This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 23 Feb 23 9.57pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
Ah yes the good ole days when you could just jump on a plane and they barely looked at your EU passport and all for the price of, well billions and the loss of our national sovereignty. It was such a bargain can't think why we left. We never lost our national sovereignty. It's a myth which is used by the Brexit lobby to justify some extremely irresponsible claims. Our membership cost billions? I would wager our withdrawal will cost us much more.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 23 Feb 23 10.07pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
We never lost our national sovereignty. It's a myth which is used by the Brexit lobby to justify some extremely irresponsible claims. Our membership cost billions? I would wager our withdrawal will cost us much more. Current costs.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
georgenorman 23 Feb 23 10.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Totally wrong. A major disadvantage of Brexit will be the costs of more government. Not the direct costs of parliament, but the hidden costs of having to do all the things ourselves that were previously done by the EU. Costs which are wished away by the Brexiteers and, whilst at the moment difficult to quantify, are nonetheless very real and logically well in excess of our previous EU contributions. The government should do far less, so called, 'governing' and certainly should not continue with much of the over-regulation and doomed-to-fail 'planning' that the EU gets up to.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 23 Feb 23 10.49pm | |
---|---|
I am unsure whether these costs include those that I am identifying and seems more likely to just be the direct economic ones. Nevertheless, if the overall cost of our EU membership over 45 years was £216 billion, after adjustment for inflation, then the estimated cost of withdrawal up to 2020 of £200 billion is fairly conclusive proof that Brexit has cost far more than our membership ever did.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 23 Feb 23 10.56pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by georgenorman
The government should do far less, so called, 'governing' and certainly should not continue with much of the over-regulation and doomed-to-fail 'planning' that the EU gets up to. The problem with "light" government is you end up with businesses run by criminals and lower standards. We need a regulatory framework to ensure both safety and a level playing field.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 23 Feb 23 11.19pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I am unsure whether these costs include those that I am identifying and seems more likely to just be the direct economic ones. Nevertheless, if the overall cost of our EU membership over 45 years was £216 billion, after adjustment for inflation, then the estimated cost of withdrawal up to 2020 of £200 billion is fairly conclusive proof that Brexit has cost far more than our membership ever did. Can only assume no one knew the amount involved before or did Remain publicise the likely costs? I can't remember.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Stoke sub normal 24 Feb 23 1.02am | |
---|---|
I was simplifying for the benefit of the audience. (You don't need to, the audience is generally smarter than you. However, you think that your intelligence is superior to most others of your species, as proved below.) Your emotional outburst (what emotional outburst? Explain how you came to that conclusion) is also rather obviously incorrect, it’s an observable fact that the levels of stupidity on this, or any forum for that matter, run deep and are richly varied. I mean, you’re demonstrating that right now - age clearly does not always equate to intelligence or wisdom, in fact statistically it results in gradual, sometimes aggressive, cognitive decline. Which can be a big problem if already starting from a low base.(see above. Superiority complex writ large.) Also, and this made me chuckle, ‘Come up with’? Expects someone to lay out and devise, in detail, an exact method for measurement as to whether we are doing better or worse because of Brexit in 5 minutes. On a forum. I’m more sure than you are about who is the ‘thick’ one here.(I asked you how it would be measured, you said "an unscientific, yet simple way of doing so would be to see how we're performing against other comparable countries still in the EU in a few years time". It's hardly an answer from someone who ranks himself in the top 5% intelligentsia. Unscientific is less than thick, it's worthless. Just say you can't answer the question.) The point, which you’ve both missed and not responded properly to, is that a body of individuals with the qualifications, intelligence and time to do so will at some point pull together a comprehensive study that concludes either way. That conclusion will then be an excellent guide as to whether leaving or staying was or would have been the better option.(If only you'd said that, instead of pretending to have the answer) Until that occurs, I see little value in debating using ideological absolutisms either way especially when many are suggesting that the outcome is irrelevant ‘because democracy’. Slavishly adhering to ideology regardless of outcome is about as stupid as it gets. Again - uncomfortable for some, but it may well be that the price of prosperity is in fact compromising on full Independence and having to rejoin. It also may not and we will end up better off than the EU. But you need to be open to the fact that either could turn out to be true.( I agree with you on all the rest of your snipe.) Edited by Tim Gypsy Hill '64 (24 Feb 2023 1.18am)
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Stoke sub normal 24 Feb 23 1.13am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
How lucky we are that the HOL operates as a benign geniocracy. I think David Dunning and Justin Kruger would have taken an interest here.
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Stoke sub normal 24 Feb 23 1.16am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Ha. A significant number of contributors to these political threads are about as benign as they are close to meeting the qualifying criteria for a geniocracy. Did you Master in Raëlism?
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
georgenorman 24 Feb 23 7.31am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
We never lost our national sovereignty. It's a myth which is used by the Brexit lobby to justify some extremely irresponsible claims. Our membership cost billions? I would wager our withdrawal will cost us much more. Of course we gave up our national sovereignty, albeit with the ability to take it back as we did with Brexit. To deny it is a myth which is used by the Remainer lobby to justify some extremely irresponsible claims. Our withdrawal will cost billions? I would wager our membership would cost us much more.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
georgenorman 24 Feb 23 7.37am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
The problem with "light" government is you end up with businesses run by criminals and lower standards. We need a regulatory framework to ensure both safety and a level playing field. Your "heavy" government and over-regulation does practically nothing to stop criminality or low standards, both of which are rampant in socialist economies - and there is no such thing as a level playing field, just successful and unsuccessful businesses.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 24 Feb 23 8.18am | |
---|---|
On the point would we have been economically better off staying in the EU rather than leaving this came up during the Brexit debate on here and my opinion hasn't changed, its pure conjecture either way. You can speculate by pointing to similar countries but there are so many variables whether you are Pro or Remain it is just guess work. I think the only thing you can do is ask people how they feel which for most is not scientific but emotional. Right now we are still untangling ourselves from the EU and this government has yet to have a bonfire of EU red tape or grasp the opportunities. The cost of living crisis has distorted how people fell anyway. Perhaps in 5 years time we will have a better idea.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.