Incorrect again, she paid UK tax on her UK earnings in addition to paying a fee for non dom status.

She has UK income from at least one company, Catamaran Ventures UK and paid tax on that.

It's just another attempt to claim that people are somehow envious or idiotic if they're not high fiving Sunak, and giving a free pass to his wife who is resident here, took advantage of hundred of thousands in furlough cash, and is 'fortunate' enough to gain lucrative government contracts to the tune of tens of millions benefiting both her and her husband. All while avoiding up to £20 million in UK tax by choosing to be non-domiciled, as others continue to pay their way and contribute.

Certainly for someone in Sunak's position the ethics of this can be questioned. People know 'them and us' when they see it from the 'servants of the people', and criticising tax loopholes designed by the rich, for the rich can only be a good thing, no matter if some are angered by opposition to the status quo. Our 'elected representatives' don't need additional encouragement to mug off the average hard working Brit, they need the opposite.

Edited by BlueJay (18 Apr 2022 3.59pm)

Yes, it makes a mockery of both those making ends meet, and those thriving who 'genuinely' pay their way into the countries' coffers. We're being mugged off every which way by those we trust to represent us. At least spoiling a ballet makes your feelings known. I'll likely join you as I certainly don't see Con or Lab as supporters of Joe Public at this time.

Edited by BlueJay (18 Apr 2022 9.21pm)

How do you spoil a ballet? I’m now thinking of Paul Hogan commenting on the fellas package in a can of Fosters p1ss advert.

Do you do a barre’ at the bar on your days off?

[Link]

"Any remittance that she pays is likely more than the average outraged idiot pays. Nobody else really cares."

"If enough of you outraged idiots assemble outside Parliament and protest about the non dom law, it will get changed."

None of that related to one person. You have literally said that people that have a problem with this are outraged idiots, and that it's indicative of who would protest it.

"I didn't state that anyone would assemble outside Parliament."

See above. You're arguing with yourself again.

On this very page you say "if the idiots go and protest, they will have done something, instead of being just idiots." so you're still sweepingly calling people with a view contrary to yours idiots (while simultaneously being affronted that people would accuse you of that). You can't get enough of doing so, and across multiple threads have this ridiculous 'prove that I mean what I've clearly just said' approach.

"I didn't call anyone a toddler"... "I suggested his toddler mates might help. He brought up 4 year olds."

Aka you did call people that.

I don't care what you call people, but you repeatedly come out with this outlandish stuff and are then indignant when any of what you say is quoted back. These coin toss takes with accompanying endless pages of pearl clutching and claims of "lies! misrepresentation!" that follow are a complete waste of time. Post what you're happy with and actually believe - it's a bit late to rewind after the fact.

Edited by BlueJay (18 Apr 2022 5.21pm)