This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Matov 22 Aug 19 7.48am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jeeagles
One of the biggest problems with the EU is that it has no defined scope or remit. The phrase "an ever closer union" doesn't actually mean anything. Therefore, like any badly run bureaucracy it's full of high paid people making laws and processes for the sake of it. A lot of the time they are pointless and expensive. The politicians and civil servants involved are the only people who really benefit, and they are unaccountable because no one ever bothers to turn up and vote in EU elections.
I have always said that there is a case to be made for a federalised Europe. But I want it made out in the open and not effectively imposed on us which is what is happening. Never quite understood why the EU, if it is the benign body of optimistic co-operation that many of its adherents claim it to be, requires the trappings of a nation state such as a flag or an anthem or even its own foreign policy and proposed military, let alone a single currency. All of those only make sense if the end game is to effectively create a USE. And to give credit where it is due, people like Guy Verhofstadt make no bones about this as their ambition/goal for the EU. That I can respect because it is out in the open. Not my cup of tea but at least the man can make his case and people decide accordingly. That I salute as a perfectly legitimate political aspiration If the EU is only a stepping stone towards an effective USE then it is for the best of all parties concerned that we leave. Lets be honest here, the only reason the EU is kicking up a fuss about us departing is because it wants to protect our market for its goods. The Irish border issue is nothing to do with the actual Irish border but everything to do with trying to ensure that EU producers do not have to compete with others for the British consumers hard earned pound in their weekly shopping. The EU's remit from day one has been to protect their own producers. Again, I get that. What I struggle with to the point of having to curb my anger is why May and her team seemed so keen to acquiesce because it is treachery and I do not use that word either lightly or without understanding the full conatations of it. HMG's primary duty of care is towards its own citizens and it strikes me that this was not at the forefront of the thinking going on in Westminster up to a month of so ago. May's job was to do her best for the British people. That is it. And she plainly did not, along with Phillip Hammond who it is clear now was the primary mover behind attempting to sell us down the river. It is betrayal on a level that almost beggers belief. And why we need to leave with No Deal. There simply is not one of the table as things stand and all this posturing going on at the moment is pure window dressing. Actually rather annoyed with Johnson for even sitting down to talk with Macron or Merkal, let alone waste a single minute on the phone to Varadkar because it boils down to a simple reality that until that backstop is dropped, there is nothing else to discuss. Also makes me wonder what is going on. So far been willing to give Johnson the benefit of the doubt (although not my vote. That still goes, as things stand, solely to the Brexit Party) but am beginning to smell a rat now although I will concede that I am paranoid about our conventional political class to an extent that borders on the unhinged at times. Let us see. Edited by Matov (22 Aug 2019 7.51am)
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 22 Aug 19 8.12am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
I have always said that there is a case to be made for a federalised Europe. But I want it made out in the open and not effectively imposed on us which is what is happening. Never quite understood why the EU, if it is the benign body of optimistic co-operation that many of its adherents claim it to be, requires the trappings of a nation state such as a flag or an anthem or even its own foreign policy and proposed military, let alone a single currency. All of those only make sense if the end game is to effectively create a USE. And to give credit where it is due, people like Guy Verhofstadt make no bones about this as their ambition/goal for the EU. That I can respect because it is out in the open. Not my cup of tea but at least the man can make his case and people decide accordingly. That I salute as a perfectly legitimate political aspiration If the EU is only a stepping stone towards an effective USE then it is for the best of all parties concerned that we leave. Lets be honest here, the only reason the EU is kicking up a fuss about us departing is because it wants to protect our market for its goods. The Irish border issue is nothing to do with the actual Irish border but everything to do with trying to ensure that EU producers do not have to compete with others for the British consumers hard earned pound in their weekly shopping. The EU's remit from day one has been to protect their own producers. Again, I get that. What I struggle with to the point of having to curb my anger is why May and her team seemed so keen to acquiesce because it is treachery and I do not use that word either lightly or without understanding the full conatations of it. HMG's primary duty of care is towards its own citizens and it strikes me that this was not at the forefront of the thinking going on in Westminster up to a month of so ago. May's job was to do her best for the British people. That is it. And she plainly did not, along with Phillip Hammond who it is clear now was the primary mover behind attempting to sell us down the river. It is betrayal on a level that almost beggers belief. And why we need to leave with No Deal. There simply is not one of the table as things stand and all this posturing going on at the moment is pure window dressing. Actually rather annoyed with Johnson for even sitting down