Because he clearly hasn't got a clue
He's got to be the least experienced , no I think Ernie Whalley had more experience in the early 80's
Hes crap
And unless we get rid of him he will take us down 100%

He has won 4 titles, more than any other Palace manager.
All this hysteria because we have lost one game in which we had more chances, but strikers didn't convert. He can't be blamed if a striker misses surely.

Does that mean that we won't lose to Liverpool because we never do?

Schteve McLaren won the title there. What matters is here and the jury is out, which is why his changes shouldn't be so dramatic.

'Respect the point' is Pulis and Sam's mantra. 'Respect any point' might end up being our's for Frank.

We didn't have more chances. They scored 3, had the 2nd minute shot 12 yards out from the cross on our left where there wasn't a left back and the two one on ones they should've scored. To say se had more chances is taking clutching at straws to an extreme.

But it's just one game. However, a lot of us are laying out these issues where we see this might be going and end up after 5 games and 4 winnable ones, and then 3 vs the top 4.

COYP

People seem to be proclaiming that he's completely inflexible, and will persist with this system even if we're heading for relegation. I've got no idea where this perception comes from and fully expect the system to change if it doesn't work out.

It stems from the fact he said 3-4-3 suits us more which it very obviously did not. He brought in 3 players and it still didn't. It's still at least 3 players short. To do what he would like to do would cost £100 mil to do it properly and safely right now.

He wants to play 3-4-3 because that's the trend and is what the top 7 managers are playing. Well we're not top 7 but bottom 7. Either it's ignoring what squad are and aren't capable of or it's a very poor appraisal. More the former than the latter with the haste Frank decided on committing to 3-4-3.

This is where the perception of stubbornness has come from.

COYP