This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Southampton_Eagle At the after party 28 Jul 17 7.04am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Lyons550
Whilst I agree there's no place for homophobia.. This is a classic case of throwing the baby out with the bathwater...one thread...one in how many hundred focus upon...and even then just a few posts within it. I think the cause would be much better served by not undertaking such a contrived approach to making a mountain out of a molehill...context is everything. The irony that a programme trying to portray a stereotype..is in fact through the lack of context promoting its own stereotypes of how it perceives football fans... You couldn't make it up. It was definitely agenda driven but unfortunately clowns like Parchmore couldn't wait to jump in. I hope he's enjoying his fifteen minutes of fame.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
kev64 Cambs 28 Jul 17 7.06am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Bangell
Okay, have now watched the relevant part of the documentary. I was correct that Parchmore was one of the fools quoted, surprise surprise. I was intrigued to see Gareth quote one of my responses as an example of an opinion which causes him to put his head in his hands - a state of despair which could perhaps have been avoided if he'd read the whole message, or even the whole sentence. Here is what I wrote: 'I don't think many people who join in the 'Brighton take it up the bum' chants have any real malicious intent, and are being knowingly juvenile for a laugh. But the chants do effectively put all homosexuals on the wrong side of the 'us vs them' divide, and equate them with a range of undesirable characteristics. Considering the history of instances of homophobia in football, the fact that these massed chants perpetuate intolerance, and the fact that there's little room for subtlety when it comes to a whole crowd chanting, I should think this sort of thing is best avoided - especially given the media profile of our club now.' (https://www.holmesdale.net/page.php?id=106&tid=166166&page=2) Gareth only quoted the section in bold. Furthermore, the documentary makes it sound as if the author of my statement was also the author of the message underneath, the content of which I did not agree with. Here is the other thing I had to say in another thread on the matter, which perhaps makes me clearer: 'If I can offer an overly intellectual opinion, I did make an interesting note from Randall Collins' book on the micro-sociology of violence recently: 'Despite the use of sexist epithets to insult men they do not like, the hooligans of the 1980s were ardent admirers of Margaret Thatcher and the queen—presumably because these could be used to assert English solidarity and superiority, and to put down respectable educated liberals and leftists; although in Italy they chant ‘f*** the Pope!’, at home they defend the Catholic church, out of hostility to the Anglican establishment (Buford 1993: 95). The pattern is much like that analyzed by Katz (1999) in his study of freeway road rage: curses are brought to one's lips because they fit the particular target one is confronting at the moment; they need not be based on deeply held beliefs, and the repertoire can be inconsistent and contradictory from occasion to occasion.' I'd suggest that homophobic taunts are a similar phenomenon: those chanting mostly aren't deep-seated homophobes, but instrumentalise a background convention of homophobia, as Anthony King has argued in the case of most racist chanting. So I don't think that most people joining in with these chants are particularly hateful; but intent is somewhat irrelevant when the effect is chanting that equates homosexuality with all sorts of negative traits. There's no room for subtlety in a crowd.' (https://www.holmesdale.net/page.php?id=106&tid=166664&page=2) Gareth only quotes one message of opposition to homophobia, when these constituted the majority of responses. I posted in opposition to the 'gays = paedophiles' remark which he showcased, for example (https://www.holmesdale.net/page.php?id=106&tid=166866&page=4). So if Gareth believes that I am one of the culprits of internet homophobia, then I would be very happy to talk directly with him as he requests and show him that I am not. The thing is, Gareth: I'm on your side! I think homophobia is a blight on football and on society, and should be eradicated. But if you have to distort facts to prove that point, you're playing into the hands of the conspiracy-theorist homophobes who claim there's a gay agenda distorting the facts! This sort of thing is entirely unnecessary, and I have to wonder if you did it deliberately, in order to prove your point that homophobia in football is (I quote) 'slowly but surely getting out of control'. You do not provide adequate evidence for this claim, and while I think homophobia in football is a problem which still exists and urgently needs to be addressed, most football fans and at least these experts who reported to a parliamentary select committee (https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/may/18/football-fans-more-accepting-homosexuality-uk-homophobia-sport-inquiry) will inform you that in fact it is slowly but surely decreasing. I will also send this message to Gareth. Edited by Bangell (28 Jul 2017 12.38am) Unfortunately Gareth, won't give a Fck that you send him your message, him and his BBC cronies are just self serving publicly seekers, trolling for a non story.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ParchmoreEagle Belair 28 Jul 17 7.08am | |
---|---|
All are welcome at Palace.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 28 Jul 17 7.46am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Lyons550
Whilst I agree there's no place for homophobia.. This is a classic case of throwing the baby out with the bathwater...one thread...one in how many hundred focus upon...and even then just a few posts within it. That's not really true though. Every time the word "Brighton" is mentioned all of the homophobic comments are trotted out and although I don't look at other football club forums I'm willing to bet that it's only us that focuses on the homosexual connotation that Palace fans seem to be fixated on with Brighton.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Lyons550 Shirley 28 Jul 17 8.09am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
That's not really true though. Every time the word "Brighton" is mentioned all of the homophobic comments are trotted out and although I don't look at other football club forums I'm willing to bet that it's only us that focuses on the homosexual connotation that Palace fans seem to be fixated on with Brighton.
