This is what people like you do.

You take a joke I made to wind DanH up with and then present it outside of context.

So for anyone reading this who isn't aware about this poster....I suspect he is the old Word Up from the past who left around when Nick departed, if you remember that guy....He's never denied the contention nor answered it.

He has a very similar style and mode of posting. Take what he says against other posters with the knowledge that he has an agenda to present very one eyed representations of their arguments or comments.

Not a poster worthy of trusting on here, nor someone I wager is worthy of much trust in life.

It's unfortunate that I spend the time on those two previous posts before seeing your latest out of context attacks on me.

Edited by Stirlingsays (07 Jul 2019 8.39pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

A persons sexual identity is for them to express their own way. Certainly where adherence to invented Gods gets in the way of people living their lives I am all for not giving two figs about that, as I made clear before. As I previously stated, the idea the education policy in an area should bend to the will and be catered around muslim sensibilities in muslim areas, which was your take by the way, certainly wasn't for me and I was clear about that.

I don't have a lot of time for religion where it infringes upon others lives and have highlighted that I view assimilation as more difficult when religion is a factor. Mass immigration isn't something I've ever favoured anyway so there's that...

So in your latest display of 'identity politics'....which seemingly regularly relates to this one group, you are suggesting that the word 'fag' is just as bad a word as the word, '******'.

Not to me personally and I'd suggest not in society generally but regardless I was making a joke, and you imply here that this context doesn't matter as you try to demonise me.

You aren't worthy of trust on here, nor I suggest would you be in real life.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

They are both the most hateful word that can be expressed towards said groups. I don't much care about whatever hierarchy you have in your head or whatever justification you feel makes sense to you. Neither words are present in most peoples vocabulary, because people tend to extend a modicum of decency to their fellow man. They tend to pull together. To Assimilate.

Hateful in your eyes maybe.....How progressive of you to use 'hateful', which would suggest I 'hate'.

I don't view 'fag' as anything other than a slight slur and I used it within a joke context. Unless you are supporting censorship of words you don't like I suggest you get over it and accept it as such.

I deliberately used it to wind up a fellow 'progressive' like you.

I don't support the increased censorship on words.

Here's some George Carlin for you.

[Link]

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

This isn't sound bawdy joke which is the polar opposite of your actual beliefs though is it. This is someone reeling out talk of 'degenerate fags' as a 'joke' who previously said that you have no obligation to treat gays in any way because they live 'a lifestyle you don't like' and who primed to remove their kids from school if theyre taught about gay relationships. Your behaviour is a lack of familial decency and allegiance, so yes it's a laugh that you whine about others lack of assimilation when effectively that is an accurate description of your own behaviour.

I don't agree with censoring any words. Carlin was a decent man who had plenty of time for everyone regardless of colour or creed. That ain't you. Unless people share your exacting sensibilities you're marking off demographics like an OAP at bingo.

Edited by dollardays (07 Jul 2019 9.47pm)