This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
hedgehog50 Croydon 09 Mar 17 1.03pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Philosophy, if I was going to pick a primary influencer. God help us then (if such an entity exists).
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 09 Mar 17 1.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
God help us then (if such an entity exists). What would you choose?
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Part Time James 09 Mar 17 1.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Do you believe that Islamic defined law is reasonable? This is all a bit unusual Probably within fundamentally Islamic countries there is more logic behind it. Our laws probably originated from Christianity to quite a significant extent, despite the country no longer being predominantly Christian. I know what you're saying though Jamie. Religions, in my opinion, when taken literally can create some funny behaviours many of which are unpalatable to outsiders. I don't suppose Matt is about to defend some of the odd crimes and punishments based on religious laws, but when you're in another country and they have laws, you can't defend yourself by querying the origin of the law you've broken.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 09 Mar 17 1.07pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Absurdly stupid, and an excellent example of why religious thinking has no place in determining laws, and the rights of people. Couldn't agree more.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
hedgehog50 Croydon 09 Mar 17 1.16pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
What would you choose? Common sense mainly - with a firm eye on history, custom and tradition.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 09 Mar 17 1.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Part Time James
Probably within fundamentally Islamic countries there is more logic behind it. Our laws probably originated from Christianity to quite a significant extent, despite the country no longer being predominantly Christian. That's not really how logic works. Originally posted by Part Time James
I don't suppose Matt is about to defend some of the odd crimes and punishments based on religious laws, but when you're in another country and they have laws, you can't defend yourself by querying the origin of the law you've broken. Well yes, but then its largely a law that's ignored unless convenient (i.e. she was experiencing stomach cramps and went to a doctor, who then informed the authorities). Its actually a crime punished by prison, when you'd assume that deportation and permanent expulsion would be sufficient.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 09 Mar 17 1.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
What would you choose? It is an evolving process surely. Laws alter through the will of individuals and situations arising that set a new precedent.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 09 Mar 17 1.50pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Common sense mainly - with a firm eye on history, custom and tradition. Common sense doesn't exist in any real conceivable way. Its just a phrase people use to say 'popular', its often not even right. If history, customs and traditions have taught us anything, its that laws need to be established on the basis of reasoned argument and logical conclusions (hence the philosophy aspect, given that the entire basis of philosophy is reasoned argument and establishing a logical conclusion). The philosophy of law is quite an interesting subject.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 09 Mar 17 1.52pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
It is an evolving process surely. Laws alter through the will of individuals and situations arising that set a new precedent. Which is really how philosophy works. Ideas change and evolve over time, and new ideas create a shift in how we view right and wrong. Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Religion had a place in that since it was considered truth, at least by the masses, but now it has no place in law in terms of divine judgment or at least interpretation of divine judgment by men. Of course some of the same guidelines might remain such as the ten commandments for example but clearly morality evolves to reflect the influence of knowledge and society in general as much as the reverse. I prefer ethics to morality, which tends to be based on the idea of a truth - That said there are clearly minimal laws of behaviour that are required for society to operate.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
hedgehog50 Croydon 09 Mar 17 1.55pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Common sense doesn't exist in any real conceivable way. Its just a phrase people use to say 'popular', its often not even right. If history, customs and traditions have taught us anything, its that laws need to be established on the basis of reasoned argument and logical conclusions (hence the philosophy aspect, given that the entire basis of philosophy is reasoned argument and establishing a logical conclusion). The philosophy of law is quite an interesting subject. Of course common sense exists. Whereas philosophy is often deficient in common sense, and is in many cases pure gibberish and nonsense - it can make religion appear in contrast, reasonable and logical.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Part Time James 09 Mar 17 2.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Well yes, but then its largely a law that's ignored unless convenient (i.e. she was experiencing stomach cramps and went to a doctor, who then informed the authorities). Its actually a crime punished by prison, when you'd assume that deportation and permanent expulsion would be sufficient. Logic in that you and I ought to be able to put 2 and 2 together and work out how X country got Y law Jamie. Don't misunderstand me just to prove a different point to the one I was making. I hate religion and think it's all bulls***. I don't disagree with you on that. There are some places that allow cannibalism but if someone rocked up here and had your Mrs with a nice Chianti you'd be a bit miffed right? You wouldn't say "that's it, send them home". The law is the law, if you go somewhere else you find out what the laws are and their associated punishments. If they are f**king ridiculous it doesn't give you carte blanche to go against them and then try to use the stupidity of the law itself as a defence.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
20 Spaces Isnt Enoug Bolton 09 Mar 17 2.06pm | |
---|---|
Can't believe it's taken this long. Must be a record for 'Hol' " Would " [ her ]
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.