to talk with Macron or Merkal, let alone waste a single minute on the phone to Varadkar because it boils down to a simple reality that until that backstop is dropped, there is nothing else to discuss. Also makes me wonder what is going on. So far been willing to give Johnson the benefit of the doubt (although not my vote. That still goes, as things stand, solely to the Brexit Party) but am beginning to smell a rat now although I will concede that I am paranoid about our conventional political class to an extent that borders on the unhinged at times. Let us see. Edited by Matov (22 Aug 2019 7.51am) Good Post. I keep asking Remainers what they want because the status quo is not on the table. If they want to embrace the EU dream then fair enough if however they just want no change then what they are really asking is for the UK to continue to fight the EU every time a change is proposed. We are toxic to the rest of the EU which is why it is better for both parties to go own their way. I do not get those UK politicians who are arguing we should take no deal off the table. Until the EU agrees to remove the backstop there is nothing to discuss. Parliament has rejected that deal 3 times what else can Boris do apart from make it clear to the EU that we are leaving unless they negotiate. Corbyn's position to ask for a further 6 months is ludicrous. Now if a deal is agreed in outline and the EU and the UK need more time to finalise the small print then that is another matter. Asking for more time when the other side wont talk is just plain stupid. Some of the press are now saying that Merkel has blinked I don't think she has I think she has just sounded reasonable so when we exit with no deal she won't get the blame. I hope I am wrong but I can't see the EU backing down.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 22 Aug 19 11.40am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
More a squint than a blink but the meeting yesterday did at least come with a perception of a meeting of equals as opposed to May who appeared nothing more than a subservient employee who could not deliver what her superiors demanded. It is clear that the EU are banking their hopes on our treacherous political elite managing to block our exit on October 31st with the hope will lead to us not leaving at all but I suspect that Johnson will manage to survive September. Sticking my neck out here but I suspect that Johnson is going to present Parliament with a stark choice. Either back our departure on October 31st or revoke A50. And I am convinced that Labour MP's, by way of abstaining, will hand him the way forward. Once we leave then UK politics should reset and they are then back in the game. The issue has to be done and dusted by November 1st. If we are not out by then then we will never leave, at least in this particular bout of politics and the vote on June 23rd will have been betrayed. If we still have our star on that s***ty flag come November 1st then the Tory party is finished. All bets are off about what comes next but the Brexit Party becomes the true opposition then because this fight not only goes on but ramps up. That is what I struggle to understand about those who want us to remain. If we are still in the UK come November 1st then this does not go away. The divisions become not only worse but entrenched to the point of no return.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 22 Aug 19 12.11pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
More a squint than a blink but the meeting yesterday did at least come with a perception of a meeting of equals as opposed to May who appeared nothing more than a subservient employee who could not deliver what her superiors demanded. It is clear that the EU are banking their hopes on our treacherous political elite managing to block our exit on October 31st with the hope will lead to us not leaving at all but I suspect that Johnson will manage to survive September. Sticking my neck out here but I suspect that Johnson is going to present Parliament with a stark choice. Either back our departure on October 31st or revoke A50. And I am convinced that Labour MP's, by way of abstaining, will hand him the way forward. Once we leave then UK politics should reset and they are then back in the game. The issue has to be done and dusted by November 1st. If we are not out by then then we will never leave, at least in this particular bout of politics and the vote on June 23rd will have been betrayed. If we still have our star on that s***ty flag come November 1st then the Tory party is finished. All bets are off about what comes next but the Brexit Party becomes the true opposition then because this fight not only goes on but ramps up. That is what I struggle to understand about those who want us to remain. If we are still in the UK come November 1st then this does not go away. The divisions become not only worse but entrenched to the point of no return. I mention the other day it would sort Corbyn to have the GE after the end of October. If he forces one before we Brexit he will have to explain to the electorate what his Brexit policy is. "Vote Labour we will oppose any Tory Brexit deal. Where as if we have left Corbyn will probably say it's time to move on from Brexit and let's talk about health, education, employment etc. He then campaign on his strengths whilst blaming the Tories for Brexit. So maybe Corbyn won't be too upset if a few Labour rebels side with the government or abstain. He can always get his revenge on them at a later date.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyboy1978 22 Aug 19 12.45pm | |
---|---|
Surely we must know who comes and goes, We've had 3 years to prepare and no system!!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 22 Aug 19 1.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
So maybe Corbyn won't be too upset if a few Labour rebels side with the government or abstain. He can always get his revenge on them at a later date.
