This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Where will the goals come from ?
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 kennys boots 79  Keston 01 Feb 14 10.20pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Quote Gyro1780 at 01 Feb 2014 9.12pm
Quote maxipalace at 01 Feb 2014 8.42pm
dwight gayle This. Would love to see Gayle play upfront with Chamakh. I'm sure he'd get us goals if given the chance & played in his correct position.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| FinchleyEagle 01 Feb 14 10.51pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote NickinOX at 01 Feb 2014 7.07pm
Quote FinchleyEagle at 01 Feb 2014 6.54pm
Hmmm, not sure goals in Scotland count for much and Ince hasn't played in the Prem. Don't get me wrong not trying to bring a downer here, but I thought the one thing we needed in the window was a good striker, maybe like Jordan Rhodes but there wasn't even any chat about him which was strange I thought. So we'll improve, have a bit more depth and maybe a bit more of a threat - but we still don't have a proven premier league striker. Are my expectations too high ? I wonder if we tried to get anyone like that but couldn't make it happen... You call for a proven premier league striker, yet argue we should have gone for someone like Jordan Rhodes. Additionally, you discount Ince for not having played in the premier league: neither has Rhodes. Your logic makes no sense. There are a number of teams looking for a proven premier league striker: most have not found one. At least they have not found one who is even remotely reasonable value given the 7 million paid for a 1 in 4 strike rate by Hull.
Yeah fair point fella, didn't make too much sense did it !! I just meant a striker would have been nice and I do actually have this belief borne of no evidence whatsoever that Rhodes would bang them in...
You'll be forever in my family's memories and it was an honor and privilege to play and lead in the red and blue |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
NickinOX  Sailing country. 02 Feb 14 1.30am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote FinchleyEagle at 01 Feb 2014 10.51pm
Quote NickinOX at 01 Feb 2014 7.07pm
Quote FinchleyEagle at 01 Feb 2014 6.54pm
Hmmm, not sure goals in Scotland count for much and Ince hasn't played in the Prem. Don't get me wrong not trying to bring a downer here, but I thought the one thing we needed in the window was a good striker, maybe like Jordan Rhodes but there wasn't even any chat about him which was strange I thought. So we'll improve, have a bit more depth and maybe a bit more of a threat - but we still don't have a proven premier league striker. Are my expectations too high ? I wonder if we tried to get anyone like that but couldn't make it happen... You call for a proven premier league striker, yet argue we should have gone for someone like Jordan Rhodes. Additionally, you discount Ince for not having played in the premier league: neither has Rhodes. Your logic makes no sense. There are a number of teams looking for a proven premier league striker: most have not found one. At least they have not found one who is even remotely reasonable value given the 7 million paid for a 1 in 4 strike rate by Hull.
Yeah fair point fella, didn't make too much sense did it !! I just meant a striker would have been nice and I do actually have this belief borne of no evidence whatsoever that Rhodes would bang them in... Use a sarcastic smiley all you want, but it doesn't hide the fact that your comments were illogical. And you're right, it didn't make sense. After all, you're the one who downplayed experience from outside the Premier League. Then you said you wanted us to bid for someone who's not proven there. There's also no evidence Rhodes would bang them in in the premier league as you imply. What you cite is evidence that he can bang them in in the championship. Not the same thing, is it!
If you come to a fork in the road, take it. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| FinchleyEagle 02 Feb 14 1.16pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote NickinOX at 02 Feb 2014 1.30am
Quote FinchleyEagle at 01 Feb 2014 10.51pm
Quote NickinOX at 01 Feb 2014 7.07pm
Quote FinchleyEagle at 01 Feb 2014 6.54pm
Hmmm, not sure goals in Scotland count for much and Ince hasn't played in the Prem. Don't get me wrong not trying to bring a downer here, but I thought the one thing we needed in the window was a good striker, maybe like Jordan Rhodes but there wasn't even any chat about him which was strange I thought. So we'll improve, have a bit more depth and maybe a bit more of a threat - but we still don't have a proven premier league striker. Are my expectations too high ? I wonder if we tried to get anyone like that but couldn't make it happen... You call for a proven premier league striker, yet argue we should have gone for someone like Jordan Rhodes. Additionally, you discount Ince for not having played in the premier league: neither has Rhodes. Your logic makes no sense. There are a number of teams looking for a proven premier league striker: most have not found one. At least they have not found one who is even remotely reasonable value given the 7 million paid for a 1 in 4 strike rate by Hull.
