This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
npn Crowborough 17 May 13 8.44am | |
---|---|
I score it 60:40 in favour of Watford, but could just as easily be 0-0, or 4-0 either way I could be a pundit, me! I've had a bet on Watford winning, and on Watford going through (just to be on the safe side)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Chelmsfordeagle Chelmsford 17 May 13 9.06am | |
---|---|
With Watford playing 3 at the back I would like to see Palace start with 2 upfront like we did against Hull and that worked in our favour. Tempted to put Zaha upfront with Wilbs and keep KP in reserve if we need a goal late on. Or we could play 4-3-3 with Wilf and Yannick playing as inside forwards, we can't keep Wilbs isolated on his own as this will in affect give Watford 2 spare players at the back. Agree with Danny H that the midfield is key but can't make my mind up on who should start out of Joniesta, Garvs or Moritz.
Fancies another pint of Essex Blonde!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
herefordeagle Hereford 17 May 13 9.46am | |
---|---|
I don't think Holloway was saying it to have a go at Watford as a club but saying it to bring to the publics attention what a stupid rule it is and that it needs changing.
"It's ok postman , he'll lick you to death" "That isn't really that comforting , I still end up dead !!" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
premier fan BR4 17 May 13 9.47am | |
---|---|
Quote Chelmsfordeagle at 17 May 2013 9.06am
With Watford playing 3 at the back I would like to see Palace start with 2 upfront like we did against Hull and that worked in our favour. Tempted to put Zaha upfront with Wilbs and keep KP in reserve if we need a goal late on. Or we could play 4-3-3 with Wilf and Yannick playing as inside forwards, we can't keep Wilbs isolated on his own as this will in affect give Watford 2 spare players at the back. Agree with Danny H that the midfield is key but can't make my mind up on who should start out of Joniesta, Garvs or Moritz. No chance he will change the tactics of a whole season on one day at wembley when it's winner takes all. It will be the usual 4 2 3 1 and so it should be!!!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
miswell 17 May 13 10.38am | |
---|---|
To clarify to point about Holloway. It's not the mention of loans per se, we've been beaten with that stick all season, it's more his sudden outrage at who we had and how many. It was February and he claimed he had no idea. It did make him look a bit daft. I can't really be bothered to go through the whole loan scenario suffice to say it's different from what most people on the outside think it is. Yes there's a lot (not just from Udinese!) but the main reason we have the loans was timing. The Pozzo's didn't take over until late in the summer and we needed players quickly. The vast majority of the loans won't play for their parent clubs again and we have first refusal to sign them (unless someone else comes in with a big offer). The Pozzo's have a huge pool of talent and they move players to where they think they'll be needed. Ultimately it's up to the player if he wants to move, there were a couple who turned down a move to Watford. Also it's not a loophole, bending the rules or whatever. FIFA's rulebook states international loans are free transfers. Anyone can do it Back to the game, it's good to see you've sold out. Our season ticket only sales end tomorrow so we should see a few more shifted from then on. Just over 17k sold as of last night. The formations that have worked against us this season are those where teams are set up to flood the midfield. Leicester did that for 1 and a half play off games but couldn't maintain it. In the 2nd half we battered them. Barnsley and Bristol City both stopped us from playing and beat us. Huddersfield and Blackburn both stood and watched and we scored 4. Whatever happens I wouldn't begrudge Palace going up. A decent club run by people who want the best for it and with fans who are local. Also you were the best away fans we had at the Vic this season (bar a few of the fools who think it's fun to break things). Both clubs have had crap times in the recent past but both look like they have bright futures.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
David of Kent Hoo 17 May 13 11.08am | |
---|---|
Quote miswell at 17 May 2013 12.27am
