This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Beanyboysmd 03 Jun 19 9.48pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by johnno42000
I'm not really up on things to do with European regulations. Is there a regulation that says you can't? Must admit I have no idea but I did think that the East Coast Line was taken back into public ownership. Actually im a remainer and I remember hearing something similar...I think you can but if its public it has to go to tender to another country. I will double check because even at the time I thought it was weird...
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 03 Jun 19 9.52pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
Ho hum another day in the books. And the ever present truth remains: The WA is dead and can never be reanimated. There will never be a no deal crash out of the EU which is signed off on by parliament. Bercow will ensure parliament has a say on that and that even charming, cuddly, harmless toff prime ministers cannot decree that unilaterally. The only way a no deal exit can happen, is if it is explicitly voted for by the public. The only way a no deal exit will be put on the ballot paper, is if revoking article 50 is next to it. There is no way on earth more people in this country want a no deal exit, than want to stay in the EU. Therefore we are now 1 day closer to the cancellation of Brexit. In your opinion others opinions are available (for now anyway). And Parliament should have a say on a no deal Brexit I have no issue with that. Of course the outcome may not be what you think.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 03 Jun 19 9.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
Ho hum another day in the books. And the ever present truth remains: The WA is dead and can never be reanimated. There will never be a no deal crash out of the EU which is signed off on by parliament. Bercow will ensure parliament has a say on that and that even charming, cuddly, harmless toff prime ministers cannot decree that unilaterally. The only way a no deal exit can happen, is if it is explicitly voted for by the public. The only way a no deal exit will be put on the ballot paper, is if revoking article 50 is next to it. There is no way on earth more people in this country want a no deal exit, than want to stay in the EU. Thought you were in the US? Didn't know they were in the EU. Sorry did I twist what you said...what's good for the goose and all that
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Maine Eagle USA 03 Jun 19 10.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Thought you were in the US? Didn't know they were in the EU. Sorry did I twist what you said...what's good for the goose and all that My word that is a pointless post. This country, meaning the country in question. I didn’t twist what you said, spidey, I just hit “reply” and quoted what you said, exactly as it was, which is pretty common around here.
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
.TUX. 03 Jun 19 10.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
Ho hum another day in the books. And the ever present truth remains: The WA is dead and can never be reanimated. There will never be a no deal crash out of the EU which is signed off on by parliament. Bercow will ensure parliament has a say on that and that even charming, cuddly, harmless toff prime ministers cannot decree that unilaterally. The only way a no deal exit can happen, is if it is explicitly voted for by the public. The only way a no deal exit will be put on the ballot paper, is if revoking article 50 is next to it. There is no way on earth more people in this country want a no deal exit, than want to stay in the EU. Therefore we are now 1 day closer to the cancellation of Brexit. And equally the failing bloc.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 03 Jun 19 10.32pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
My word that is a pointless post. This country, meaning the country in question. I didn’t twist what you said, spidey, I just hit “reply” and quoted what you said, exactly as it was, which is pretty common around here. And here is what Midland Eagle replied to you: Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 03 Jun 19 11.15pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Beanyboysmd
Actually im a remainer and I remember hearing something similar...I think you can but if its public it has to go to tender to another country. I will double check because even at the time I thought it was weird... I believe you can nationalise if there remains competition. So part nationalisation is feasible.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Maine Eagle USA 04 Jun 19 12.40am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
And here is what Midland Eagle replied to you: Originally posted by Midlands Eagle And he was as wrong then as you are now. I don’t change quotes of others when replying. Go read it again, spidey, as your spidey sense is off and I await an apology from Midlands Eagle.
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 04 Jun 19 6.48am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
I didn’t twist what you said, spidey, I just hit “reply” and quoted what you said, exactly as it was, which is pretty common around here. I had hoped to leave this one behind but obviously not so here is exactly what was said:- Originally posted by Spiderman
Don't think ME said he disliked them and showed no prejudice towards them did he? Originally posted by Maine Eagle
Think your spidey sense is a bit off again here, Pete. You don’t think he showed no prejudice, that would be a double negative. You didn't quote exactly what was said as you left out "Don't think ME said he disliked them" which correctly has a single negative as does the second half that you did quote so by editing the quote you made an incorrect point. Now can we leave it please
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 04 Jun 19 7.03am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
I believe you can nationalise if there remains competition. So part nationalisation is feasible. Part nationalisation? Sounds very much like the Chinese system. Isn't that just a form of state assistance to companies?
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 04 Jun 19 8.23am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Part nationalisation? Sounds very much like the Chinese system. Isn't that just a form of state assistance to companies? That is precisely what is not supposed to happen. In theory it is a level playing field. East Coast Mainline was in State hands for over 5 years
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 04 Jun 19 8.35am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
That is precisely what is not supposed to happen. In theory it is a level playing field. East Coast Mainline was in State hands for over 5 years In theory I could play left back for Palace.....I wouldn't advise it though. I'm not fundamentally against re-nationalisation of the railways as the way privationisation was handled and structured has resulted in rail having priced out many people......when it's meant to be a national rail service. I could be convinced....but surely the practicalities and cost would be strong arguments against.....it leads me to suspect that it's not really a sensible path to pursue.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.