Yeah fair point fella, didn't make too much sense did it !! I just meant a striker would have been nice and I do actually have this belief borne of no evidence whatsoever that Rhodes would bang them in... Use a sarcastic smiley all you want, but it doesn't hide the fact that your comments were illogical. And you're right, it didn't make sense. After all, you're the one who downplayed experience from outside the Premier League. Then you said you wanted us to bid for someone who's not proven there. There's also no evidence Rhodes would bang them in in the premier league as you imply. What you cite is evidence that he can bang them in in the championship. Not the same thing, is it! Erm, I think you should maybe read my last post a bit more carefully fella...
You'll be forever in my family's memories and it was an honor and privilege to play and lead in the red and blue |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 02 Feb 14 1.44pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Midfield most likely. Won't be the first time we've been reliant on midfield goal scorers.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| NickinOX Sailing country. 02 Feb 14 3.32pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote FinchleyEagle at 02 Feb 2014 1.16pm
Quote NickinOX at 02 Feb 2014 1.30am
Quote FinchleyEagle at 01 Feb 2014 10.51pm
Quote NickinOX at 01 Feb 2014 7.07pm
Quote FinchleyEagle at 01 Feb 2014 6.54pm
Hmmm, not sure goals in Scotland count for much and Ince hasn't played in the Prem. Don't get me wrong not trying to bring a downer here, but I thought the one thing we needed in the window was a good striker, maybe like Jordan Rhodes but there wasn't even any chat about him which was strange I thought. So we'll improve, have a bit more depth and maybe a bit more of a threat - but we still don't have a proven premier league striker. Are my expectations too high ? I wonder if we tried to get anyone like that but couldn't make it happen... You call for a proven premier league striker, yet argue we should have gone for someone like Jordan Rhodes. Additionally, you discount Ince for not having played in the premier league: neither has Rhodes. Your logic makes no sense. There are a number of teams looking for a proven premier league striker: most have not found one. At least they have not found one who is even remotely reasonable value given the 7 million paid for a 1 in 4 strike rate by Hull.
Yeah fair point fella, didn't make too much sense did it !! I just meant a striker would have been nice and I do actually have this belief borne of no evidence whatsoever that Rhodes would bang them in... Use a sarcastic smiley all you want, but it doesn't hide the fact that your comments were illogical. And you're right, it didn't make sense. After all, you're the one who downplayed experience from outside the Premier League. Then you said you wanted us to bid for someone who's not proven there. There's also no evidence Rhodes would bang them in in the premier league as you imply. What you cite is evidence that he can bang them in in the championship. Not the same thing, is it! Erm, I think you should maybe read my last post a bit more carefully fella... Or what?
If you come to a fork in the road, take it. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| moylerg Cofton Hackett, Worcestershire 02 Feb 14 3.35pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote NickinOX at 02 Feb 2014 3.32pm
Quote FinchleyEagle at 02 Feb 2014 1.16pm
Quote NickinOX at 02 Feb 2014 1.30am
Quote FinchleyEagle at 01 Feb 2014 10.51pm
Quote NickinOX at 01 Feb 2014 7.07pm
Quote FinchleyEagle at 01 Feb 2014 6.54pm
Hmmm, not sure goals in Scotland count for much and Ince hasn't played in the Prem. Don't get me wrong not trying to bring a downer here, but I thought the one thing we needed in the window was a good striker, maybe like Jordan Rhodes but there wasn't even any chat about him which was strange I thought. So we'll improve, have a bit more depth and maybe a bit more of a threat - but we still don't have a proven premier league striker. Are my expectations too high ? I wonder if we tried to get anyone like that but couldn't make it happen... You call for a proven premier league striker, yet argue we should have gone for someone like Jordan Rhodes. Additionally, you discount Ince for not having played in the premier league: neither has Rhodes. Your logic makes no sense. There are a number of teams looking for a proven premier league striker: most have not found one. At least they have not found one who is even remotely reasonable value given the 7 million paid for a 1 in 4 strike rate by Hull.
Yeah fair point fella, didn't make too much sense did it !! I just meant a striker would have been nice and I do actually have this belief borne of no evidence whatsoever that Rhodes would bang them in... Use a sarcastic smiley all you want, but it doesn't hide the fact that your comments were illogical. And you're right, it didn't make sense. After all, you're the one who downplayed experience from outside the Premier League. Then you said you wanted us to bid for someone who's not proven there. There's also no evidence Rhodes would bang them in in the premier league as you imply. What you cite is evidence that he can bang them in in the championship. Not the same thing, is it! Erm, I think you should maybe read my last post a bit more carefully fella... Or what? My word, that escalated quickly!