First of all I'll point out I'm a Watford fan :-) I know you've seen some people posting about how Watford will win easily etc etc but that's far from the general consensus. While I think we have a decent chance of winning I don't think we've got a greater chance than Palace. Most Watford fans I know have the same feeling (and a little nagging doubt!). It's impossible to call it but I do think it'll be a good game. Whereas we're good going forward we can look a bit shaky at the back. Obviously Murray is a big loss but Phillips always scores against us. Whoever wins will only win by the odd goal. Anyway most Watford fans don't have a problem with Palace although Holloway is becoming a bit of a hate figure. Enjoy the day but not too much! Isn't Holloway only a hate figure with you because he's voiced an opinion that having 8 out of your starting 11 as loanees is ridiculous? Since that loophole that was exploited this season has been closed for next season I'd be inclined to think most people in football agree with him, and since he voiced it after we'd had a draw at your ground, I don't think he said it from a "sour grapes" mind. You're a club of a similar size to our own so I'm sure that, whilst you're the favourites, you're not 100% comfortable with that! We'd likely be the same. Far nicer to be the underdogs if there's only smallish margins between your teams I hope you have a good day in every way on the 27th (apart from the result of the final!)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
miked2006 17 May 13 12.22pm | |
---|---|
I liked Holloway at the very beginning, he was a bit refreshing, but I very quickly grew tired of his treatment of officials and his annoyingly unfunny jokes, despite always attempting to play the clown. The reason Watford hate Holloway however, isn't because he spoke the truth. The reason is he made a whole load of misinformed statements, which the media jumped up on as fact: The loan system stops academy players from coming through - we have had the second highest amount of academy players play in our first team this year (behind M'boro). You also didn't have more English players in your team than us. Having so many loan playing in your team was wrong - we both had 4 loan players on the pitch just before his post match interview. In fact, one of his loan players had just netted the equaliser. And the icing on the cake was that he hadn't even realised what was going on for half the season. How clueless do you have to be? We like your team. You have been in a similar situation as us for many years. We have no problems with your fans and we think you will give us a very tight game Monday week. But Holloway isn't sour grapes. He did not out us as he probably likes to think. He just ranted and acted the clown as ever, and thousands of idiots lapped it up as gospel.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
lazy daze Worcester Park 17 May 13 12.36pm | |
---|---|
As our top goal scorer is out for 6 months how about we square things up and you send back vydra early.... just to keep things even and all? Haha Edited by lazy daze (17 May 2013 12.37pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hambo Crawley 17 May 13 12.37pm | |
---|---|
Quote miked2006 at 17 May 2013 12.22pm
I liked Holloway at the very beginning, he was a bit refreshing, but I very quickly grew tired of his treatment of officials and his annoyingly unfunny jokes, despite always attempting to play the clown. The reason Watford hate Holloway however, isn't because he spoke the truth. The reason is he made a whole load of misinformed statements, which the media jumped up on as fact: The loan system stops academy players from coming through - we have had the second highest amount of academy players play in our first team this year (behind M'boro). You also didn't have more English players in your team than us. Having so many loan playing in your team was wrong - we both had 4 loan players on the pitch just before his post match interview. In fact, one of his loan players had just netted the equaliser. And the icing on the cake was that he hadn't even realised what was going on for half the season. How clueless do you have to be? We like your team. You have been in a similar situation as us for many years. We have no problems with your fans and we think you will give us a very tight game Monday week. But Holloway isn't sour grapes. He did not out us as he probably likes to think. He just ranted and acted the clown as ever, and thousands of idiots lapped it up as gospel.
