This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
W12 27 Feb 19 9.04pm | |
---|---|
By the way, go and watch a real abortion at any stage and come back and tell me it’s a right for women.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Invalid user 2019 27 Feb 19 10.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by W12
By the way, go and watch a real abortion at any stage and come back and tell me it’s a right for women. Ban them outright and you can watch some backstreet abortions too and tell me what you think of those. As with everything in politics the issue of abortion is dragged to two unrealistic extremes by both parties. On the left side of that equation though I definitely worry about how cavalier some women can be about abortion.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
W12 27 Feb 19 10.52pm | |
---|---|
I repeat, go and see it. If you really want to be informed I would urge you and anyone. Eyes properly wide open.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Invalid user 2019 27 Feb 19 11.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by W12
I repeat, go and see it. If you really want to be informed I would urge you and anyone. Eyes properly wide open. There's not a lot I haven't seen and my suggestion is that policy needs to be functional and sensible. If we enact law solely based on the emotion of watching an abortion youtube video or a war video or a child crying at a border wall video, it won't really be useful for society. As I said, intrinsically I believe that society should see abortion as something that's serious and not some kind of lunch break whim. On the whole I'd be in favour of reducing the window for having an abortion, but keeping in mind that they shouldn't be outright illegal due to the very serious knock on effect of that.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Penge Eagle Beckenham 27 Feb 19 11.55pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I have previously decided to stay out of these threads and was hoping someone else would pick up on this but as they haven't I cannot let it just stand, because the claim that the Democrats voted in favour of infanticide is completely wrong and is just being used by Trump to wind up his evangelical base. No doctor, or nurse, would ever allow infanticide to take place and they have reacted with justified outrage at such a suggestion. What actually happened was that the Democrats refused to endorse a bill that sought to make illegal something that is already illegal. They did so because they regarded the bill as a stalking horse attempt to introduce a wider ban on abortion. So unless you regard abortion as infanticide what is suggested just isn't true. That's it. I won't enter a long debate on this but urge those interested to research the real facts. Well if you actually read the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, you will know there is no restriction of abortion in it. Yes there was a 2002 bill, but there is currently no existing federal legislation that mandates medical care for children born alive after an attempted abortion. The legislation states: "Any infant born alive after an abortion or within a hospital, clinic, or other facility has the same claim to the protection of the law that would arise for any newborn, or for any person who comes to a hospital, clinic, or other facility for screening and treatment or otherwise becomes a patient within its care." I'm no evangelical, and like many, believe that a baby deserves medical care after a botched abortion and should not be put down like a dog. Edited by Penge Eagle (28 Feb 2019 12.03am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Invalid user 2019 28 Feb 19 12.11am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I have previously decided to stay out of these threads and was hoping someone else would pick up on this but... Honestly I just keep reading the very start of your posts and the ever present nature of them and the 'i'm just on my way out of the door, but..' aspect does bring a smile. Trump might call you high energy eagle.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Invalid user 2019 28 Feb 19 12.14am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Penge Eagle
Well if you actually read the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, you will know there is no restriction of abortion in it. Yes there was a 2002 bill, but there is currently no existing federal legislation that mandates medical care for children born alive after an attempted abortion. The legislation states: "Any infant born alive after an abortion or within a hospital, clinic, or other facility has the same claim to the protection of the law that would arise for any newborn, or for any person who comes to a hospital, clinic, or other facility for screening and treatment or otherwise becomes a patient within its care." I'm no evangelical, and like many, believe that a baby deserves medical care after a botched abortion and should not be put down like a dog. Edited by Penge Eagle (28 Feb 2019 12.03am) I'd have to agree with the legislation as stated. The idea of a baby surviving an abortion and then after all of that being taken out by whatever means does sound both horrible and extreme.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Penge Eagle Beckenham 05 Mar 19 12.52pm | |
---|---|
Why does the BBC not bleep out Trump saying "bulls***" in this 20 second clip? they would for anyone else [Link]
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Penge Eagle Beckenham 07 Mar 19 8.15pm | |
---|---|
They changed the earlier headline from a statement of fact this morning: 'Donald Trump get Apple boss’s name wrong' to this: 'Does Donald Trump get Apple boss’s name wrong?' [Link] Is this actual news? Or just an excuse to mock the president?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Stirlingsays 07 Mar 19 8.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Penge Eagle
They changed the earlier headline from a statement of fact this morning: 'Donald Trump get Apple boss’s name wrong' to this: 'Does Donald Trump get Apple boss’s name wrong?' [Link] Is this actual news? Or just an excuse to mock the president?
I find the whole, 'Tim Apple' thing amusing. He's the god emperor....these minions scuttle around his ankles blowing raspberries. His name will always be remembered, theirs won't.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
.TUX. 22 Mar 19 10.52pm | |
---|---|
The Mueller report is in and guess what............
Buy Litecoin. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
black eagle. south croydon. 22 Mar 19 11.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by .TUX.
The Mueller report is in and guess what............ Trump getting impeached hopefully.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.