You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > New rule - May explain lack of recruitment ?
November 24 2024 11.15pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

New rule - May explain lack of recruitment ?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 2 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

  

Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 05 Sep 17 10.13am Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Originally posted by Dan89

[Link]

This is a link of the 25 man squad and despite Costa not in favour and remy leaving after deadline day. Remy was named in the squad of 25 man squad. His now left so they have a place available. That's the best I found so far.

Thank you for the 'Link' however it doesn't categorically state that ALL players over 21 have to be named in the 25 man squad.

I am fully aware of the HGP criteria and the fact that those under 21 need not be named in the '25' but not aware of the so called 'New rule' which you have mentioned. In any event one doesn't HAVE to name 25 players which of course has been applicable to us !

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Midlands Eagle Flag 05 Sep 17 10.16am Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle Add Midlands Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Willo

In any event one doesn't HAVE to name 25 players which of course has been applicable to us !

I believe that you do if you have 25 or more eligible players which is why we've had to include the walking wounded

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Dan89 Flag Se25 05 Sep 17 10.17am Send a Private Message to Dan89 Add Dan89 as a friend

Originally posted by Willo

Thank you for the 'Link' however it doesn't categorically state that ALL players over 21 have to be named in the 25 man squad.

I am fully aware of the HGP criteria and the fact that those under 21 need not be named in the '25' but not aware of the so called 'New rule' which you have mentioned. In any event one doesn't HAVE to name 25 players which of course has been applicable to us !

Why has the likes of lapado been named along with mutch and Kai Kai to a degree where 12 months these players weren't considered good enough. Given a free transfer of boateng being able to leave. I haven't got a defiant link.

 


Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Dan89 Flag Se25 05 Sep 17 10.27am Send a Private Message to Dan89 Add Dan89 as a friend

Here are willo
[Link]

Number 9)

IMG_0452.JPG Attachment: IMG_0452.JPG (67.26Kb)

 


Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
alaneagle1 Flag Dunstable,Bedfordshire.England 05 Sep 17 10.37am Send a Private Message to alaneagle1 Add alaneagle1 as a friend

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

Jonny Williams was shoved out on loan on transfer deadline day so that he didn't have to be included.

I assume that long term injured players like Wickham also have to be included even if they are unlikely to play so we should come to an agreement with a League 2 club to take him on loan for six months even if he can't actually play. We could always bung them a few grand for their helpfulness

Well that contradicts your previous reply.

 


Palace 13th 2017/18.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
alaneagle1 Flag Dunstable,Bedfordshire.England 05 Sep 17 10.47am Send a Private Message to alaneagle1 Add alaneagle1 as a friend

Originally posted by Dan89

Here are willo
[Link]

Number 9)

Good research Dann explains Mutch being named and Everton naming Bolasie and Coleman.

 


Palace 13th 2017/18.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Dan89 Flag Se25 05 Sep 17 10.57am Send a Private Message to Dan89 Add Dan89 as a friend

Originally posted by alaneagle1

Good research Dann explains Mutch being named and Everton naming Bolasie and Coleman.

Thanks. Yeah definitely. The worry is mutch going to use this rule in his favour again, next year and other deadwood. Instead of playing, does this rule favour them rather than the club itself.

Edited by Dan89 (05 Sep 2017 10.57am)

Edited by Dan89 (05 Sep 2017 11.03am)

 


Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Dan89 Flag Se25 05 Sep 17 11.04am Send a Private Message to Dan89 Add Dan89 as a friend

Willo always goes quite, when his in the wrong.

 


Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
alaneagle1 Flag Dunstable,Bedfordshire.England 05 Sep 17 11.36am Send a Private Message to alaneagle1 Add alaneagle1 as a friend

Originally posted by Dan89

Thanks. Yeah definitely. The worry is mutch going to use this rule in his favour again, next year and other deadwood. Instead of playing, does this rule favour them rather than the club itself.

Edited by Dan89 (05 Sep 2017 10.57am)

Edited by Dan89 (05 Sep 2017 11.03am)

It's not so much the rule for Mutch !!! It's his contract,will have to be paid up to allow a space in January for an over 21.

 


Palace 13th 2017/18.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 05 Sep 17 11.43am Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by alaneagle1

It's not so much the rule for Mutch !!! It's his contract,will have to be paid up to allow a space in January for an over 21.

Let me get this right. We have 1 space left.

If we sign 2 older players in January, what are our options, if everything else stays the same?

Could we include those 2 and give Mutch a job in the kitchen?

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Dan89 Flag Se25 05 Sep 17 11.45am Send a Private Message to Dan89 Add Dan89 as a friend

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

Let me get this right. We have 1 space left.

If we sign 2 older players in January, what are our options, if everything else stays the same?

Could we include those 2 and give Mutch a job in the kitchen?

We pay off or loan out lapado, mutch or any other deadwood otherwise no room it looks like.

 


Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Dan89 Flag Se25 05 Sep 17 11.48am Send a Private Message to Dan89 Add Dan89 as a friend

Originally posted by alaneagle1

It's not so much the rule for Mutch !!! It's his contract,will have to be paid up to allow a space in January for an over 21.

I saw a report in the mirror on deadline day that freedman was tasked out trying to ship out 6 players on deadline day. I think he managed to get rid of Anderson, Williams, boateng.

Edited by Dan89 (05 Sep 2017 11.52am)

IMG_0453.JPG Attachment: IMG_0453.JPG (203.23Kb)

 


Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 2 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > New rule - May explain lack of recruitment ?