.. But that's my point.. The programme targets 'the beautiful game' in its title, not a specific rivalry, in which it looks at a narrow section of threads and even then find a few specific posts to try and find and then justify a stereotype...exceedingly poor journalism. Even amateurish... Once you've found the % we then need to find what % that is of the hundreds of thousands of posts on here.. Just one message board for one club.... Only then can their claims be placed in any sort of meaningful context.
The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
c_block_shedevil London 28 Jul 17 8.10am | |
---|---|
Just been reading on Twitter. The homophobic posts are getting dogs abuse from people. Someone even suggested we are like Millwall! How about the homophobic palace fans go and f*** off and support Millwall instead. They won't be missed here. Especially if they are turning my club into a national disgrace. This site once used to be moderated to bits. What's happened? Why were these posters not banned?
I'm tough. I'm ambitious. I know exactly what I want. If that makes me a bitch, I'm OK with that. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Part Time James 28 Jul 17 8.13am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by c_block_shedevil
Just been reading on Twitter. The homophobic posts are getting dogs abuse from people. Someone even suggested we are like Millwall! How about the homophobic palace fans go and f*** off and support Millwall instead. They won't be missed here. Especially if they are turning my club into a national disgrace. This site once used to be moderated to bits. What's happened? Why were these posters not banned? And why was the well poisoner not banned and his thread shut down?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Tez Epsom 28 Jul 17 9.02am | |
---|---|
As several people said (off the top of my head PTJ was the first to suggest it) the thread should have been closed and deleted as soon as it appeared on the forum and Mr Thomas should have been red carded. Regardless of if a journalist or TV producer works for the BBC, ITV, Channel 4, Sky, Fox News, they are always going to sensationalise and manipulate facts according to their own agenda. Gareth Thomas clearly came to this forum with the express intention of getting a few screenshots from a minority of fans making 'gay' jokes and because of the lack of action from the mods, he succeeded. Hope lessons can be learned from this.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Lyons550 Shirley 28 Jul 17 9.03am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by c_block_shedevil
Just been reading on Twitter. The homophobic posts are getting dogs abuse from people. Someone even suggested we are like Millwall! How about the homophobic palace fans go and f*** off and support Millwall instead. They won't be missed here. Especially if they are turning my club into a national disgrace. This site once used to be moderated to bits. What's happened? Why were these posters not banned?
Have you actually read the thread??
The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Goldfiinger Just down the road 28 Jul 17 9.04am | |
---|---|
Does anyone have a link to the thread in question? If he's taken things out of context as has been discussed then I'd suggest a proper complaint is made to the BBC, I'd also suggest contacting the club so the club can review and take any necessary legal action or at least decide if it's required. IF things have been taken out of context. Also was it a sting? Or did he start the topic himself or he just searched the forums until he stumbled across this thread? Edited by Goldfiinger (28 Jul 2017 9.13am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mad4palace 28 Jul 17 9.22am | |
---|---|
Are the threads still up on here? anyone care to link them. Of what I remember he started the threads in Palace Talk which was the wrong section for topics of that nature, then proceeded to engage in the most unprofessional way and didn't offer any website or email we could go to. Something felt incredibly off to me from the outset, I didn't know if he was genuine or a complete troll. I told myself absolutely not to post in his thread, just didn't need the hassle that might come after. Despite seeing some unfortunate homophobia, you could tell that was what he wanted to find, that 1%. I hope at least however, the distinction was made between abuse directed towards him solely for being gay and other things said to him simply for how unprofessional and bizarre his approach was.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Goldfiinger Just down the road 28 Jul 17 9.35am | |
---|---|
It all sounds very strange and a bit sad. Sounds like a complete sting.. and then as if he's had to take half the responses out of context to fit his agenda. If that's true then I'd say the club have a case and a duty to tackle this head on and raise it with the BBC via legal channels. The club try's very hard on the LGBT front and for one man and a twisted documentary to bring that in to jeopardy isn't right or fair.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.