You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Pulis set to fine Thomas and Chamakh
November 26 2024 11.25am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Pulis set to fine Thomas and Chamakh

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 2 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

  

bubble wrap Flag Carparks in South East London 02 Mar 14 8.52pm

Quote samprior at 02 Mar 2014 8.45pm

Quote ItsCPFCforme at 02 Mar 2014 8.26pm

I read the BBC news thread and I felt that they had misconstrued what Pulis said. He said he was fining Thomas and said something like 'Cham has had one too'. I thought he meant that Chamakh had been fined earlier in the season for it, and Pulis was simply illustrating how he doesn't tolerate it at the club (citing precedent as it were).

But then again I may be wrong

[Link]

Definitely both getting fined. Seems strange as I don't remember seeing Chamakh diving at any point!

Perhaps he dived in the bath before TP got in, Tony always darts down the tunnel to be first in the bath/showers.

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
wwarr009 Flag 02 Mar 14 8.55pm

Quote bubble wrap at 02 Mar 2014 8.52pm

Quote samprior at 02 Mar 2014 8.45pm

Quote ItsCPFCforme at 02 Mar 2014 8.26pm

I read the BBC news thread and I felt that they had misconstrued what Pulis said. He said he was fining Thomas and said something like 'Cham has had one too'. I thought he meant that Chamakh had been fined earlier in the season for it, and Pulis was simply illustrating how he doesn't tolerate it at the club (citing precedent as it were).

But then again I may be wrong

[Link]

Definitely both getting fined. Seems strange as I don't remember seeing Chamakh diving at any point!

Perhaps he dived in the bath before TP got in, Tony always darts down the tunnel to be first in the bath/showers.

Think that just gets a headbutt mate


 

Beans beans there good for your heart, the more you eat the more you fart, the more you fart the more you eat the more you sit on the toilet seat
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
samprior Flag Hamburg 02 Mar 14 8.56pm Send a Private Message to samprior Add samprior as a friend

Quote bubble wrap at 02 Mar 2014 8.52pm

Quote samprior at 02 Mar 2014 8.45pm

Quote ItsCPFCforme at 02 Mar 2014 8.26pm

I read the BBC news thread and I felt that they had misconstrued what Pulis said. He said he was fining Thomas and said something like 'Cham has had one too'. I thought he meant that Chamakh had been fined earlier in the season for it, and Pulis was simply illustrating how he doesn't tolerate it at the club (citing precedent as it were).

But then again I may be wrong

[Link]

Definitely both getting fined. Seems strange as I don't remember seeing Chamakh diving at any point!

Perhaps he dived in the bath before TP got in, Tony always darts down the tunnel to be first in the bath/showers.

I'm sure TP would have only dished out a naked headbutt for that!

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Dangermouse Flag Hastings 02 Mar 14 8.57pm Send a Private Message to Dangermouse Add Dangermouse as a friend

Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 8.22pm

Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 7.31pm

Needs an excuse to drive out Chamakh, he really isn't a Pulis type of player. Didn't see Chamakh dive.


Surely you're on a wind up?

He must be one of the only players that Pulis has consistently started since he took over.


No wind up. He is not a Pulis type player, everyone knows it, but he needs him for now. He criticised him for giving the ball away a lot, apparently, against Manure, when everyone else felt he was one of our best players bar that one tackle. Didn't single anyone else out and now announces he's fining him for a dive against Manure a week after the event when no one knows what incident he is talking about. No other manager bar Di Canio has taken any sort of public stance against his players and I would have no problem if he kept it in house.
Just the cynic in me, but I feel this is the start of the build up that will lead to him leaving and us ending up with someone like Crouch next season. If I'm wrong then I'll be happy.
Just watched weed vs Palace playoff again tonight so I might lighten up a bit later.

Edited by Dangermouse (02 Mar 2014 8.59pm)

 

That's Life
And as funny as it may seem
Some people get their kicks stompin' on a Dream.
KEEP THE FAITH!!!!!
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 02 Mar 14 9.02pm Send a Private Message to EverybodyDannsNow Add EverybodyDannsNow as a friend

Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 8.57pm

Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 8.22pm

Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 7.31pm

Needs an excuse to drive out Chamakh, he really isn't a Pulis type of player. Didn't see Chamakh dive.


Surely you're on a wind up?