As to revenge, then nah. Those Labour rebels will actually save their party. The constituency breakdown of both the June 2016 vote and the recent EU elections tells you all you need to know about how the maths works out. Brexit is the spoiler on politics at the moment. Back in 2017 both main parties promised to honour the 2016 referendum vote so although it was an issue, it did not dominate. Once we leave (with the proviso it is a clean break that can be perceived as such) then politics will reset to how it was and the Lib Dems put back in their box as just weirdos that both main parties hate. Labour stand only to lose by us not departing the EU on October 31st.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 22 Aug 19 2.35pm | |
---|---|
Macron's only appeal to his own voters is his constant anti-English claptrap. Even the French can see through it and most support the yellow vests or Marine Le Penn. Just not so sure they will be able to rig the next election as easily.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 22 Aug 19 4.19pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dannyboy1978
Surely we must know who comes and goes, We've had 3 years to prepare and no system!! Why are our passports scanned when we come back in to the UK from overseas holidays if the information isn't matched to previously leaving the UK
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 22 Aug 19 4.30pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dannyboy1978
Surely we must know who comes and goes, We've had 3 years to prepare and no system!! For once the BBC is correct. I have a Dutch friend who has lived here for over 40 years. So if she goes on holiday how will immigration know she has the right to stay here as opposed to a johnny come lately? She hasn't started the process to register because she felt if we don't leave it's not necessary I suspect many EU nationals feel the same. Mrs May also said freedom of movement would end in 2021 so there was no rush. Don't get me wrong I want to end freedom of movement but we have to have a practical process in place before we start stopping people at the border. I suspect that when the government says it ends on 31st Oct they mean in principle. My friend is in her seventies she doesn't need this sort of stress c'mon Boris sort it out.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 22 Aug 19 4.54pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
And why we need to leave with No Deal. There simply is not one of the table as things stand and all this posturing going on at the moment is pure window dressing. Actually rather annoyed with Johnson for even sitting down to talk with Macron or Merkal, let alone waste a single minute on the phone to Varadkar because it boils down to a simple reality that until that backstop is dropped, there is nothing else to discuss. He can honestly say that he tried his best to hammer out a compromise but the gang of three weren't interested so we can go ahead with no deal as that is the only thing left
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chris123 hove actually 22 Aug 19 4.59pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
For once the BBC is correct. I have a Dutch friend who has lived here for over 40 years. So if she goes on holiday how will immigration know she has the right to stay here as opposed to a johnny come lately? She hasn't started the process to register because she felt if we don't leave it's not necessary I suspect many EU nationals feel the same. Mrs May also said freedom of movement would end in 2021 so there was no rush. Don't get me wrong I want to end freedom of movement but we have to have a practical process in place before we start stopping people at the border. I suspect that when the government says it ends on 31st Oct they mean in principle. My friend is in her seventies she doesn't need this sort of stress c'mon Boris sort it out. Similar with Belgian friend since school - there's an application based on a scanned passport.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyboy1978 22 Aug 19 5.40pm | |
---|---|
Well that was simple!! Of coarse the BBC don't have it as a top story but go with this instead! Edited by dannyboy1978 (22 Aug 2019 5.42pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.