This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Sexyeagle21 Croydon 09 Jan 05 3.11pm | |
---|---|
I think you would have more answers than i ever would tho.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
A_JsShorts 09 Jan 05 3.29pm | |
---|---|
At the end of the day no-one here is going to change what they believe and I wouldn't want anyone too, this is about listening to each others opinions and understanding and respecting what other people believe. Being a non christian, I myself and speak for many many more have 'ignored' God and have not done too bad so far. Not really wanting to bring politics into this, but I will mention it once only, the most powerful leader in the world has done a fantistic job at fcuking up - and guess what, he's a christain. And when have I mentioned and picked at other beliefs? I don't recall it please remind me. I am not going to sit here and prove evolution to you as I am noehter a scientist nor physitian, but I ask you the same question about creation. If there were two people left on this planet you are telling me they would be able to re-create and repopulate the earth?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
rach_cpfc South Croydon 09 Jan 05 4.09pm | |
---|---|
Quote tinkerbell85 at 09 Jan 2005 2:52pm
I'm a Christian. Really good website for people who do want to look into the Christian faith is: I'll try and attempt to answer questions too but I'm not very good at it and get myself into a muddle! However, I believe: That Jesus was real, he existed, he performed miracles and he died so that we could all have eternal life in heaven. I believe in God as the creator of the world and all things in it. He created everything perfectly and we're the ones that spoilt it. I believe in the Holy Spirit as God's representative on earth. I believe that people can feel it's power. I believe the Bible is a book of truth and the fundamental points cannot be interpreted. I belive that all humans are sinful but we can be forgiven if we ask for it. I believe that we all have free will and that we have a choice in everything we do whether its a good or bad choice. I believe also that it's not God who's turned 'his' back on the world it's people that have turned their back on 'him'. I cannot believe that we are here by chance and that my life has no meaning but to exist and then die. The earth was created on the perfect angle for life to exist. That cannot be by chance surely?? By the way, I still have questions to ask. I'm not perfect. Completely agree with all that Becky! A couple of people have mentioned about not having free-will any more if you're a Christian, but that's not true. Yes, there are rules to follow, but only ones that are there for our own good, and I can still choose to go against those rules.
"....They will soar on wings like EAGLES; they will run and not grow |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
mattwebb Sutton 09 Jan 05 6.23pm | |
---|---|
Quote A_JsShorts at 09 Jan 2005 3:29pm
Just because science has a theory, evolution actually contradicts natural selection (they are not the same as is commonly a mistaken belief, and many others contradict, but just because some scientists believe something by making loads of assumptions to get there, does not mean it is true. I can't prove creation to you, except by asking you to witness birth, and then explaining to me what is it that gives that baby the life inside it (Sperm and an egg? - please!), but I can show you some of the many flaws in the theory of evolution.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
A_JsShorts 09 Jan 05 6.49pm | |
---|---|
Quote mattwebb at 09 Jan 2005 6:23pm
Quote A_JsShorts at 09 Jan 2005 3:29pm
Just because science has a theory, evolution actually contradicts natural selection (they are not the same as is commonly a mistaken belief, and many others contradict, but just because some scientists believe something by making loads of assumptions to get there, does not mean it is true. I can't prove creation to you, except by asking you to witness birth, and then explaining to me what is it that gives that baby the life inside it (Sperm and an egg? - please!), but I can show you some of the many flaws in the theory of evolution. When I made my desicion as to what I believed I chose the idea that I felt I could understand and was more believable to myself. Nothing you say to me will make me change my mind one bit, the same as what I say to you. But what I have seen on TV, learnt at school and read myself means to me what the bible means to you. As someone with children I don't need to explain to you how babies are created do I? Think back to biology class when you were at school. At the end of the day, I don't have the answers. But I would expect you to understand and respect what I think which I unfortunatly don't think you can do. I am open to ideas, I have been to church and been to the Virgin Marys final resting place, but for me evolution is the only theory.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
tinkerbell85 Redhill 09 Jan 05 7.00pm | |
---|---|
If evolution was true though then how come we haven't found any fossils that are like half fish and half frog or something??
Up, up and away in my beautiful balloon! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jcreedy 09 Jan 05 7.33pm | |
---|---|
Forgive me if I've missed it, but I don't think the incest question has been answered. If the world was populated by two people, does God allow incest?