He must be one of the only players that Pulis has consistently started since he took over.


No wind up. He is not a Pulis type player, everyone knows it, but he needs him for now. He criticised him for giving the ball away a lot, apparently, against Manure, when everyone else felt he was one of our best players bar that one tackle. Didn't single anyone else out and now announces he's fining him for a dive against Manure a week after the event when no one knows what incident he is talking about. No other manager bar Di Canio has taken any sort of public stance against his players and I would have no problem if he kept it in house.
Just the cynic in me, but I feel this is the start of the build up that will lead to him leaving and us ending up with someone like Crouch next season. If I'm wrong then I'll be happy.
Just watched weed vs Palace playoff again tonight so I might lighten up a bit later.

Edited by Dangermouse (02 Mar 2014 8.59pm)

No, he accused him of diving today in the first half, no mention of the United game.

How exactly is he not a Pulis type player? Furthermore, what is a Pulis type player? It just seems to be a phrase thrown around when someone doesn't get picked (see Moxey, Gayle, Bannan).

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Palace_denizen Flag filed under " time wasters " 02 Mar 14 9.06pm

well done Pulis, showing turd managers in the Prem just how a little class goes a long way.

 

Laughing at Charlton - Every London Clyub's fourth or fifth most hated team -
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Dangermouse Flag Hastings 02 Mar 14 9.10pm Send a Private Message to Dangermouse Add Dangermouse as a friend

Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 9.02pm

Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 8.57pm

Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 8.22pm

Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 7.31pm

Needs an excuse to drive out Chamakh, he really isn't a Pulis type of player. Didn't see Chamakh dive.


Surely you're on a wind up?

He must be one of the only players that Pulis has consistently started since he took over.


No wind up. He is not a Pulis type player, everyone knows it, but he needs him for now. He criticised him for giving the ball away a lot, apparently, against Manure, when everyone else felt he was one of our best players bar that one tackle. Didn't single anyone else out and now announces he's fining him for a dive against Manure a week after the event when no one knows what incident he is talking about. No other manager bar Di Canio has taken any sort of public stance against his players and I would have no problem if he kept it in house.
Just the cynic in me, but I feel this is the start of the build up that will lead to him leaving and us ending up with someone like Crouch next season. If I'm wrong then I'll be happy.
Just watched weed vs Palace playoff again tonight so I might lighten up a bit later.

Edited by Dangermouse (02 Mar 2014 8.59pm)

No, he accused him of diving today in the first half, no mention of the United game.

How exactly is he not a Pulis type player? Furthermore, what is a Pulis type player? It just seems to be a phrase thrown around when someone doesn't get picked (see Moxey, Gayle, Bannan).

Skillful thinking footballers. He likes his players to be workmanlike and able to follow instructions to the letter. He doesn't give them any freedom to express themselves and I base this on many years of watching the type of teams and football he produces.
Would you call KG a Brendan Rogers type of player or Jedi a Wenger type? If Pulis was starting with a clean sheet do you honestly think he would pick a player like Chamakh?

 

That's Life
And as funny as it may seem
Some people get their kicks stompin' on a Dream.
KEEP THE FAITH!!!!!
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Icepick Tony Flag Chester 02 Mar 14 9.11pm Send a Private Message to Icepick Tony Add Icepick Tony as a friend

Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 9.02pm

Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 8.57pm

Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 8.22pm

Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 7.31pm

Needs an excuse to drive out Chamakh, he really isn't a Pulis type of player. Didn't see Chamakh dive.


Surely you're on a wind up?

He must be one of the only players that Pulis has consistently started since he took over.


No wind up. He is not a Pulis type player, everyone knows it, but he needs him for now. He criticised him for giving the ball away a lot, apparently, against Manure, when everyone else felt he was one of our best players bar that one tackle. Didn't single anyone else out and now announces he's fining him for a dive against Manure a week after the event when no one knows what incident he is talking about. No other manager bar Di Canio has taken any sort of public stance against his players and I would have no problem if he kept it in house.
Just the cynic in me, but I feel this is the start of the build up that will lead to him leaving and us ending up with someone like Crouch next season. If I'm wrong then I'll be happy.
Just watched weed vs Palace playoff again tonight so I might lighten up a bit later.

Edited by Dangermouse (02 Mar 2014 8.59pm)

No, he accused him of diving today in the first half, no mention of the United game.

