Flag Shoreham-by-Sea 14 Sep 17 11.42am Send a Private Message to NEILLO Add NEILLO as a friend

Originally posted by alaneagle1

Danny don't you mean hobble.!!!
He would be good company for Connor.!!!

Stop nicking my lines Al

 


Old, Ungifted and White

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Lyons550 Flag Shirley 14 Sep 17 11.48am Send a Private Message to Lyons550 Add Lyons550 as a friend

Originally posted by dannyh

To those slating Wilshire, he would walk into our midfield with the only player being RLC that is potentially better.


This^^^

 


The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
spartakev2 Flag Anerley 14 Sep 17 11.58am Send a Private Message to spartakev2 Add spartakev2 as a friend

Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly

FFP limits what we can spend
.
The priority for Roy is to sell the deadwood to generate some additional funds,..say another £5, or possibly £6

Doesn't seem to limit other teams, look at nan city and psg, even Huddersfield spent almost 40M. WBA seemed yo soend loads, everton too. Never heard any other side say we can't buy z player because of FFP

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 14 Sep 17 12.04pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by spartakev2

Doesn't seem to limit other teams, look at nan city and psg, even Huddersfield spent almost 40M. WBA seemed yo soend loads, everton too. Never heard any other side say we can't buy z player because of FFP

Huddersfield aren't limited by increase on last season in prem. wba have done great business without spending loads. Everton have sold players worth fortunes so net spend isn't that high. Correct me if I'm wrong on those.

Man c and PSG can afford it and fines.

Our wages are 9th and income 14th. Is that not enough?

We did intend to pay £10 mil for a striker and fvcked it up.

We're on our actual affordable limit irrespective of FFP. Or do you want us to go over both, pay the fines and relegate ourselves by doing so and be in even more trouble trying to correct it on parachute money and bouncing back?

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
NEILLO Flag Shoreham-by-Sea 14 Sep 17 12.11pm Send a Private Message to NEILLO Add NEILLO as a friend

Maybe this £40m will be underwritten by selling Zaha....

 


Old, Ungifted and White

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Deleted11 14 Sep 17 12.14pm

I actually hope this is false. i honestly don't see why we need any signings for the rest of the season, unless Wilf or Benteke get injured. The squad we have is good enough to stay in this league under Roy.
With all due respect to Roy, he is not going to be our manager, probably much longer than this season. He's been given a two year deal basically so he's compensated for keeping us up this year and we'll get a new manager next season.
I always wanted Marco Silva out of all the candidates, but I honestly have no idea who we would go for next season.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 14 Sep 17 12.22pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by Jway89

I actually hope this is false. i honestly don't see why we need any signings for the rest of the season, unless Wilf or Benteke get injured. The squad we have is good enough to stay in this league under Roy.
With all due respect to Roy, he is not going to be our manager, probably much longer than this season. He's been given a two year deal basically so he's compensated for keeping us up this year and we'll get a new manager next season.
I always wanted Marco Silva out of all the candidates, but I honestly have no idea who we would go for next season.

Hopefully Silva will be an option after a decent season and delivering over expectations as he did at hull. Watford may do us a favour and sack him.

The £40 mil is bollox. It's the mirror ffs. It'll be more like £10-£15 mil plus player sales revenue.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Royston Hodgson give 40m to spend in January