It's a fascinating article, shot full of holes and almost shockingly un-self conscious, but fascinating all the same.....and very very BBC.

Incidents of lefty violence against Brexit....Off the top of my noggin we had Farage getting milkshaked....I remember Sargon was attacked a couple of times in the street campaigning for Ukip.

This I will add, since I missed your message where you said you wanted me to continue to argue this point.

Recognision of a type of person and relationship is not 'promotion of a lifestyle'. Neither a sexual preference nor a race is in and of itself a 'lifestyle'. Sure if we're going to point to a worse case scenario of behaviour, for the former example there are those engaging in gangs, and for the latter unprotected sex. Those are ill advised lifestyles. In neither case, in an educational environment are those lifestyles promoted. In fact education endeavours to do the very opposite. 'Promotion of' policies like section 28 caused much harm than good. School groups supporting gay youth shut down in their droves as did support in general as there was concern about breaking the law. My own brother suffered mercilessly at the hands of vicious bullies during this time. So I speak up at cruel and outmoded policies, slurs and attitudes as it might help to put that take out there. A take that is not a controversial stance in wider society.

So the basic act of discussing different types of relationship isn't 'promotion'. It's a recognision of real life. By your logic though, as you believe that discussing these relationships 'configures society' to be a place where there are somehow more gay people, you will also be of the mind that where relationships are depicted between members of different races, that can also promote and encourage those kind of relationships. That is clearly something that both has been and can easily be heavily influenced by societal views. It requires zero shift in sexuality. Just the a-ok by social. In decades past, it would have been shocking, due to prejudice of the times, for someone to have kids with someone of another race, whereas now it's rightly a complete irrelevance to most people. So, considering the frequent passion and value you attribute to the white racial identity, where's your scathing Viktor Orbán style take on racial mixing within education and society being 'promoted'? There is certainly far more danger to your specific world view from this than other low hanging fruit. It just doesn't play as well for you to vocalise it. It's easier to demean demographics where there is a free pass.

With my view on having a very strict immigration policy , I'm not sure how you've decided that I 'enable the destruction' of 'Europe's biological heritage', but each to their own. If you mean do I attribute different values of those close to me based on their colour, then no.

It's a good and well written post that deserves some thought in the reply.

We differ though I do have some appreciation for your points....Let me address your post tomorrow as I'm off out tonight.

Sounds good to me. Have a fun night.

Well it’s not incorrect to say the majority of Brexiteers are right wing - that’s not the same as far right though.

The whole article is about a very specific incident of right wing violence, presumably because they have an interview with the Austrian chap and are building a story around it.

What incidents of left wing violence against Brexit are you referring to?