This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Behind Enemy Lines Sussex 02 Mar 23 11.16am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Strategy is part of the role of Central Office who would certainly have been involved. I have no doubt at all about that. Big decisions of this kind are not taken just by a PM. Cameron was the face that launched this ship and eventually sunk it, but he would have been given advice and analysis from behind the scenes. Cameron had many other things to keep him busy. This is an interesting analysis:- Where Cameron went wrong was that he openly supported and touted for a Remain situation. He and the Cabinet members should have stepped aside and not canvassed either way. By nailing his colours to the mast he had no option but to step aside when Leave won, thereby implying that he was not a person who could deliver what the electorate wanted, only what he wanted.
hats off to palace, they were always gonna be louder, and hate to say it but they were impressive ALL bouncing and singing. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PalazioVecchio south pole 02 Mar 23 11.47am | |
---|---|
i predict the Euro currency will split into two variants....E1 and E2. One of them strong, for places like Germany, Netherlands. And E2....for all the trainwreck economies....Greece, Portugal, Italy etc.
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 02 Mar 23 11.56am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Behind Enemy Lines
Where Cameron went wrong was that he openly supported and touted for a Remain situation. He and the Cabinet members should have stepped aside and not canvassed either way. By nailing his colours to the mast he had no option but to step aside when Leave won, thereby implying that he was not a person who could deliver what the electorate wanted, only what he wanted. Cameron gets slated but the reality was that all conventional political thinking was around the notion, 'it is the economy stupid'. And it had led to him emerging victorious from the Scottish Indy referendum. He had to pick a side. And Remain looked, based on very, very flawed polling methodology, the winning option. It had the vast majority of organised political support, it had almost 100% backing from public figures from across the spectrum. Should have been a nailed-on cert to win. But where Remain got it vastly wrong, and even those on the Leave side never truly grasped the scale of it, was the vote itself was primarily about identity. People saw it, and still do, as something defining them on a much deeper level than just the impact on their wallets. Plus Remain never truly promoted the benefits of the EU. In fact, a huge swathe of them conceded, time after time, how it needed reforming. Nothing positive about the vision of what it could potentially represent. Ultimately, and as pat and seemingly shallow as it might seem, the vote was between those who wanted a Red passport and those who wanted a traditional Blue/Black. The core question being how you defined yourself as an individual. I truly never understood how much the notion of being a citizen of the European Union meant to many of those on the Remain side. But ultimately, it was what it came down to. And why so many still whinge and bitch now. Many on the Remain side truly felt a pain I never even considered. And whilst my heart still pumps piss for them given the abuse heaped on those of us on the Leave side by many of them, I can at least acknowledge the impact Leave winning had. A choice. British or European. And the impact on your bank account, for once, relegated to a lesser consideration. Edited by Matov (02 Mar 2023 11.59am)
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 02 Mar 23 12.30pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by HKOwen
It's counsel not council. Perhaps you should check your dictionary. You really are not as educated and erudite as you try to portray in your verbose ramblings. I have never considered myself "educated and erudite" so if you perceive me as such I am flattered. I left school at 16, but did OK afterwards. Most of any education I have has been via experience but I sometimes miss things. It happens to most of us, but if it offends then my apologies.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 02 Mar 23 12.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by georgenorman
Who the hell do you think you are demanding that you are given details of a gift from my mother? It is not generally accepted at all that the 1930 election was fixed. The authorities then were dismayed at the result but honoured it. Of course government is better if it is as open and transparent as is practicable. Edited by georgenorman (02 Mar 2023 10.51am) I am not demanding anything. You brought this "dictionary" into the discussion, and now you are using excuses to try to justify why you won't provide details. It's up to you. If you can, you will. If you can't, you won't. It wasn't the 1930 election that was fixed, but those that followed and saw Hitler become a dictator. If you don't think using terror as a political weapon isn't fixing elections then I do. Of course, we need government to be open and transparent in its decision-making. Collectively. Not all the strands of opinion that when added together produce the collective decision. It's not in our ultimate interests to tie the hands of our representatives or ask them to vote against their conscience. They aren't delegates. They are representatives and must be totally free to decide what's best.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 02 Mar 23 1.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I am not demanding anything. You brought this "dictionary" into the discussion, and now you are using excuses to try to justify why you won't provide details. It's up to you. If you can, you will. If you can't, you won't. It wasn't the 1930 election that was fixed, but those that followed and saw Hitler become a dictator. If you don't think using terror as a political weapon isn't fixing elections then I do. Of course, we need government to be open and transparent in its decision-making. Collectively. Not all the strands of opinion that when added together produce the collective decision. It's not in our ultimate interests to tie the hands of our representatives or ask them to vote against their conscience. They aren't delegates. They are representatives and must be totally free to decide what's best. That might have been true when most of the population were uneducated/illiterate and barely affected by the decisions made.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