How exactly is he not a Pulis type player? Furthermore, what is a Pulis type player? It just seems to be a phrase thrown around when someone doesn't get picked (see Moxey, Gayle, Bannan).

Dangermouse just doesn't like Pulis, that is the end of it.

 

"They got his own song 'He's just too good for you', it's quite unbelievable but when you see it and he's facing up someone - I actually feel sorry for them, 'Cos he actually is" - Ian Holloway
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
TomThePalaceFanatic Flag 02 Mar 14 9.12pm Send a Private Message to TomThePalaceFanatic Add TomThePalaceFanatic as a friend

Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 9.10pm

Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 9.02pm

Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 8.57pm

Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 8.22pm

Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 7.31pm

Needs an excuse to drive out Chamakh, he really isn't a Pulis type of player. Didn't see Chamakh dive.


Surely you're on a wind up?

He must be one of the only players that Pulis has consistently started since he took over.


No wind up. He is not a Pulis type player, everyone knows it, but he needs him for now. He criticised him for giving the ball away a lot, apparently, against Manure, when everyone else felt he was one of our best players bar that one tackle. Didn't single anyone else out and now announces he's fining him for a dive against Manure a week after the event when no one knows what incident he is talking about. No other manager bar Di Canio has taken any sort of public stance against his players and I would have no problem if he kept it in house.
Just the cynic in me, but I feel this is the start of the build up that will lead to him leaving and us ending up with someone like Crouch next season. If I'm wrong then I'll be happy.
Just watched weed vs Palace playoff again tonight so I might lighten up a bit later.

Edited by Dangermouse (02 Mar 2014 8.59pm)

No, he accused him of diving today in the first half, no mention of the United game.

How exactly is he not a Pulis type player? Furthermore, what is a Pulis type player? It just seems to be a phrase thrown around when someone doesn't get picked (see Moxey, Gayle, Bannan).

Skillful thinking footballers. He likes his players to be workmanlike and able to follow instructions to the letter. He doesn't give them any freedom to express themselves and I base this on many years of watching the type of teams and football he produces.
Would you call KG a Brendan Rogers type of player or Jedi a Wenger type? If Pulis was starting with a clean sheet do you honestly think he would pick a player like Chamakh?


Chamakh works unbelievably hard

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
FinchleyEagle Flag 02 Mar 14 9.15pm Send a Private Message to FinchleyEagle Add FinchleyEagle as a friend

Quote TomThePalaceFanatic at 02 Mar 2014 9.12pm

Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 9.10pm

Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 9.02pm

Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 8.57pm

Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 8.22pm

Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 7.31pm

Needs an excuse to drive out Chamakh, he really isn't a Pulis type of player. Didn't see Chamakh dive.


Surely you're on a wind up?

He must be one of the only players that Pulis has consistently started since he took over.


No wind up. He is not a Pulis type player, everyone knows it, but he needs him for now. He criticised him for giving the ball away a lot, apparently, against Manure, when everyone else felt he was one of our best players bar that one tackle. Didn't single anyone else out and now announces he's fining him for a dive against Manure a week after the event when no one knows what incident he is talking about. No other manager bar Di Canio has taken any sort of public stance against his players and I would have no problem if he kept it in house.
Just the cynic in me, but I feel this is the start of the build up that will lead to him leaving and us ending up with someone like Crouch next season. If I'm wrong then I'll be happy.
Just watched weed vs Palace playoff again tonight so I might lighten up a bit later.

Edited by Dangermouse (02 Mar 2014 8.59pm)

No, he accused him of diving today in the first half, no mention of the United game.

How exactly is he not a Pulis type player? Furthermore, what is a Pulis type player? It just seems to be a phrase thrown around when someone doesn't get picked (see Moxey, Gayle, Bannan).

Skillful thinking footballers. He likes his players to be workmanlike and able to follow instructions to the letter. He doesn't give them any freedom to express themselves and I base this on many years of watching the type of teams and football he produces.
Would you call KG a Brendan Rogers type of player or Jedi a Wenger type? If Pulis was starting with a clean sheet do you honestly think he would pick a player like Chamakh?


Chamakh works unbelievably hard

He certainly does. Good on Pulis. Hate getting points this way, there's no justification for doing it in my book. Remember Williams did the same at a home game v Bristol City in the last few mins when it was 0-0. We got the points but it left a bitter taste.

