You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Google memo.
November 22 2024 5.59pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Google memo.

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 2 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

  

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 08 Aug 17 11.37am Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Mapletree

It is no surprise who the OP is here, a man on a mission.

The HOL response is surprising. It's a free market so the guy should have joined another company if he doesn't like the Google ethos. From what little I have read the memo is dodgy pseudo science. He or she hasn't read their John Stuart Mill.

Attacking the company goes against his (or her) contract and naturally led to the sack. End of.

Oh really?
I'm expressing an opinion. Got a problem with that?

You are being deliberately obtuse if you claim not to see what is happening here. Just remember this kind of policy is easily dismissed until you become the target.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 08 Aug 17 12.06pm

I wasn't aware that engineers were involved in hiring policies. Now whilst he might have a point, I'm not really sure that most companies want to get into a public argument about their employment practices and initiatives - with their own employee(s).

I don't like the idea of 'diversity hires' but I understand the logic behind them, and the necessity based on social research.

I don't like the idea of restricting what people can and cannot say at work, but I do understand that it can be reasonable, when your the company that faces the law suit for hostile work environments - and I do find it a bit strange that people would have to be concerned about the language use and what they say in a professional work environment that might be causing offence to people (I generally don't talk about race, religion, politics, gender at work anyhow, unless someone broaches the subject).

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Jimenez Flag SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 08 Aug 17 2.01pm Send a Private Message to Jimenez Add Jimenez as a friend

Originally posted by Mapletree

It is no surprise who the OP is here, a man on a mission.

The HOL response is surprising. It's a free market so the guy should have joined another company if he doesn't like the Google ethos. From what little I have read the memo is dodgy pseudo science. He or she hasn't read their John Stuart Mill.

Attacking the company goes against his (or her) contract and naturally led to the sack. End of.

Aha so the boots on the other foot now. I can recall the times when you weren't hired unless you joined the union. Most of the union reps were well union reps because they weren't up to the job anyway.
With UCATT amongst the worst.

 


Pro USA & Israel

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Ray in Houston Flag Houston 08 Aug 17 3.14pm Send a Private Message to Ray in Houston Add Ray in Houston as a friend

Originally posted by wordup

America is certainly a country of contrasts and extremes when it comes to the workplace and society. You have progressives shouting down a man who clearly at least has a point - in my view this type of job does tend to appeal more to men.

Then on the other hand, you have a president gunning to kick out patriots serving their country because he decides out of nowhere that they're now unable to do a job they've been doing fine for years.


The United States is about half the population of Europe, but has the same number of states making up the federation. If you think about how different the nationalities are of European countries, just apply that to the different states of the United States.

As for specific jobs appealing to men, I think men have said this about every job that's ever been. We have women (and trans people) serving in front line combat these days, so I think a little software engineering would appeal to at least some women in the population.

Edited by Ray in Houston (08 Aug 2017 3.16pm)

 


We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 08 Aug 17 3.19pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Ray in Houston


The United States is about half the population of Europe, but has the same number of states making up the federation. If you think about how different the nationalities are of European countries, just apply that the different states of the United States.

As for specific jobs appealing to men, I think men have said this about every job that's ever been. We have women (and trans people) serving in front line combat these days, so I think a little software engineering would appeal to at least some women in the population.

Did they have to lower the physical standards for women to serve in the front line?

I weigh 260 pounds of mostly muscle. If I needed carrying or dragging to safety I'd expect a women fighting on the front line to be physically able to do it.

Otherwise....if that isn't the case....then what has happened has nothing to do with equality.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Kermit8 Flag Hevon 08 Aug 17 3.22pm Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Did they have to lower the physical standards for women to serve in the front line?

I weigh 260 pounds of mostly muscle. If I needed carrying or dragging to safety I'd expect a women fighting on the front line to be physically able to do it.

Otherwise....if that isn't the case....then what has happened has nothing to do with equality.

You are 19stone of mostly muscle? At your age?

You are taking the piss............down to the GP to get it tested.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 08 Aug 17 3.28pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Did they have to lower the physical standards for women to serve in the front line?

I weigh 260 pounds of mostly muscle. If I needed carrying or dragging to safety I'd expect a women fighting on the front line to be physically able to do it.

Otherwise....if that isn't the case....then what has happened has nothing to do with equality.

I weigh 250lbs. Pull ups are a bitch.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 08 Aug 17 3.29pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

I weigh 250lbs. Pull ups are a bitch.

Oorah!

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 08 Aug 17 3.30pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Kermit8

You are 19stone of mostly muscle? At your age?

You are taking the piss............down to the GP to get it tested.

It's mostly muscle in the same way you're mostly Scottish.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Kermit8 Flag Hevon 08 Aug 17 3.36pm Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

It's mostly muscle in the same way you're mostly Scottish.

50% has never been mostly. I do hope you are not teaching maths. And ffs cut down the junk food and sugar. Don't want any RIP Stirling threads just yet.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 08 Aug 17 3.39pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Kermit8

50% has never been mostly. I do hope you are not teaching maths. And ffs cut down the junk food and sugar. Don't want any RIP Stirling threads just yet.

I thank you....good to see you back here by the way....nice to have something to rant about.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
wordup Flag 08 Aug 17 3.46pm

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

I wasn't aware that engineers were involved in hiring policies. Now whilst he might have a point, I'm not really sure that most companies want to get into a public argument about their employment practices and initiatives - with their own employee(s).

I don't like the idea of 'diversity hires' but I understand the logic behind them, and the necessity based on social research.

I don't like the idea of restricting what people can and cannot say at work, but I do understand that it can be reasonable, when your the company that faces the law suit for hostile work environments - and I do find it a bit strange that people would have to be concerned about the language use and what they say in a professional work environment that might be causing offence to people (I generally don't talk about race, religion, politics, gender at work anyhow, unless someone broaches the subject).

Firing the guy was way over the top. He didn't go on an angry rant, it was a considered view.

I guess from Google's pov the traction this manifesto got doesn't align with how people perceive the company. They care about their bottom line above all else and don't want constant public debates about managerial policies started by any tom, dick or harry within the company so tried to shut this down. The only way to prove them wrong is to stop using their products.

It's worth mentioning that 'Political affiliations or activities' is a protected class in California and so I expect this guy to take legal action and wouldn't blame him if he did.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 2 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Google memo.