This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
TUX redhill 29 Nov 14 8.44pm | |
---|---|
Quote Jimenez at 29 Nov 2014 8.31pm
Quote TUX at 29 Nov 2014 7.45pm
Quote Jimenez at 29 Nov 2014 1.04am
Quote Seth at 29 Nov 2014 12.57am
So now you're frantically scouring the Mail Online looking for things to get outraged about. Wasn't Fox News bats*** crazy enough?
It was, thanks. Actually 'Bud' No Walmarts at all in NYC due to 'Unions" So where would you start and which 'other' company will you highlight?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Pawson Palace Croydon 30 Nov 14 11.07am | |
---|---|
Can someone actually tell me what poverty is defined as? As I understand it based on percentiles of the median income. Thus, some people with always be in poverty regardless of general economic performance. It is very misleading IMO. Just look at the Black Friday sales for goodness sake, with people up North who are supposed to be hit the hardest but have got money for bloody Blaupunkt TVs and discounted coffee machines. Some people have their priorities totally wrong.
Pride of South London |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 30 Nov 14 11.13am | |
---|---|
Quote Pawson Palace at 30 Nov 2014 11.07am
Can someone actually tell me what poverty is defined as? As I understand it based on percentiles of the median income. Thus, some people with always be in poverty regardless of general economic performance. It is very misleading IMO. Just look at the Black Friday sales for goodness sake, with people up North who are supposed to be hit the hardest but have got money for bloody Blaupunkt TVs and discounted coffee machines.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Pawson Palace Croydon 30 Nov 14 11.27am | |
---|---|
Quote Hoof Hearted at 30 Nov 2014 11.13am
Quote Pawson Palace at 30 Nov 2014 11.07am
Can someone actually tell me what poverty is defined as? As I understand it based on percentiles of the median income. Thus, some people with always be in poverty regardless of general economic performance. It is very misleading IMO. Just look at the Black Friday sales for goodness sake, with people up North who are supposed to be hit the hardest but have got money for bloody Blaupunkt TVs and discounted coffee machines.
I'm not questioning some people could be hard up...but really if hoards of people are out at midnight for discounted electrical tat and other non essentials you have to wonder about these claims some times.
Pride of South London |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
rob1969 Banstead Surrey 30 Nov 14 4.53pm | |
---|---|
Quote Pawson Palace at 30 Nov 2014 11.07am
Can someone actually tell me what poverty is defined as? As I understand it based on percentiles of the median income. Thus, some people with always be in poverty regardless of general economic performance. It is very misleading IMO. Just look at the Black Friday sales for goodness sake, with people up North who are supposed to be hit the hardest but have got money for bloody Blaupunkt TVs and discounted coffee machines. Some people have their priorities totally wrong. Used to be accepted that the average Northerner had more disposable income due to the higher cost of living Edited by rob1969 (30 Nov 2014 4.53pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 30 Nov 14 5.47pm | |
---|---|
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Bert the Head Epsom 30 Nov 14 9.30pm | |
---|---|
Quote Jimenez at 29 Nov 2014 12.20am
Well when unions were stronger the richest people were not just getting more and more while working people get less and less. These captains of industry keep going on about how we are in competition from (non-unionised) Asian countries. What they mean is that we should accept the standards of living of these countries while they get more and more of the profits. Besides you are quoting the Daily Mail (the other paper to run the story is the Telegraph) which is a very right wing paper and not known for its accuracy. It just might be giving you a bias take on the story (or in your case telling you what you really want to hear). ...there is another side to the story It says that Titan, is 20 times smaller than the [French tyre giant] Michelin … and 35 times less profitable.” I don't know if that is true but if it is it bucking the "lazy french" propaganda that is being put about by the right wing press, in the same way they put about the lazy English stuff when the minimum wage doesn't get people fighting for a job.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Seth On a pale blue dot 01 Dec 14 1.17am | |
---|---|
Anyone who disagrees with unions' rights to fight for their members (as is their role) should immediately give up the working rights they enjoy as a result of union action (paid holidays, sick pay, maternity pay etc). Maybe then they might realise the unions are a force for good and it's only the ruling elite and their spin doctors in the press who seek to turn working people against each other.
"You can feel the stadium jumping. The stadium is actually physically moving up and down" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 01 Dec 14 10.36am | |
---|---|
Quote Seth at 01 Dec 2014 1.17am
Anyone who disagrees with unions' rights to fight for their members (as is their role) should immediately give up the working rights they enjoy as a result of union action (paid holidays, sick pay, maternity pay etc). Maybe then they might realise the unions are a force for good and it's only the ruling elite and their spin doctors in the press who seek to turn working people against each other.
Your right Seth, I was in the wrong game mate!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
We are goin up! Coulsdon 01 Dec 14 11.52am | |
---|---|
Quote nickgusset at 29 Nov 2014 11.44am
Quote Pussay Patrol at 29 Nov 2014 10.54am
That's why our economy is thriving and Europe is in recession. Foreign companies want to come here and invest and that's why unemployment is low. We don't have these stringent employment laws which hinders business and gives power to Unions.
"Below the poverty line"... The measurement of poverty in this country is relative poverty which sort of means that because a lot of people have iPhones, if you only have a Nokia 3310, you are seen as being in poverty because you no longer are seen to be able to live in a way which is every day life for the majority in this country. With regard to food banks, I had friends at university who went to them, there were no checks and they bagged a few days' worth of free food. People like free things. Not saying everyone who goes to a food bank is in this situation but you get what I'm saying. The Trussell Trust say that 13 million people live in poverty in the UK, are you seriously suggesting that 20% of our population is in actual poverty? I find it hard to believe...
The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ghosteagle 01 Dec 14 2.16pm | |
---|---|
Quote Hoof Hearted at 01 Dec 2014 10.36am
Quote Seth at 01 Dec 2014 1.17am
Anyone who disagrees with unions' rights to fight for their members (as is their role) should immediately give up the working rights they enjoy as a result of union action (paid holidays, sick pay, maternity pay etc). Maybe then they might realise the unions are a force for good and it's only the ruling elite and their spin doctors in the press who seek to turn working people against each other.
Your right Seth, I was in the wrong game mate!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Pussay Patrol 01 Dec 14 2.46pm | |
---|---|
Quote ghosteagle at 01 Dec 2014 2.16pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 01 Dec 2014 10.36am
Quote Seth at 01 Dec 2014 1.17am
Anyone who disagrees with unions' rights to fight for their members (as is their role) should immediately give up the working rights they enjoy as a result of union action (paid holidays, sick pay, maternity pay etc). Maybe then they might realise the unions are a force for good and it's only the ruling elite and their spin doctors in the press who seek to turn working people against each other.
Your right Seth, I was in the wrong game mate!
Yeah right, employers offer good salary, bonus, pension package because they are being forced to by a Union? Or perhaps market forces getting the right person for the job determine this?
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.