This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 13 Aug 16 12.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Animals eat other animals every second of every day. They do not have morality. As much as I am appalled by human cruelty to animals, I accept that we are also animals and I do not see the consumption of meat as a "sin". It is part of the natural process. I am however, happy for people to choose what they eat on moral grounds, if it makes them feel better. I am also very much in support of improving conditions and treatment of farm animals. I think these days a lot more people buy organic and/or free range which should entail better treatment for animals and, frankly, tastes a lot nicer, yummmmmmmm.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
sitdownstandup 22 Aug 16 12.33am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Humanity Dick is the man behind the RSPCA. I believe it started with cruelty to donkeys in this area. Early to mid 19th Century. His townhouse is in Galway city next to the oldest pub in Galway - Naughtons.
Man is the most insane species. He worships an invisible God and destroys a visible Nature. Unaware that this Nature he’s destroying is this God he’s worshipping. Hubert Reeves |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
sitdownstandup 22 Aug 16 12.40am | |
---|---|
I posted this ages ago... if only more people thought like this kid... too much politics gets in the way of the food we eat... I talk to christians/ muslims about the treatment of animals but they are the most difficult groups to convince to think about treatment of animals strangely enough.
Man is the most insane species. He worships an invisible God and destroys a visible Nature. Unaware that this Nature he’s destroying is this God he’s worshipping. Hubert Reeves |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 22 Aug 16 1.29pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by sitdownstandup
I posted this ages ago... if only more people thought like this kid... too much politics gets in the way of the food we eat... I talk to christians/ muslims about the treatment of animals but they are the most difficult groups to convince to think about treatment of animals strangely enough. I know that the Koran is very big on cats, and camels, but especially cats. Mohammed and the Imams definitely seemed to be cat people. Christians tend Odd as it seems, there is a surprising amount on cruelty to animals (as well as humans) in the Koran. For example, cruel treatment of cats is a damnable offence, and that any food on a plate from which a cat has eaten is considered halal. Animals in general are to be respected within their function (its ok to use a camel as a stead, but beating it is a no-no).
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 22 Aug 16 1.34pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Animals eat other animals every second of every day. They do not have morality. As much as I am appalled by human cruelty to animals, I accept that we are also animals and I do not see the consumption of meat as a "sin". It is part of the natural process. I am however, happy for people to choose what they eat on moral grounds, if it makes them feel better. I am also very much in support of improving conditions and treatment of farm animals. I think its unethical to eat animals, but I do it - Which maybe serves as a good example of the difference between morals and ethics. I don't think there are really any philosophical arguments that defend eating meat, unless you have to (except maybe for Pigs who would be extinct without people eating them). Its certainly acceptable to eat animals, but realistically I would suggest that faced with a naked truth moment, of eating only vegetables and eating their pet cat/dog, people would likely turn to the carrots. I suspect we'd also be a lot less willing to eat animals if we had to raise them and slaughter them ourselves. Actually, probably not even the horror of the slaughter but the sheer amount of f**king effort involved would put most people off.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 22 Aug 16 1.36pm | |
---|---|
Animals don't have rights. They aren't capable of exercising them. Humans have controls over what they can or should do relating to animals.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 22 Aug 16 1.39pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
I think its unethical to eat animals, but I do it - Which maybe serves as a good example of the difference between morals and ethics. I don't think there are really any philosophical arguments that defend eating meat, unless you have to (except maybe for Pigs who would be extinct without people eating them). Its certainly acceptable to eat animals, but realistically I would suggest that faced with a naked truth moment, of eating only vegetables and eating their pet cat/dog, people would likely turn to the carrots. I suspect we'd also be a lot less willing to eat animals if we had to raise them and slaughter them ourselves. Actually, probably not even the horror of the slaughter but the sheer amount of f**king effort involved would put most people off. Farmers look after their animals well in the main. They also show them genuine affection. They then kill them or have them killed and eat them. What a farmer can do we all can do, it's just we aren't used to doing it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SurreyEagle16 Next Door 22 Aug 16 1.40pm | |
---|---|
One thing that always baffles me regarding animal rights is where individuals draw the line at what makes an "animal" and therefore deserves rights. It seems to me we as a species adopt this approach: Rare and fierce lion = goggle in awe, save them For the record, i eat meat and am not a huge lover of pets in general (never had any as a kid). But i never understand when i am shouted at for not buying free range chickens by someone wiping insect guts off their furniture.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 22 Aug 16 2.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Animals don't have rights. They aren't capable of exercising them. Humans have controls over what they can or should do relating to animals. I think that's the point of assigning legal rights, that those who have no power are protected from abuse of those who do.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 22 Aug 16 2.47pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
I think that's the point of assigning legal rights, that those who have no power are protected from abuse of those who do. Animals have no more legal rights than a shoe or a car.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 22 Aug 16 3.08pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Animals have no more legal rights than a shoe or a car. Actually they do, there are all manner of UK laws governing the treatment of animals. Cruelty to animals is a criminal offence, and a number of laws have existed since 1911 with regards to establishing the legal rights of animals, which were expanded in 2006. These definite requirements upon human owners for the treatment of animals. The maximum prison sentence under the Animal welfare act is 51 weeks and 20,000 fine. Whilst an animal is regarded as property in law, it has specific requirements in legislation to provide protection beyond that of non-sentient objects, even when testing and farming are concerned (causing undue suffering is a crime).
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 22 Aug 16 3.10pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SurreyEagle16
One thing that always baffles me regarding animal rights is where individuals draw the line at what makes an "animal" and therefore deserves rights. It seems to me we as a species adopt this approach: Rare and fierce lion = goggle in awe, save them For the record, i eat meat and am not a huge lover of pets in general (never had any as a kid). But i never understand when i am shouted at for not buying free range chickens by someone wiping insect guts off their furniture. I draw the line at wasps. Paradoxically, I'll go out of my way and put a lot of effort in removing a spider from the house, but happily eat cheap chicken. Although I do have cats, which means I've had to mercy kill some mice. Wasps are fair game though. F**k those c**ts. F**k them right up.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.