This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 19 Jul 21 8.09am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
Atm the road to Damascus will probably get you a bullet so not a great saying. How many is this many because if only 52% of the voters for brexit didn't do it purposly to harm themselves you are wrong! Paul isn't though on the road to Damascus atm and guns didn't exist when he was! So the implied message is perfectly apt. How many of those 52% really understood the implications? How many were conned into the "grass is greener" messaging that always accompanies political campaigns, and was especially prevalent with Brexit? No-one knows precisely how many, but with such a small margin it would have been enough to make the difference. Which is why my consistent argument was, and remains, that decisions this important should never be subjected to the winds of chance implicit in a referendum. We elect representatives. We ask them to study and decide. They were overwhelmingly in favour of us remaining a member. We were let down by the Tory Party's desire to kill off UKIP. A failure of leadership that will haunt us for generations to come.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 19 Jul 21 8.35am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Paul isn't though on the road to Damascus atm and guns didn't exist when he was! So the implied message is perfectly apt. How many of those 52% really understood the implications? How many were conned into the "grass is greener" messaging that always accompanies political campaigns, and was especially prevalent with Brexit? No-one knows precisely how many, but with such a small margin it would have been enough to make the difference. Which is why my consistent argument was, and remains, that decisions this important should never be subjected to the winds of chance implicit in a referendum. We elect representatives. We ask them to study and decide. They were overwhelmingly in favour of us remaining a member. We were let down by the Tory Party's desire to kill off UKIP. A failure of leadership that will haunt us for generations to come. Are we really going around this Mobius loop again? Until you can prove how many of those MPs weren’t “overwhelmingly” pro-EU out of political expediency it seems pointless.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 19 Jul 21 8.39am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Paul isn't though on the road to Damascus atm and guns didn't exist when he was! So the implied message is perfectly apt. How many of those 52% really understood the implications? How many were conned into the "grass is greener" messaging that always accompanies political campaigns, and was especially prevalent with Brexit? No-one knows precisely how many, but with such a small margin it would have been enough to make the difference. Which is why my consistent argument was, and remains, that decisions this important should never be subjected to the winds of chance implicit in a referendum. We elect representatives. We ask them to study and decide. They were overwhelmingly in favour of us remaining a member. We were let down by the Tory Party's desire to kill off UKIP. A failure of leadership that will haunt us for generations to come. How many young remain voters were “conned” into thinking there was no life outside the EU? Edited by Spiderman (19 Jul 2021 8.40am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 19 Jul 21 9.43am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Are we really going around this Mobius loop again? Until you can prove how many of those MPs weren’t “overwhelmingly” pro-EU out of political expediency it seems pointless. Oh, it's totally pointless to have a post-mortem. The foul deed is done, and the patient is dead. Nevertheless, spurious claims need to be countered and the argument against referendums needs to be made. If we don't learn the lessons of the past, we are destined to repeat them.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 19 Jul 21 9.49am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Oh, it's totally pointless to have a post-mortem. The foul deed is done, and the patient is dead. Nevertheless, spurious claims need to be countered and the argument against referendums needs to be made. If we don't learn the lessons of the past, we are destined to repeat them. Yes. The mistake we made was joining the EU in the first place. Of course, it was called the Common Market back then.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 19 Jul 21 9.49am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
How many young remain voters were “conned” into thinking there was no life outside the EU? Edited by Spiderman (19 Jul 2021 8.40am) I have no wish to either divert the thread, or go over old ground. It just slipped in again as part of the context as a pretty important part of our recent history, and then grew again. I'll leave it there. Until the next time!
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 19 Jul 21 9.53am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I'm sure your holiday album is full of nice pictures and you have gained a few air miles, but that does not make you an expert on anything. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (19 Jul 2021 7.45am) I lived in Asia for several years, and spent many months working both in the USA and parts of Europe. So rather more than just holidays. Not an expert, but with enough experience to have an opinion.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 19 Jul 21 9.58am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Yes. The mistake we made was joining the EU in the first place. Of course, it was called the Common Market back then. Evolution isn't a mistake. It's a progression. Weaknesses will be ironed out and eventually eliminated. You cannot though evolve unless you are open to change.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The Dolphin 19 Jul 21 10.05am | |
---|---|
I don't agree with much that Wisbech says but i do agree on this occasion.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 19 Jul 21 10.07am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I lived in Asia for several years, and spent many months working both in the USA and parts of Europe. So rather more than just holidays. Not an expert, but with enough experience to have an opinion. You know what opinions are like... This thread was about the stupidity of removing statues, not Brexit, just in case you had forgotten.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 19 Jul 21 10.40am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Evolution isn't a mistake. It's a progression. Weaknesses will be ironed out and eventually eliminated. You cannot though evolve unless you are open to change. That sounds like something Hitler would have said. How appropriate when talking about the EU. It's OK until the weakness is you. Not all change is good. We tried it and didn't like it. It was never a good fit.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 19 Jul 21 11.36am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
That sounds like something Hitler would have said. How appropriate when talking about the EU. It's OK until the weakness is you. Not all change is good. We tried it and didn't like it. It was never a good fit.
The general direction of travel in this context being towards greater co-operation between like-minded nations. Not isolationism. It is more efficient to co-operate with your near neighbours than with those half a world away.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.