This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Hrolf The Ganger 24 Mar 19 9.47pm | |
---|---|
Thousands of liberals will be crying into their Quorn.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ChrisGC Wantage 24 Mar 19 10.55pm | |
---|---|
They have thrown everything at him and he strides on like a boss.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 25 Mar 19 12.16am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Penge Eagle
Where has the anti-Trump brigade gone??? Analysing, reflecting and reading between the lines to try to understand what the all the parsing means. The Mueller report is not, and never was going to be, anything more than part of a process. There is as much left unsaid as said by the Barr summary. A summary produced by an AJ appointed by Trump. Only when Congress gets the whole report, it's committees have all done their work, and the various jurisdictions preparing indictments have all concluded. will any objective judgements be possible. That won't stop the Trump cult members crowing and claiming complete vindication but there is much water to flow under the bridge yet so I would not be laughing too loudly just yet if I were Trump. He certainly acts guilty for an innocent man.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ChrisGC Wantage 25 Mar 19 6.29am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Analysing, reflecting and reading between the lines to try to understand what the all the parsing means. The Mueller report is not, and never was going to be, anything more than part of a process. There is as much left unsaid as said by the Barr summary. A summary produced by an AJ appointed by Trump. Only when Congress gets the whole report, it's committees have all done their work, and the various jurisdictions preparing indictments have all concluded. will any objective judgements be possible. That won't stop the Trump cult members crowing and claiming complete vindication but there is much water to flow under the bridge yet so I would not be laughing too loudly just yet if I were Trump. He certainly acts guilty for an innocent man. "There is no evidence of collusion" It's f***ing over. Barr slung in a cheap one liner in amongst all the exoneration to the effect of "just because we didn't find anything, it doesn't mean the campaign is totally innocent" which I'm sure you'll agree is unconvincingly vague given the specifics of the rest of the content. They've smeared him politically, professionally and personally. There's "comedy" shows devoting themselves to slandering him every night. And he's beaten them all. What a winner. Edited by ChrisGC (25 Mar 2019 6.30am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 25 Mar 19 8.40am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Analysing, reflecting and reading between the lines to try to understand what the all the parsing means. The Mueller report is not, and never was going to be, anything more than part of a process. There is as much left unsaid as said by the Barr summary. A summary produced by an AJ appointed by Trump. Only when Congress gets the whole report, it's committees have all done their work, and the various jurisdictions preparing indictments have all concluded. will any objective judgements be possible. That won't stop the Trump cult members crowing and claiming complete vindication but there is much water to flow under the bridge yet so I would not be laughing too loudly just yet if I were Trump. He certainly acts guilty for an innocent man. Well fair play to you for coming onto the thread. But it's already been said that there will be no more indictments. What you are talking about is the desperate meowings of democratic party activists and mainstream media who are trying to cover for the fact that they have been lying to their supporters for years now. All of Trump's team and dealings have been poured over massively....Yet with Clinton it was a complete joke. The left and the media, who are losing even more credibility will look for anything...of that I have little doubt. They will look for anything they can possibly make more media about and talk up...but it will result in no more convictions....and nothing over collusion. They lied.....Politicians, activists and media lied....imagine my shock. Edited by Stirlingsays (25 Mar 2019 9.59am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 25 Mar 19 9.33am | |
---|---|
Sargon is understandably having fun with this.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 25 Mar 19 9.56am | |
---|---|
2 Years. Result....No collusion - insufficient evidence of obstruction. What a colossal almost criminal waste of taxpayer money. I can only imagine it was to give both the democrats and media something to blame and talk about over 2016. Sure, Trump's maybe an arse as a person, but hey, what's their excuse? There are no ethnics is politics, only power.....and the difference is one side lie about being ethical far more than the other.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Penge Eagle Beckenham 25 Mar 19 10.17am | |
---|---|
Yet again proves that CNN, MSNBC, the Washington Post, New York times et al are not made up of respected journalists but activists for the Democratic party.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Badger11 Beckenham 25 Mar 19 10.21am | |
---|---|
Special prosecutors are meant to be independent they are in fact creatures of the people who appoint them. They rarely stick to the task they are giving and and end up just muck raking as has happened here. This is not just a moan about the Democrats, Republicans did the same with President Clinton. The whole process stinks of partisan politics and does an injustice to the American people. I don't doubt that there are things in Trumps past he would like to keep quiet but not exonerating him after finding no evidence seems petty and speaks more about Mueller than it does the president. Hopefully politicians on both sides will realise that this type of investigation is harmful to politics and ensure that in future the parameters are clearly defined. It's ironic that in the USA if you have a warrant to search for drugs and find something else that is illegal and no drugs it is quite likely that the judge will throw the search out as a "fishing expedition" and yet it is OK to do that with the president. Back at the beginning one of the triggers for all this was an British intelligence officer who made all sorts of lurid claims about Trump and Russian prostitutes. It may have escaped attention by the media but in court the other week he admitted his source of "intel" was a social media forum, in other words no creditable source at all.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 25 Mar 19 10.37am | |
---|---|
How is the UK version of Russian interference in elections going? I always assumed it was nonsense. Walking to the poll in Croydon Central last election I was expecting a black car to pull up any moment and remove me to the Lubianka for interrogation. Alas no gulag for me........
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 25 Mar 19 10.46am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
Special prosecutors are meant to be independent they are in fact creatures of the people who appoint them. They rarely stick to the task they are giving and and end up just muck raking as has happened here. This is not just a moan about the Democrats, Republicans did the same with President Clinton. The whole process stinks of partisan politics and does an injustice to the American people. I don't doubt that there are things in Trumps past he would like to keep quiet but not exonerating him after finding no evidence seems petty and speaks more about Mueller than it does the president. Hopefully politicians on both sides will realise that this type of investigation is harmful to politics and ensure that in future the parameters are clearly defined. It's ironic that in the USA if you have a warrant to search for drugs and find something else that is illegal and no drugs it is quite likely that the judge will throw the search out as a "fishing expedition" and yet it is OK to do that with the president. Back at the beginning one of the triggers for all this was an British intelligence officer who made all sorts of lurid claims about Trump and Russian prostitutes. It may have escaped attention by the media but in court the other week he admitted his source of "intel" was a social media forum, in other words no creditable source at all. A very good post. There really needs to be a coming together of the sensible people within both parties and a serious attempt made to clean up the abuses of the system. We can see how both parties abuse and manipulate to suit agendas and it all amounts to a corruption justified by bias. True objectivity may be impossible.....but if we don't have enough people committed to truth over agenda we are in trouble.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 25 Mar 19 10.54am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
How is the UK version of Russian interference in elections going? I always assumed it was nonsense. Walking to the poll in Croydon Central last election I was expecting a black car to pull up any moment and remove me to the Lubianka for interrogation. Alas no gulag for me........ I have little doubt there is interference by countries like Russia and China. The opportunity is there for them and I have no doubt we (the west) interfere in Russia's interests....or to be more accurate Putin's. I just require evidence and I don't like media that present claims as truth to make money off of people's bias. I don't know what the answer is. Edited by Stirlingsays (25 Mar 2019 10.57am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.