georgenorman 02 Mar 23 1.59pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I am not demanding anything. You brought this "dictionary" into the discussion, and now you are using excuses to try to justify why you won't provide details. It's up to you. If you can, you will. If you can't, you won't. It wasn't the 1930 election that was fixed, but those that followed and saw Hitler become a dictator. If you don't think using terror as a political weapon isn't fixing elections then I do. Of course, we need government to be open and transparent in its decision-making. Collectively. Not all the strands of opinion that when added together produce the collective decision. It's not in our ultimate interests to tie the hands of our representatives or ask them to vote against their conscience. They aren't delegates. They are representatives and must be totally free to decide what's best. Are you saying that I made up the dictionary definition? In your previous post you said it is well known that early 1930s elections were rigged, now you are saying the 1930 election wasn’t!Certainly the few elections and referendums following Hitler becoming leader were rigged, I’ve never said otherwise. Any reasonable person would want to know how their MPs have voted on various issues, it is a key factor in deciding whether to vote for them or not.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Forest Hillbilly in a hidey-hole 02 Mar 23 2.28pm | |
---|---|
** EDIT wrong thread Edited by Forest Hillbilly (02 Mar 2023 2.47pm)
I disengage, I turn the page. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 02 Mar 23 4.54pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Sunak says being in single market and UK makes Northern Ireland 'world's most exciting economic zone'!
NI had privileged access to Europe by its single market membership, so it is logical especially with easing the rules, that it now has the best of both worlds. but Great Britain for 'reasons' doesn't and will not, investors wishing to access the single market will invest in NI. Its an admittance from the British Prime Minister that brexit is bad for Great Britain. NI can sit on the deal as they were perfectly well off with the protocol in the first place.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 02 Mar 23 9.07pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I have never considered myself "educated and erudite" so if you perceive me as such I am flattered. I left school at 16, but did OK afterwards. Most of any education I have as been via experience but I sometimes miss things. It happens to most of us, but if it offends then my apologies. Dictionary Don't flatter yourself, I never perceived you as such. I am not offended or surprised. Edited by HKOwen (02 Mar 2023 9.12pm)
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 02 Mar 23 9.10pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
NI had privileged access to Europe by its single market membership, so it is logical especially with easing the rules, that it now has the best of both worlds. but Great Britain for 'reasons' doesn't and will not, investors wishing to access the single market will invest in NI. Its an admittance from the British Prime Minister that brexit is bad for Great Britain. NI can sit on the deal as they were perfectly well off with the protocol in the first place.
Sorry but this is just meaningless waffle. You believe that the protocol made NI "perfectly well off "? Maybe you are being sarcastic and I am not seeing it
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 02 Mar 23 10.28pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by georgenorman
Are you saying that I made up the dictionary definition? In your previous post you said it is well known that early 1930s elections were rigged, now you are saying the 1930 election wasn’t!Certainly the few elections and referendums following Hitler becoming leader were rigged, I’ve never said otherwise. Any reasonable person would want to know how their MPs have voted on various issues, it is a key factor in deciding whether to vote for them or not. I doubt that you made it up. The words don't read as yours. What I doubt is whether it came from a source that can be trusted in the context. Without knowing that source that doubt cannot be tested. There were a number of elections in Germany in the early 1930s, resulting in Hitler gaining power and passing the Act in 1933, which enabled him to become a dictator and start using terror. 1933 is still the early 1930s! Any reasonable person would want their MP to take the best decisions they could. Ever heard the concept of keeping a dog, but barking yourself? We need to choose, delegate and trust. Not choose, instruct and observe. We might as well send voting machines to Parliament otherwise and just allow a PM to set all the policies. Just as Johnson thought he could.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.