It was my dream to play for Palace and to make my debut. I've always played for the club so if I'm playing here, I wouldn't want to be anywhere else. - John Bostock (Nov 2007) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
A_JsShorts 09 Jan 05 7.36pm | |
---|---|
This was Matts reply to my incest question : You are getting into a whole new topic called Devolution. If natural selection is true, which i believe it is then each time we have kids, they lose genes from both parents. This means that if there were ever two original humans which both evolutionists and creationists believe (otherwise we get into black's being lower down the evolutionary chain etc), then they must have had the genes for all races and creeds. The more and more genes you lose down the generations, the worse it would be to have children with someone from the exact gene pool as you, because the child will lose genes without gaining any. God does not allow incest anymore, that was stopped as soon as necessary, but for the first two humans who scientifically MUST have had more gene options, it was fine medically.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jcreedy 09 Jan 05 7.48pm | |
---|---|
Quote A_JsShorts at 09 Jan 2005 7:36pm
This was Matts reply to my incest question : You are getting into a whole new topic called Devolution. If natural selection is true, which i believe it is then each time we have kids, they lose genes from both parents. This means that if there were ever two original humans which both evolutionists and creationists believe (otherwise we get into black's being lower down the evolutionary chain etc), then they must have had the genes for all races and creeds. The more and more genes you lose down the generations, the worse it would be to have children with someone from the exact gene pool as you, because the child will lose genes without gaining any. God does not allow incest anymore, that was stopped as soon as necessary, but for the first two humans who scientifically MUST have had more gene options, it was fine medically. But at the end of the day, he allowed incest.
It was my dream to play for Palace and to make my debut. I've always played for the club so if I'm playing here, I wouldn't want to be anywhere else. - John Bostock (Nov 2007) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Danger Playa del Merstham 09 Jan 05 7.56pm | |
---|---|
The way I see it, it has to be down to personal perception because both the creation and evolution arguments have their strong and their weak points. Firstly my GCSE science hat will come on: There is the whole big bang theory. A so-called collision of certain particles forming the earth we live in today (or at least as it was when it all began). However surely something must have already been present for these “particles” to be present suggesting some sort of “earth” being present already (although different to the earth we live on at present). And also if this whole theory is so true, how come it took until 1927 for someone (Belgian priest Georges Lemaître) to mention it and claim it to be the case. I do find it interesting that a priest – someone in a high standing religious position – was the first to suggest that theory. On the other hand this theory does make some sense as it is clearly links the reasons why the distant galaxies are travelling away from us at high speeds. The theory also predicts the existence of cosmic background radiation (the glow left over from the explosion itself). The Big Bang Theory received its strongest confirmation when this radiation was discovered in 1964. Now a little quote that I managed to dig out: Quote Although the Big Bang Theory is widely accepted, it probably will never be proved; consequentially, leaving a number of tough, unanswered questions.
Now for my (admittedly limited) Religious hat: From the religious side of things there is also some very valid points that creation by God was how the modern world was started (for want of a better word). However, as with the big bang theory, there are also ways that the argument suffers. Many creationists believe the following 4 points (had to steal this as I have no knowledge really): • Although there is plenty of evidence for adaptive changes in species (microevolution), we do not in recorded history see one species becoming an entirely different, more highly evolved organism. For example, we have no examples in recorded history of a fish becoming an amphibian or even a bacteria evolving into anything other than a bacteria. • The fossil record does not show the gradual changes that Darwin predicted. • There can be errors in carbon dating and other methods that are used to determine the age of fossils and the Earth itself. • DNA and RNA comparisons between similar and dissimilar species at times confirm evolution, but in other circumstances are inconsistent. These are all very good, and true points which work strongly for the creationists argument. There are also reasons why creation may not have occurred, however, in that some of the theory contradicts a lot of the stuff the bible forbids. The main issue that brings this argument up for me is the question of who Cain married. One of the chapters of the bible (don’t know exactly which bit) says that Cain had a wife who gave him a son. However this says to me that an incestuous relationship had occurred as the only other people on the earth at the time (the Bible’s words, not mine) were Adam, Eve and their children, meaning that Cain married his sister (the only logical answer). Incest is something that the bible later condones. In conclusion to this, I’m going to sit on the fence, I don’t know how the Earth began. Both theories have too many discrepancies to make them justifiable. Can’t we just accept the world is here, rather than having to prove why? Just enjoy it for what it is. (sorry for writing this like an essay, it was the easiest way for me to get my point across) Edited by Danger (09 Jan 2005 7:57pm) Edited by Danger (09 Jan 2005 7:57pm)
FFS MURRAY |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
rach_cpfc South Croydon 09 Jan 05 9.11pm | |
---|---|
Excellent post Nick, one of the most balanced and well thought out of this discussion.
"....They will soar on wings like EAGLES; they will run and not grow |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Danger Playa del Merstham 09 Jan 05 9.13pm | |
---|---|
Quote rach_d_cpfc at 09 Jan 2005 9:11pm
Excellent post Nick, one of the most balanced and well thought out of this discussion. It was always gonna happen one day
FFS MURRAY |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.