Personally I don't really care - you've borrowed some great players, some who really are too good for this level, but that's football sometimes. It's easy to look at what he says the way you have but I guarantee you would feel different as an outsider looking in. As for the point about academy players - who would be filling the void if the loans you have weren't considered the same as "permanent transfers" by the FL? However many are in your team, surely some are missing out? You are right to look at the number of loans in our side in that one game - but again, that was not the point he was making. In fact at that time we had to leave a loan player out of the match day squad each week. The point he was making was that the quality and depth of your squad over the whole season was/is down to an international loan loophole. He didn't like it. My own feelings are simply you have broken no rules and it still took a quality manager to gel that team together to produce the results you have got. You deserve to be in the play off final, as do we. I hope we win, not just because I am a Palace fan, but because I can see your situation as something that will not be allowed to happen in the future so would hate to see one team profit from it whilst it is permissable. But it isn't the fault of the players, fans or management so I have no resentment on that issue. I just think you are writing Holloway off without really thinking about the bigger picture he was referring to,. And for the record, as much as I say you would have a different opinion from the outside, I am sure mine would change from your position too. Edited by Hambo (17 May 2013 12.38pm)
HOL Radio Lead Presenter and sampler of processed meats HOL radio - Sunday nights [Link] [Tweet Link] My Twitter: [Tweet Link]
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
homes New Eltham 17 May 13 12.45pm | |
---|---|
Quote Hambo at 17 May 2013 12.37pm
Quote miked2006 at 17 May 2013 12.22pm
I liked Holloway at the very beginning, he was a bit refreshing, but I very quickly grew tired of his treatment of officials and his annoyingly unfunny jokes, despite always attempting to play the clown. The reason Watford hate Holloway however, isn't because he spoke the truth. The reason is he made a whole load of misinformed statements, which the media jumped up on as fact: The loan system stops academy players from coming through - we have had the second highest amount of academy players play in our first team this year (behind M'boro). You also didn't have more English players in your team than us. Having so many loan playing in your team was wrong - we both had 4 loan players on the pitch just before his post match interview. In fact, one of his loan players had just netted the equaliser. And the icing on the cake was that he hadn't even realised what was going on for half the season. How clueless do you have to be? We like your team. You have been in a similar situation as us for many years. We have no problems with your fans and we think you will give us a very tight game Monday week. But Holloway isn't sour grapes. He did not out us as he probably likes to think. He just ranted and acted the clown as ever, and thousands of idiots lapped it up as gospel.
Personally I don't really care - you've borrowed some great players, some who really are too good for this level, but that's football sometimes. It's easy to look at what he says the way you have but I guarantee you would feel different as an outsider looking in. As for the point about academy players - who would be filling the void if the loans you have weren't considered the same as "permanent transfers" by the FL? However many are in your team, surely some are missing out? You are right to look at the number of loans in our side in that one game - but again, that was not the point he was making. In fact at that time we had to leave a loan player out of the match day squad each week. The point he was making was that the quality and depth of your squad over the whole season was/is down to an international loan loophole. He didn't like it. My own feelings are simply you have broken no rules and it still took a quality manager to gel that team together to produce the results you have got. You deserve to be in the play off final, as do we. I hope we win, not just because I am a Palace fan, but because I can see your situation as something that will not be allowed to happen in the future so would hate to see one team profit from it whilst it is permissable. But it isn't the fault of the players, fans or management so I have no resentment on that issue. I just think you are writing Holloway off without really thinking about the bigger picture he was referring to,. And for the record, as much as I say you would have a different opinion from the outside, I am sure mine would change from your position too.
IH: "I thought Jonny and Wilf were brilliant but it took a 39 year old master to watch the ball and keep his eye on it to finish it". |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
miswell 17 May 13 12.53pm | |
---|---|
Opinions are certainly split depending what side of the fence you're on. There was certainly some apprehension when these guys took over and then suddenly gave us a group of players many had never heard of. Most have worked out, some haven't and went back. The alternative this season would have probably been relegation with some proper donkey's and journeyman in the side. We were completely skint and most likely heading for admin. Youth players have been given a chance this season. That said they would have played more games if we didn't have the connections we have now. But then if we had played them instead of the loans where would we be? Not in the play off final that's for sure. I can see how other fans look at is as an unfair advantage. We look at it as taking advantage of a situation and being able to compete towards to the top without risking the future of the club. Who doesn't want that? The Pozzo's also stated that one thing that really attracted them to our club was the academy. We still have some great prospects coming through, some of the best we've ever had. The problem will be if we go up. How many Premier League clubs bring through wave after wave of academy products? Not many. Reason being it's quicker to buy now rather than nurture. The way football in this country is going small clubs like Watford are being left behind and there was nothing we could do to try and keep up. We now have that chance.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
miswell 17 May 13 1.14pm | |
---|---|
This has kind of digressed from the final, apologies And to answer a previous question, no, I think we might hold on to Vydra for this game!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.