This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Hope he's lying
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 rob1969  Banstead Surrey 02 Dec 16 1.30pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Would really like to see DD back in - should improve set piece defending.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Palace BANANA Ringmer, Lewes, East Sussex 02 Dec 16 1.43pm |
|
|---|---|
|
AP will have to make some changes with CW out for the rest of the season.. good luck Connor for a speedy recovery.. and YC suspended after getting a poor booking at Swansea.. still don't understand why he was booked and the two defenders obstructing him weren't even spoken to.. feel AP needs to bring in Delaney to organise the back four and Flamini to sit in front of them and organise the rest..
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 Bill Glazier Mitcham 02 Dec 16 2.19pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Skills36
Hope this is what happens It will be the wrong move.Fryers or a left footed player at Left Back.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Littlebogreek  02 Dec 16 2.23pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Bill Glazier
It will be the wrong move.Fryers or a left footed player at Left Back. I'd play Fryers as he cant do any worse than Kelly. I feel sorry for Kelly playing out of position but his confidence looks shot - at least Fryers can get forward and his defending certainly cant be worse than Kelly at the moment. Incidentally, why did we bother to play Fryers in the friendlies? He did okay and we are crying out for cover at that role - he must be seriously bad in training. Edited by Littlebogreek (02 Dec 2016 2.23pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| matthau South Croydon 02 Dec 16 2.25pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Littlebogreek
I'd play Fryers as he cant do any worse than Kelly. I feel sorry for Kelly playing out of position but his confidence looks shot - at least Fryers can get forward and his defending certainly cant be worse than Kelly at the moment. Incidentally, why did we bother to play Fryers in the friendlies? He did okay and we are crying out for cover at that role - he must be seriously bad in training. Edited by Littlebogreek (02 Dec 2016 2.23pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Bill Glazier Mitcham 02 Dec 16 2.28pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Littlebogreek
I'd play Fryers as he cant do any worse than Kelly. I feel sorry for Kelly playing out of position but his confidence looks shot - at least Fryers can get forward and his defending certainly cant be worse than Kelly at the moment. Incidentally, why did we bother to play Fryers in the friendlies? He did okay and we are crying out for cover at that role - he must be seriously bad in training. Edited by Littlebogreek (02 Dec 2016 2.23pm) This is where AP lets himself down.He does not pick Fryers from the start.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Littlebogreek 02 Dec 16 4.11pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by matthau
What kind of issues?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
bigpapi34  La Crosse, Wisconsin 02 Dec 16 4.18pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Johnny Byrne
Let's see if Tomkins plays RB and Ward LB or 3-4-3 instead. Desperate times call for desperate measures. I would be more inclined to see a 4-1-4-1 formation with a defensive midfielder like Ledley and Flamini helping give cover to Fryers and Kelly.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| alaneagle1 Dunstable,Bedfordshire.England 02 Dec 16 4.58pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by bigpapi34
I would be more inclined to see a 4-1-4-1 formation with a defensive midfielder like Ledley and Flamini helping give cover to Fryers and Kelly. Do you mean Fryers OR Kelly we do not want both in the 11.?
Palace 13th 2017/18. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| bigpapi34 La Crosse, Wisconsin 02 Dec 16 5.11pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by alaneagle1
Do you mean Fryers OR Kelly we do not want both in the 11.? I would hope that Fryers starts, but the way Pardew is I know Kelly will start at LB. Basically what I was trying to say in the 4-1-4-1 formation is our defensive midfielder would give cover to whomever starts at LB in open play and can only help on set pieces.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hansy 02 Dec 16 5.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Could you imagine a 3-4-3? I think it could suit us really well. We need to win, I couldn't care less about a clean sheet, as long as we won. Hennessy Edited by Hansy (02 Dec 2016 5.39pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| dynamicdick Dormansland 02 Dec 16 5.45pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by victor43
Why? The defending in open play hasn't been that bad recently. Changing the system in response to conceding loads of set piece goals doesnt make a lot of sense to me. The players would take time to get used to that formation - would be a huge unnecessary risk Edited by victor43 (02 Dec 2016 12.47pm) That's what you have training sessions for which, given our performances must be alien to him.
Bring back Brolin |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.