Most certainly not European. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| NickinOX Sailing country. 02 Feb 14 3.37pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote moylerg at 02 Feb 2014 3.35pm
Quote NickinOX at 02 Feb 2014 3.32pm
Quote FinchleyEagle at 02 Feb 2014 1.16pm
Quote NickinOX at 02 Feb 2014 1.30am
Quote FinchleyEagle at 01 Feb 2014 10.51pm
Quote NickinOX at 01 Feb 2014 7.07pm
Quote FinchleyEagle at 01 Feb 2014 6.54pm
Hmmm, not sure goals in Scotland count for much and Ince hasn't played in the Prem. Don't get me wrong not trying to bring a downer here, but I thought the one thing we needed in the window was a good striker, maybe like Jordan Rhodes but there wasn't even any chat about him which was strange I thought. So we'll improve, have a bit more depth and maybe a bit more of a threat - but we still don't have a proven premier league striker. Are my expectations too high ? I wonder if we tried to get anyone like that but couldn't make it happen... You call for a proven premier league striker, yet argue we should have gone for someone like Jordan Rhodes. Additionally, you discount Ince for not having played in the premier league: neither has Rhodes. Your logic makes no sense. There are a number of teams looking for a proven premier league striker: most have not found one. At least they have not found one who is even remotely reasonable value given the 7 million paid for a 1 in 4 strike rate by Hull.
Yeah fair point fella, didn't make too much sense did it !! I just meant a striker would have been nice and I do actually have this belief borne of no evidence whatsoever that Rhodes would bang them in... Use a sarcastic smiley all you want, but it doesn't hide the fact that your comments were illogical. And you're right, it didn't make sense. After all, you're the one who downplayed experience from outside the Premier League. Then you said you wanted us to bid for someone who's not proven there. There's also no evidence Rhodes would bang them in in the premier league as you imply. What you cite is evidence that he can bang them in in the championship. Not the same thing, is it! Erm, I think you should maybe read my last post a bit more carefully fella... Or what? My word, that escalated quickly!
Edited by NickinOX (02 Feb 2014 3.47pm)
If you come to a fork in the road, take it. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| cornwalls palace Torpoint 02 Feb 14 3.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote NickinOX at 02 Feb 2014 3.32pm
Quote FinchleyEagle at 02 Feb 2014 1.16pm
Quote NickinOX at 02 Feb 2014 1.30am
Quote FinchleyEagle at 01 Feb 2014 10.51pm
Quote NickinOX at 01 Feb 2014 7.07pm
Quote FinchleyEagle at 01 Feb 2014 6.54pm
Hmmm, not sure goals in Scotland count for much and Ince hasn't played in the Prem. Don't get me wrong not trying to bring a downer here, but I thought the one thing we needed in the window was a good striker, maybe like Jordan Rhodes but there wasn't even any chat about him which was strange I thought. So we'll improve, have a bit more depth and maybe a bit more of a threat - but we still don't have a proven premier league striker. Are my expectations too high ? I wonder if we tried to get anyone like that but couldn't make it happen... You call for a proven premier league striker, yet argue we should have gone for someone like Jordan Rhodes. Additionally, you discount Ince for not having played in the premier league: neither has Rhodes. Your logic makes no sense. There are a number of teams looking for a proven premier league striker: most have not found one. At least they have not found one who is even remotely reasonable value given the 7 million paid for a 1 in 4 strike rate by Hull.
Yeah fair point fella, didn't make too much sense did it !! I just meant a striker would have been nice and I do actually have this belief borne of no evidence whatsoever that Rhodes would bang them in... Use a sarcastic smiley all you want, but it doesn't hide the fact that your comments were illogical. And you're right, it didn't make sense. After all, you're the one who downplayed experience from outside the Premier League. Then you said you wanted us to bid for someone who's not proven there. There's also no evidence Rhodes would bang them in in the premier league as you imply. What you cite is evidence that he can bang them in in the championship. Not the same thing, is it! Erm, I think you should maybe read my last post a bit more carefully fella... Or what?
.......has our coach driver done a Poo'yet, without thinking about Gus! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| FinchleyEagle 03 Feb 14 3.42pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote NickinOX at 02 Feb 2014 3.37pm
Quote moylerg at 02 Feb 2014 3.35pm
Quote NickinOX at 02 Feb 2014 3.32pm
Quote FinchleyEagle at 02 Feb 2014 1.16pm
Quote NickinOX at 02 Feb 2014 1.30am
Quote FinchleyEagle at 01 Feb 2014 10.51pm
Quote NickinOX at 01 Feb 2014 7.07pm
Quote FinchleyEagle at 01 Feb 2014 6.54pm
Hmmm, not sure goals in Scotland count for much and Ince hasn't played in the Prem. Don't get me wrong not trying to bring a downer here, but I thought the one thing we needed in the window was a good striker, maybe like Jordan Rhodes but there wasn't even any chat about him which was strange I thought. So we'll improve, have a bit more depth and maybe a bit more of a threat - but we still don't have a proven premier league striker. Are my expectations too high ? I wonder if we tried to get anyone like that but couldn't make it happen... You call for a proven premier league striker, yet argue we should have gone for someone like Jordan Rhodes. Additionally, you discount Ince for not having played in the premier league: neither has Rhodes. Your logic makes no sense. There are a number of teams looking for a proven premier league striker: most have not found one. At least they have not found one who is even remotely reasonable value given the 7 million paid for a 1 in 4 strike rate by Hull.