 

You'll be forever in my family's memories and it was an honor and privilege to play and lead in the red and blue
Yours sincerely
Mile Jedinak

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 02 Mar 14 9.17pm Send a Private Message to EverybodyDannsNow Add EverybodyDannsNow as a friend

Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 9.10pm

Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 9.02pm

Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 8.57pm

Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 8.22pm

Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 7.31pm

Needs an excuse to drive out Chamakh, he really isn't a Pulis type of player. Didn't see Chamakh dive.


Surely you're on a wind up?

He must be one of the only players that Pulis has consistently started since he took over.


No wind up. He is not a Pulis type player, everyone knows it, but he needs him for now. He criticised him for giving the ball away a lot, apparently, against Manure, when everyone else felt he was one of our best players bar that one tackle. Didn't single anyone else out and now announces he's fining him for a dive against Manure a week after the event when no one knows what incident he is talking about. No other manager bar Di Canio has taken any sort of public stance against his players and I would have no problem if he kept it in house.
Just the cynic in me, but I feel this is the start of the build up that will lead to him leaving and us ending up with someone like Crouch next season. If I'm wrong then I'll be happy.
Just watched weed vs Palace playoff again tonight so I might lighten up a bit later.

Edited by Dangermouse (02 Mar 2014 8.59pm)

No, he accused him of diving today in the first half, no mention of the United game.

How exactly is he not a Pulis type player? Furthermore, what is a Pulis type player? It just seems to be a phrase thrown around when someone doesn't get picked (see Moxey, Gayle, Bannan).

Skillful thinking footballers. He likes his players to be workmanlike and able to follow instructions to the letter. He doesn't give them any freedom to express themselves and I base this on many years of watching the type of teams and football he produces.
Would you call KG a Brendan Rogers type of player or Jedi a Wenger type? If Pulis was starting with a clean sheet do you honestly think he would pick a player like Chamakh?


Ask Yannick Bolasie if he was given freedom to express himself today.

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Dangermouse Flag Hastings 02 Mar 14 9.18pm Send a Private Message to Dangermouse Add Dangermouse as a friend

Quote Icepick Tony at 02 Mar 2014 9.11pm

Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 9.02pm

Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 8.57pm

Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 8.22pm

Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 7.31pm

Needs an excuse to drive out Chamakh, he really isn't a Pulis type of player. Didn't see Chamakh dive.


Surely you're on a wind up?

He must be one of the only players that Pulis has consistently started since he took over.


No wind up. He is not a Pulis type player, everyone knows it, but he needs him for now. He criticised him for giving the ball away a lot, apparently, against Manure, when everyone else felt he was one of our best players bar that one tackle. Didn't single anyone else out and now announces he's fining him for a dive against Manure a week after the event when no one knows what incident he is talking about. No other manager bar Di Canio has taken any sort of public stance against his players and I would have no problem if he kept it in house.
Just the cynic in me, but I feel this is the start of the build up that will lead to him leaving and us ending up with someone like Crouch next season. If I'm wrong then I'll be happy.
Just watched weed vs Palace playoff again tonight so I might lighten up a bit later.

Edited by Dangermouse (02 Mar 2014 8.59pm)

No, he accused him of diving today in the first half, no mention of the United game.

How exactly is he not a Pulis type player? Furthermore, what is a Pulis type player? It just seems to be a phrase thrown around when someone doesn't get picked (see Moxey, Gayle, Bannan).

Dangermouse just doesn't like Pulis, that is the end of it.

Can't deny that.
I saw our most successful ever spell under our Lord God Steve Coppell, but by the time he left I was totally hating long ball, percentage, aggressive football with a passion. In the early days with a poor defence, but Wright and Bright up front it was fun with 4-4 and 5-4 scorelines, but by the end you want to see some football being played. Ironically when SC left he changed his football philosophy and started playing more on the ground.
I honestly cannot abide to watch the type of s***e TP had them playing first half today and it actually made me angry. I'm not asking for total football or trying to outpass Arsenal, but some form of offence and players passing to each other not into large patches of vacant grass.
Sorry if that upsets some, but...........

 

That's Life
And as funny as it may seem
Some people get their kicks stompin' on a Dream.
KEEP THE FAITH!!!!!
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 2 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Pulis set to fine Thomas and Chamakh