This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Fiddler on the roof and everywhere else
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 Cucking Funt  Clapham on the Back 21 Feb 17 7.50pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by martin2412
I think it was money well spent. I wouldn't mind paying all of the jihadist scum If I knew they were going to blow their own brains out. It's probably cheaper than putting the army over there to do it. But a bullet to the head is a matter of mere pence.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| hedgehog50 Croydon 22 Feb 17 8.30am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
There is absolutely nothing out there which says he received £1mill except via this dubious claim/lie by The Daily Mail with absolutely nothing to back it up proof wise. Yeah, opinion is divided. You think he wasn't paid anything, the rest of the world thinks he was.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 22 Feb 17 8.52am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
Guantanamo detainees were all given compensation, though, weren't they? All that's at issue is the matter of quantum and the Mail may or may not have got it right. Big deal. The fact is, this c*nt skanked the UK taxpayer out of whatever and promptly went on to demonstrate that the septics were absolutely right to bang him up in the first place. Good riddance to scum.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 Penge Eagle Beckenham 22 Feb 17 9.00am |
 |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Erm I think he was pretty radicalised beforehand, hence the reason why he was in there in the first place! But of course, it's the West's fault and not him...!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
|
Kermit8  Hevon 22 Feb 17 9.08am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Yeah, opinion is divided. You think he wasn't paid anything, the rest of the world thinks he was. Do we know he was yet or are we still on "think" he was as you stated above? If you have proof you just need to link it in on your next post. That'll be dandy.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 22 Feb 17 9.22am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Penge Eagle
Erm I think he was pretty radicalised beforehand, hence the reason why he was in there in the first place! But of course, it's the West's fault and not him...! Really?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 22 Feb 17 9.30am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
The release of Fiddler form Guantanamo Bay followed a high profile campaign by the, blind in every sense of the word, then Labour Home Secretary David Blunkett for him to be let out — just two years after he was captured by US troops in Afghanistan. Mr Blunkett said at the time: "No one who is returned … will actually be a threat to the security of the British people.” Because imprisoning people without trial, torture and cruel and unusual punishments, that's the kind of thing we should definitely get behind. If we were going to imprison these people indefinitely, then we should have classed them as Prisoners of War, under the Geneva convention.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| hedgehog50 Croydon 22 Feb 17 9.34am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
Do we know he was yet or are we still on "think" he was as you stated above? If you have proof you just need to link it in on your next post. That'll be dandy. Anything to oblige.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| steeleye20 Croydon 22 Feb 17 9.37am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Really? Yes Plymouth and Bristol are behind all this.....
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| hedgehog50 Croydon 22 Feb 17 9.38am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Because imprisoning people without trial, torture and cruel and unusual punishments, that's the kind of thing we should definitely get behind. If we were going to imprison these people indefinitely, then we should have classed them as Prisoners of War, under the Geneva convention. 'We' dind't imprison anyone, the USA did. We detain lunatics indefinitely, why not detain those lunatics?
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Kermit8 Hevon 22 Feb 17 9.38am |
|
|---|---|
|
I meant proof about the £1,000,000 as per your opening post. We all know some compensation was paid. That's not news.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| hedgehog50 Croydon 22 Feb 17 9.43am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
I meant proof about the £1,000,000 as per your opening post. We all know some compensation was paid. That's not news. Ken Clarke in his statement to the House, said the cost was £30-£50 million. There were 16 Guantanamo men involved. Taking £40 million as the sum paid out (allowing a few million for Ken's lunches) that averages out at £2.5 million per terrorist.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.