This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
chris123 hove actually 14 Dec 19 11.13am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
Beginning to suspect there might not be a Labour Party, in its current form, left to lead. Over the last 10-15 years the only thing that has held it together is the FPTP system with its core base dependent on its tribal support. Scotland was the first to go and now large swathes of the North. The differences between its traditional voters and the progressive types who now dominate the membership are to wide to bridge. Corbyn did have, at least to the start with, the ability to do both but now? Seriously, who is there? Labour have a catch 22 in how they select their leaders. Meaning that the Progressive types, who dominate the membership will only vote for somebody who simply cannot, and will not, be willing to pander to the wishes of the voters they need to capture back. Len McClusky is the key to this. Needs to insist that the TU's are given the prominent role in choosing who leads the LP. A third of the NEC is union.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 14 Dec 19 11.27am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by chris123
A third of the NEC is union. But it is the leadership that matters. There are enough Momentum types now in the Labour party to ensure that a Progressive candidate is always nominated and the membership will vote for them. As it stands you get, at best, a Corbyn lite. Who will no doubt proclaim themselves as fully 'Rejoin'. Now I have no issue with anybody who wants us to rejoin the EU once we have left. A perfectly legitimate political aspiration to hold but does it get Labour back the seats it needs? I suspect not. So the Left has to split. I am sure it would co-operate in Parliament but the Labour party in its current format is simply not fit for purpose. Cannot see any future for it. If Labour want to regain the Blythe Valley and hold on to Putney which it needs to do if it is to get back into Government, it lacks the ability to conjure up a leader who can appeal to both.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chris123 hove actually 14 Dec 19 11.37am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
But it is the leadership that matters. There are enough Momentum types now in the Labour party to ensure that a Progressive candidate is always nominated and the membership will vote for them. As it stands you get, at best, a Corbyn lite. Who will no doubt proclaim themselves as fully 'Rejoin'. Now I have no issue with anybody who wants us to rejoin the EU once we have left. A perfectly legitimate political aspiration to hold but does it get Labour back the seats it needs? I suspect not. So the Left has to split. I am sure it would co-operate in Parliament but the Labour party in its current format is simply not fit for purpose. Cannot see any future for it. If Labour want to regain the Blythe Valley and hold on to Putney which it needs to do if it is to get back into Government, it lacks the ability to conjure up a leader who can appeal to both. We'd have to join the euro though I expect.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 14 Dec 19 11.46am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by chris123
We'd have to join the euro though I expect. With no renationalising of British industry being the, proverbial only, spanner in the Islington dinner party works.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 14 Dec 19 11.51am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Make no mistake. This is the sort of thing a lot of people were voting against on Thursday. This country is losing what made it great because of people like this. ‘Mostly people agreed about the need to invest more, some were even willing to pay more tax.’ Just some were even willing to pay more tax then. The threats at the end she’s not going away mean we should be scared. The bit about harsh immigration policy raises an eyebrow. She and they just don’t get it. How dare we have an opinion on immigration when we should keep the door open. Open it wider according to Corbyn. The bit about investing is going to be answered. The cuts have probably been too long imo, but it depends how the economy is stimulated. Edited by Rudi Hedman (14 Dec 2019 11.52am)
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 14 Dec 19 11.58am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by chris123
We'd have to join the euro though I expect.
I suspect it will be a few years, possibly decades, before it gains any real traction so what form or conditions our rejoining might take but if memberhship of the Euro is a cast-iron conditional then it is not going to happen. I always said that if Remain had won then the UK should join up with not only the Euro but also become members of the Shengan agreement and so on. One of my objections to the EU is that it is neither one thing or the other. And if we were to remain in the EU then taking charge would have been essential. Always believed there are strong arguments for a federalised Europe and the notion of one single political and economic entity that stretches from the beaches of Portugal to the West to the borders of China (including Russia in it would be immense) in the East, and the Artic circle in the North down to the Greek Islands in the Agean is an incredible vision and with the right leadership and ethos, perhaps the greatest global super-power ever. But nobody has the courage to make that. C'est la vie.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Henry of Peckham Eton Mess 14 Dec 19 12.02pm | |
---|---|
Despite what politicians believe and practice in the Fairyland they call Parliament ... the electorate is not stupid and democracy is not moribund. Power to the People.