Yeah fair point fella, didn't make too much sense did it !! I just meant a striker would have been nice and I do actually have this belief borne of no evidence whatsoever that Rhodes would bang them in... Use a sarcastic smiley all you want, but it doesn't hide the fact that your comments were illogical. And you're right, it didn't make sense. After all, you're the one who downplayed experience from outside the Premier League. Then you said you wanted us to bid for someone who's not proven there. There's also no evidence Rhodes would bang them in in the premier league as you imply. What you cite is evidence that he can bang them in in the championship. Not the same thing, is it! Erm, I think you should maybe read my last post a bit more carefully fella... Or what? My word, that escalated quickly!
Edited by NickinOX (02 Feb 2014 3.47pm) Oh my this IS exciting. A genuine GENUINE keyboard warrior is being all aggressive at me ! From 6000 miles away ! Brilliant ! So tell me NickinOX I presume you are an exiled englishman otherwise why would you support Palace ? But that does seem strange that you feel 'threatened'. However if you are American and really have no grasp of irony or sarcasm (as the stereotype goes) then that makes it more understandable. I could just tell you to jog on, ignore your frankly insanely aggressive posts, or (my preferred option) explain where you have gone wrong in a really rather patronising way. So here goes (presuming youve read this far if you're foaming at the mouth hasnt got the better of you)... I began this little interchange by saying a proven premier league striker is what we wanted and suggested Jordan Rhodes. You pointed out my logic made no sense. Which it didnt. I agreed with you and said I just believed Rhodes would bang them in, and in what I considered to be a jocular moment of self deprecation, added that this was 'borne of no evidence whatsoever' and raised an eyebrow at myself for a) making no sense and b) further having an opinion based on no evidence. After all its not like Im a religious man. You (rather bizarrely I thought) continued to make the same point I'd already agreed with, in a somewhat confrontational manner. To which I thought that you must have mis-read what I said and suggested you should maybe read it a bit more carefully. At which point, no doubt with steam coming out of your ears and shouting at the computer, you replied with the extremely surprising 'or what ?' which I havent actually replied to. So allow me to answer that.. 'or you wont understand the conversation properly' And then you think you have been threatened although I cant for the life of me see where... but dont worry Nick, just because you're paranoid doesnt mean they're NOT all out to get you. Maybe a few less coffees / prescription drugs / alcohol / skunk might help you to calm down a bit... Lots of love, FinchleyEagle Edited by FinchleyEagle (03 Feb 2014 3.45pm)
You'll be forever in my family's memories and it was an honor and privilege to play and lead in the red and blue |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
The Sash  Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 03 Feb 14 3.50pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Getting back on point...dont know is the answer and the only downer for me was the lack of a forward in the window so I am hoping Glenn Murray is a lot further down the line for fitness than we know. Obviously unproven at this level but to be fair he has been unproven at each level he has moved up into and passed with flying colours each time. If Lambert, Lallana, Rodriguez et al have adjusted then so can GM - he canm finish which puts him a few rungs up the ladder from Jerome Being out so long with such a serious injury does worry me as it will take him time to atune again to football, let alone the rarified atmosphere of the 'best league in the world' (copyright Sky) Heres hoping he comes through unscathed tonights run out and comes on for the last ten against the BAggies this weekend and nets a couple in our 5-0 win
As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014 |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Seth  On a pale blue dot 03 Feb 14 4.05pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote The Sash at 03 Feb 2014 3.50pm
Getting back on point...dont know is the answer and the only downer for me was the lack of a forward in the window so I am hoping Glenn Murray is a lot further down the line for fitness than we know. Obviously unproven at this level but to be fair he has been unproven at each level he has moved up into and passed with flying colours each time. If Lambert, Lallana, Rodriguez et al have adjusted then so can GM - he canm finish which puts him a few rungs up the ladder from Jerome Being out so long with such a serious injury does worry me as it will take him time to atune again to football, let alone the rarified atmosphere of the 'best league in the world' (copyright Sky) Heres hoping he comes through unscathed tonights run out and comes on for the last ten against the BAggies this weekend and nets a couple in our 5-0 win
NickinOx - you misunderstood FE's post. He was agreeing with you that his OP was somewhat illogical in a self-depreciating way, not being confrontational as you appear to have inferred.
"You can feel the stadium jumping. The stadium is actually physically moving up and down" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.