Denial is not just a river in Egypt |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jeeagles 14 Dec 19 12.16pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
I suspect it will be a few years, possibly decades, before it gains any real traction so what form or conditions our rejoining might take but if memberhship of the Euro is a cast-iron conditional then it is not going to happen. I always said that if Remain had won then the UK should join up with not only the Euro but also become members of the Shengan agreement and so on. One of my objections to the EU is that it is neither one thing or the other. And if we were to remain in the EU then taking charge would have been essential. Always believed there are strong arguments for a federalised Europe and the notion of one single political and economic entity that stretches from the beaches of Portugal to the West to the borders of China (including Russia in it would be immense) in the East, and the Artic circle in the North down to the Greek Islands in the Agean is an incredible vision and with the right leadership and ethos, perhaps the greatest global super-power ever. But nobody has the courage to make that. C'est la vie. Interesting point. Makes you wonder why the EU wants us as a member if we arent willing to fully participate. With that in mind the EU is probably better of with us not a part of it, but having a close relationship with them. However, in all the dealings I've had with the EC or the EU, they are mostly a self serving organisation. They want to make themselves bigger, not because it's the right system of governance for the people that they represent, but because the bigger organisation is, the more power they have, and the more money they get. I suspect ££££ is main reason they wanted us to stay, but that doesn't work if your goals dont match.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Uphill Bedford 14 Dec 19 12.34pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
It was the one seat I didn't want to flip. Is anyone sensible left in there? Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Dec 2019 10.20am) I am Tory but was upset that a principled Labour MP lost in Don Valley. She supported Brexit and her constituents and was a beacon of common sense amongst the mad hatters. Labour needs people like her. That was the only down side of the election for me. Highlights: 1. Gina Miller finally getting her comeuppance The hard part now starts and we shall see how sensible the PM is, the buffoonish exterior hopefully hides a compassionate inner.
Man and boy Palace since my first game in 1948 sitting on my dad's shoulders |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 14 Dec 19 1.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Watch the left wing media treat Corbyn now. They spent years building him up and defending him. Now they are going to tear him limb from limb. It's already started on election night they were queuing up to throw him under the bus "Our policies are popular it's Brexit and Corbyn". So far none of the potential candidates stand out as leadership material they just espouse the same views as Corbyn. Sill I am not the target audience but i am very much afraid that Labour will listen to it's self and not to the voters. The Momentum leader kept saying our policies are good we need to improve our message and convince the voters. That's like saying it's okay folks the Titanic is safe we got new deckchairs.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 14 Dec 19 1.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Uphill
I am Tory but was upset that a principled Labour MP lost in Don Valley. She supported Brexit and her constituents and was a beacon of common sense amongst the mad hatters. Labour needs people like her. That was the only down side of the election for me. Highlights: 1. Gina Miller finally getting her comeuppance The hard part now starts and we shall see how sensible the PM is, the buffoonish exterior hopefully hides a compassionate inner. Good post.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
davenotamonkey 14 Dec 19 3.41pm | |
---|---|
Why in the hell didn't Corbyn resign right away? Completely step down? Miliband resigned immediately after losing. Most leaders do. Why not Corbyn? I personally hope it's because he wants to install a Corbynite successor. Someone like Wrong-Daily - that would be comedy. The longer Momentum maintains it's grip on Labour, the longer it remains utterly unelectable. It will be a miracle if Labour get a 20% swing at the next election. Unprecedented. Boris has 2 terms, possibly 3 by the time they claw back Friday's swing. I'm very happy watching Labour eviscerate themselves in the meantime. If it takes 5+ years to purge Labour of these far-left loons, then great. Time for popcorn.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.